The environmental impact and eco-efficiency analysis of retired power battery recycling in China

IF 8.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Siyu Hou, Fan Yang, Xuning Zhuang, Xiaolong Song, Yongqi Dou, Wenjie Wu
{"title":"The environmental impact and eco-efficiency analysis of retired power battery recycling in China","authors":"Siyu Hou,&nbsp;Fan Yang,&nbsp;Xuning Zhuang,&nbsp;Xiaolong Song,&nbsp;Yongqi Dou,&nbsp;Wenjie Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.116483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs) industry, recycling of the retired power batteries (RPBs) has become a significant topic with the concern of EVs sustainable development. This study evaluates the environmental impact and economic performance of RPBs recycling in China, including four recycling technologies for ternary lithium iron (NCM) batteries and two recycling technologies for lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries with different echelon use rates, based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis (LCC) methods. The concept of eco-efficiency is innovatively introduced to further analyze the relationship between environmental impact and economic performance of RPBs recycling. Results show that both NCM and LFP batteries recycling exhibit significant environmental and economic benefits, which are both significantly affected by the echelon use rate. Under the current situation, LFP recycling with higher echelon use rate shows better environmental and economic benefits than NCM recycling. But if recycled with the same echelon use rate, NCM recycling exhibits better eco-efficiency performance than LFP recycling. For technologies, NCM recycling with pyro-hydrometallurgy and LFP recycling with physical method exhibit the best environmental and economic benefits. However, from the viewpoint of eco-efficiency, NCM recycling with hydrometallurgy A and LFP recycling with hydrometallurgy perform the best eco-efficiency. Overall, further improving the echelon use rate (especially for LFP batteries) would significantly enhance the environmental, economic and eco-efficiency performance of RPBs recycling. The results identify the importance of recycling technology selection in the overall environmental and economic performance of RPBs recycling process. The study contributes to identifying the critical role of echelon use rate and recycling technology selection as well as the key affecting factors, so as to improve the overall environmental and economic benefits of RPBs recycling in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"120 ","pages":"Article 116483"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X2501196X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of electric vehicles (EVs) industry, recycling of the retired power batteries (RPBs) has become a significant topic with the concern of EVs sustainable development. This study evaluates the environmental impact and economic performance of RPBs recycling in China, including four recycling technologies for ternary lithium iron (NCM) batteries and two recycling technologies for lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries with different echelon use rates, based on life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle cost analysis (LCC) methods. The concept of eco-efficiency is innovatively introduced to further analyze the relationship between environmental impact and economic performance of RPBs recycling. Results show that both NCM and LFP batteries recycling exhibit significant environmental and economic benefits, which are both significantly affected by the echelon use rate. Under the current situation, LFP recycling with higher echelon use rate shows better environmental and economic benefits than NCM recycling. But if recycled with the same echelon use rate, NCM recycling exhibits better eco-efficiency performance than LFP recycling. For technologies, NCM recycling with pyro-hydrometallurgy and LFP recycling with physical method exhibit the best environmental and economic benefits. However, from the viewpoint of eco-efficiency, NCM recycling with hydrometallurgy A and LFP recycling with hydrometallurgy perform the best eco-efficiency. Overall, further improving the echelon use rate (especially for LFP batteries) would significantly enhance the environmental, economic and eco-efficiency performance of RPBs recycling. The results identify the importance of recycling technology selection in the overall environmental and economic performance of RPBs recycling process. The study contributes to identifying the critical role of echelon use rate and recycling technology selection as well as the key affecting factors, so as to improve the overall environmental and economic benefits of RPBs recycling in China.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of energy storage
Journal of energy storage Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
24.50%
发文量
2262
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信