{"title":"Multiomics evaluation and machine learning optimize molecular classification, prediction of prognosis and immunotherapy response for ovarian cancer","authors":"Fang Ren , Xiaoao Pang , Ning Liu, Liancheng Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.prp.2025.155925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Ovarian cancer (OC), owing to its substantial heterogeneity and high invasiveness, has historically been devoid of precise, individualized treatment options. This study aimed to establish integrated consensus subtypes of OC using different multiomics integration methodologies.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We integrated five distinct multiomics datasets from multicentric cohorts to identify high-resolution molecular subgroups using a combination of 10 and 101 clustering and machine learning algorithms, respectively, to develop a robust consensus multiomics-related machine learning signature (CMMS).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Two cancer subtypes with prognostic significance were identified using multiomics clustering analysis. 10 essential genes were identified in the CMMS. Patients in the high CMMS group exhibited a poorer prognosis, with a “cold tumor” phenotype and an immunosuppressive state with reduced immune cell infiltration. In contrast, patients in the low CMMS group exhibited a more favorable prognosis, with immune activation and a “hot tumor\" phenotype characterized by increased tumor mutation burden, tumor neoantigen burden, PD-L1 expression, and enriched M1 macrophages. Eight independent immunotherapy datasets were validated to further corroborate our findings regarding patients in the low CMMS group who responded better to immunotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CMMS detection has significant utility in the prognosis of patients at an early stage and identification of potential candidates for immunotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19916,"journal":{"name":"Pathology, research and practice","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 155925"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology, research and practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0344033825001177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Ovarian cancer (OC), owing to its substantial heterogeneity and high invasiveness, has historically been devoid of precise, individualized treatment options. This study aimed to establish integrated consensus subtypes of OC using different multiomics integration methodologies.
Methods
We integrated five distinct multiomics datasets from multicentric cohorts to identify high-resolution molecular subgroups using a combination of 10 and 101 clustering and machine learning algorithms, respectively, to develop a robust consensus multiomics-related machine learning signature (CMMS).
Results
Two cancer subtypes with prognostic significance were identified using multiomics clustering analysis. 10 essential genes were identified in the CMMS. Patients in the high CMMS group exhibited a poorer prognosis, with a “cold tumor” phenotype and an immunosuppressive state with reduced immune cell infiltration. In contrast, patients in the low CMMS group exhibited a more favorable prognosis, with immune activation and a “hot tumor" phenotype characterized by increased tumor mutation burden, tumor neoantigen burden, PD-L1 expression, and enriched M1 macrophages. Eight independent immunotherapy datasets were validated to further corroborate our findings regarding patients in the low CMMS group who responded better to immunotherapy.
Conclusions
CMMS detection has significant utility in the prognosis of patients at an early stage and identification of potential candidates for immunotherapy.
期刊介绍:
Pathology, Research and Practice provides accessible coverage of the most recent developments across the entire field of pathology: Reviews focus on recent progress in pathology, while Comments look at interesting current problems and at hypotheses for future developments in pathology. Original Papers present novel findings on all aspects of general, anatomic and molecular pathology. Rapid Communications inform readers on preliminary findings that may be relevant for further studies and need to be communicated quickly. Teaching Cases look at new aspects or special diagnostic problems of diseases and at case reports relevant for the pathologist''s practice.