Region-specific cognitive effects of HD-tDCS in older adults: M1, DLPFC, and cerebellum

IF 2.6 3区 心理学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Roya Khanmohammadi, Mehrnaz Inanlu, Vahid Rafiee Manesh
{"title":"Region-specific cognitive effects of HD-tDCS in older adults: M1, DLPFC, and cerebellum","authors":"Roya Khanmohammadi,&nbsp;Mehrnaz Inanlu,&nbsp;Vahid Rafiee Manesh","doi":"10.1016/j.bbr.2025.115571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While regions like the primary motor cortex (M1), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and cerebellum are linked to cognitive functions, it is unclear which offers the greatest cognitive benefit. This study aimed to assess the effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on these regions, focusing on inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and working memory. This parallel, randomized, double-blinded, and controlled trial involved 80 older adults, randomly assigned to one of four groups: anodal stimulation of M1, left DLPFC, cerebellum, or sham. Inhibitory control was assessed using reaction time (RT) and rate-correct score (RCS) from a Go/No-Go task. Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B) measured processing speed and cognitive flexibility, while the backward digit span test evaluated working memory. All assessments were conducted pre- and post-stimulation. Notably, cerebellum stimulation significantly improved working memory (p = 0.010), whereas M1, DLPFC, and sham did not. Significant interaction effects emerged for TMT-A and TMT-B, with both M1 and DLPFC stimulation enhancing performance (TMT-A: p = 0.005, p = 0.025; TMT-B: p &lt; 0.001, p = 0.045, respectively), while cerebellum and sham had no significant impact. Additionally, RT and RCS showed no significant effects. Anodal stimulation of M1 and DLPFC improved cognitive flexibility and processing speed, whereas cerebellum stimulation selectively enhanced working memory. However, inhibitory control did not improve, highlighting the need for further tailored interventions. These findings underscore distinct region-specific effects of tDCS on cognitive performance in older adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8823,"journal":{"name":"Behavioural Brain Research","volume":"486 ","pages":"Article 115571"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioural Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166432825001573","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While regions like the primary motor cortex (M1), left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and cerebellum are linked to cognitive functions, it is unclear which offers the greatest cognitive benefit. This study aimed to assess the effects of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS) on these regions, focusing on inhibitory control, cognitive flexibility, and working memory. This parallel, randomized, double-blinded, and controlled trial involved 80 older adults, randomly assigned to one of four groups: anodal stimulation of M1, left DLPFC, cerebellum, or sham. Inhibitory control was assessed using reaction time (RT) and rate-correct score (RCS) from a Go/No-Go task. Trail Making Test A (TMT-A) and B (TMT-B) measured processing speed and cognitive flexibility, while the backward digit span test evaluated working memory. All assessments were conducted pre- and post-stimulation. Notably, cerebellum stimulation significantly improved working memory (p = 0.010), whereas M1, DLPFC, and sham did not. Significant interaction effects emerged for TMT-A and TMT-B, with both M1 and DLPFC stimulation enhancing performance (TMT-A: p = 0.005, p = 0.025; TMT-B: p < 0.001, p = 0.045, respectively), while cerebellum and sham had no significant impact. Additionally, RT and RCS showed no significant effects. Anodal stimulation of M1 and DLPFC improved cognitive flexibility and processing speed, whereas cerebellum stimulation selectively enhanced working memory. However, inhibitory control did not improve, highlighting the need for further tailored interventions. These findings underscore distinct region-specific effects of tDCS on cognitive performance in older adults.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavioural Brain Research
Behavioural Brain Research 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
383
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Behavioural Brain Research is an international, interdisciplinary journal dedicated to the publication of articles in the field of behavioural neuroscience, broadly defined. Contributions from the entire range of disciplines that comprise the neurosciences, behavioural sciences or cognitive sciences are appropriate, as long as the goal is to delineate the neural mechanisms underlying behaviour. Thus, studies may range from neurophysiological, neuroanatomical, neurochemical or neuropharmacological analysis of brain-behaviour relations, including the use of molecular genetic or behavioural genetic approaches, to studies that involve the use of brain imaging techniques, to neuroethological studies. Reports of original research, of major methodological advances, or of novel conceptual approaches are all encouraged. The journal will also consider critical reviews on selected topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信