Understanding the heterogeneous roles of China's sectors under the shock of second Trump administration's new tariffs: A novel method of shock-based input-output data envelopment analysis

IF 9 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Liqi Hu, Shanshan Chen, Chengjie Zhang, Lijuan Zhou, Aijun Li
{"title":"Understanding the heterogeneous roles of China's sectors under the shock of second Trump administration's new tariffs: A novel method of shock-based input-output data envelopment analysis","authors":"Liqi Hu,&nbsp;Shanshan Chen,&nbsp;Chengjie Zhang,&nbsp;Lijuan Zhou,&nbsp;Aijun Li","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2025.135687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing studies on input-output analysis quantify losses resulting from new tariffs, but provide limited insight into identifying vulnerable sectors and regions. This study first integrates loss analysis with efficiency analysis, and is capable of assessing vulnerability. Methodologically, this study proposes a novel shock-based input-output DEA model and an extended input-output model. Furthermore, four coefficients are adopted to capture sectoral interconnections and loss propagation. Empirically, this study considers new tariffs possibly adopted by the second Trump administration on China. Our main conclusions are summarized below. Firstly, China's overall indirect losses significantly outweigh direct losses, with indirect losses being 3.6 times direct ones. Secondly, loss distribution displays pronounced heterogeneity across sectors and provinces. Electronic and Telecommunications Equipment sector experiences large direct (27.11 % of China's total) and indirect losses (18.90 % of total). Four eastern provinces (Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai) experience large indirect losses (69.05 % of total). Thirdly, energy industry belongs to a typical relatively supportive industry, with limited direct losses but large indirect losses. Finally, inefficiency sources vary much across industries and provinces. Particularly, Shanxi, Shandong, and Inner Mongolia exhibit significant potential for improving efficiency in energy industry. Consequently, policymakers should develop well-suited strategies to efficiently allocate limited resources, prioritizing recovery of vulnerable sectors and provinces.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 135687"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544225013295","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Existing studies on input-output analysis quantify losses resulting from new tariffs, but provide limited insight into identifying vulnerable sectors and regions. This study first integrates loss analysis with efficiency analysis, and is capable of assessing vulnerability. Methodologically, this study proposes a novel shock-based input-output DEA model and an extended input-output model. Furthermore, four coefficients are adopted to capture sectoral interconnections and loss propagation. Empirically, this study considers new tariffs possibly adopted by the second Trump administration on China. Our main conclusions are summarized below. Firstly, China's overall indirect losses significantly outweigh direct losses, with indirect losses being 3.6 times direct ones. Secondly, loss distribution displays pronounced heterogeneity across sectors and provinces. Electronic and Telecommunications Equipment sector experiences large direct (27.11 % of China's total) and indirect losses (18.90 % of total). Four eastern provinces (Guangdong, Jiangsu, Zhejiang and Shanghai) experience large indirect losses (69.05 % of total). Thirdly, energy industry belongs to a typical relatively supportive industry, with limited direct losses but large indirect losses. Finally, inefficiency sources vary much across industries and provinces. Particularly, Shanxi, Shandong, and Inner Mongolia exhibit significant potential for improving efficiency in energy industry. Consequently, policymakers should develop well-suited strategies to efficiently allocate limited resources, prioritizing recovery of vulnerable sectors and provinces.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信