Evaluation of Zhuhai DL Biotech's BT24 automated blood culture system

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Blanca Carrasco, Elena Hidalgo, Gloria Zaragoza, Juan-Ignacio Alós
{"title":"Evaluation of Zhuhai DL Biotech's BT24 automated blood culture system","authors":"Blanca Carrasco,&nbsp;Elena Hidalgo,&nbsp;Gloria Zaragoza,&nbsp;Juan-Ignacio Alós","doi":"10.1016/j.eimc.2024.07.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>For the microbiological diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia, it is essential to use automated blood culture systems that guarantee good performance in the detection of microorganisms.</div><div>We evaluated the BT24 system for blood cultures (BCs) by comparing it with the BACTEC™ FX system in detection of positive spiked BCs and bottles, subsequent growth of the microorganism, and time to detection (TTD).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The parallel analysis of both systems was performed with 160 strains of 31 different species, each inoculated under the same conditions and simultaneously in six BC bottles.</div><div>The Chi-square test was used for comparison per BC and per bottle detection. Wilcoxon test and Student's <em>t</em>-test were used for comparison of TTDs.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Overall, the following BC (aerobic bottle<!--> <!-->+<!--> <!-->anaerobic bottle) were detected as positive: 160/160 (100%) in BACTEC FX and 158/160 (98.7%) in BT24 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.31). Furthermore, the following pediatric BCs (1 single bottle, aerobic) were also detected: 159/160 (99.4%) in BACTEC FX and 156/160 (97.5%) in BT24 (<em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.17).</div><div>TTDs were longer with BT24 system than with BACTEC FX system, especially for <em>Staphylococcus aureus</em> strains.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We consider the BT24 system with good performance and specificity comparable to the reference system, but inferior in TTD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11608,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica","volume":"43 4","pages":"Pages 188-192"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213005X24002738","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

For the microbiological diagnosis of bacteremia and fungemia, it is essential to use automated blood culture systems that guarantee good performance in the detection of microorganisms.
We evaluated the BT24 system for blood cultures (BCs) by comparing it with the BACTEC™ FX system in detection of positive spiked BCs and bottles, subsequent growth of the microorganism, and time to detection (TTD).

Methods

The parallel analysis of both systems was performed with 160 strains of 31 different species, each inoculated under the same conditions and simultaneously in six BC bottles.
The Chi-square test was used for comparison per BC and per bottle detection. Wilcoxon test and Student's t-test were used for comparison of TTDs.

Results

Overall, the following BC (aerobic bottle + anaerobic bottle) were detected as positive: 160/160 (100%) in BACTEC FX and 158/160 (98.7%) in BT24 (p = 0.31). Furthermore, the following pediatric BCs (1 single bottle, aerobic) were also detected: 159/160 (99.4%) in BACTEC FX and 156/160 (97.5%) in BT24 (p = 0.17).
TTDs were longer with BT24 system than with BACTEC FX system, especially for Staphylococcus aureus strains.

Conclusions

We consider the BT24 system with good performance and specificity comparable to the reference system, but inferior in TTD.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Hoy está universalmente reconocida la renovada y creciente importancia de la patología infecciosa: aparición de nuevos agentes patógenos, de cepas resistentes, de procesos con expresión clínica hasta ahora desconocida, de cuadros de una gran complejidad. Paralelamente, la Microbiología y la Infectología Clínicas han experimentado un gran desarrollo como respuesta al reto planteado por la actual patología infecciosa. Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española SEIMC. Cumple con la garantía científica de esta Sociedad, la doble función de difundir trabajos de investigación, tanto clínicos como microbiológicos, referidos a la patología infecciosa, y contribuye a la formación continuada de los interesados en aquella patología mediante artículos orientados a ese fin y elaborados por autores de la mayor calificación invitados por la revista.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信