{"title":"Strategic green roof placement in Toronto to maximize benefits while incorporating citizen preferences","authors":"Matthew Jung , Sharlene L. Gomes , Roy P. Remme","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Green roofs provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including air quality regulation, temperature regulation, flood regulation, and habitat provision. Through strategic placement they can address multiple urban challenges. However, city governments often do not engage in strategic spatial and fail to consider citizen preferences. To address this, we developed an approach for strategic placement of green roofs, based on the four mentioned ecosystem services for Toronto, Canada. We designed an approach based on biophysical information, which we further enriched with data on citizen preferences for different ecosystem services. We used literature-derived criteria and spatial analysis to identify optimal green roof placement locations for each ecosystem service separately, and the four services combined. A citizen survey was conducted (n = 402) to rank ecosystem services based on preferences. Mean rankings were used for a citizen-weighted model for strategic green roof placements. Our approach identified key priority areas for Toronto, while also highlighting that a significant portion of the city’s rooftops are sub-optimal for maximizing the benefits of all four ecosystem. However, by focusing on turning roofs in hotspot areas (0.2–1.2 % of total roof space) into green roofs, the four ecosystem services could be enhanced simultaneously. Results showed large spatial variations in priority areas between individual ecosystem services. However, comparing results across the biophysical and citizen weighted approach for all ecosystem services combined indicated similar priority areas, suggesting citizen support for prioritisation related to biophysical needs. Moreover, citizen involvement in governance practices can foster transparency, inclusivity, and satisfaction in strategic planning of green roofs. The methods employed in this study can be adapted to other cities worldwide, enabling more strategic, participatory approaches to implementing green roofs to enhance multiple ecosystem services where they are valued most.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128798"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Green roofs provide a broad range of ecosystem services, including air quality regulation, temperature regulation, flood regulation, and habitat provision. Through strategic placement they can address multiple urban challenges. However, city governments often do not engage in strategic spatial and fail to consider citizen preferences. To address this, we developed an approach for strategic placement of green roofs, based on the four mentioned ecosystem services for Toronto, Canada. We designed an approach based on biophysical information, which we further enriched with data on citizen preferences for different ecosystem services. We used literature-derived criteria and spatial analysis to identify optimal green roof placement locations for each ecosystem service separately, and the four services combined. A citizen survey was conducted (n = 402) to rank ecosystem services based on preferences. Mean rankings were used for a citizen-weighted model for strategic green roof placements. Our approach identified key priority areas for Toronto, while also highlighting that a significant portion of the city’s rooftops are sub-optimal for maximizing the benefits of all four ecosystem. However, by focusing on turning roofs in hotspot areas (0.2–1.2 % of total roof space) into green roofs, the four ecosystem services could be enhanced simultaneously. Results showed large spatial variations in priority areas between individual ecosystem services. However, comparing results across the biophysical and citizen weighted approach for all ecosystem services combined indicated similar priority areas, suggesting citizen support for prioritisation related to biophysical needs. Moreover, citizen involvement in governance practices can foster transparency, inclusivity, and satisfaction in strategic planning of green roofs. The methods employed in this study can be adapted to other cities worldwide, enabling more strategic, participatory approaches to implementing green roofs to enhance multiple ecosystem services where they are valued most.
期刊介绍:
Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries.
The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects:
-Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology.
-Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation.
-Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments.
-Management of urban forests and other vegetation.
Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.