Circular economy of expanded polystyrene waste: Techno-economic and life cycle assessments of chemical recycling processes

IF 9.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Eprillia Intan Fitriasari , Malik Sajawal Akhtar , Dong Won Hwang , J. Jay Liu
{"title":"Circular economy of expanded polystyrene waste: Techno-economic and life cycle assessments of chemical recycling processes","authors":"Eprillia Intan Fitriasari ,&nbsp;Malik Sajawal Akhtar ,&nbsp;Dong Won Hwang ,&nbsp;J. Jay Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145416","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global plastic waste crisis demands urgent attention due to its harmful impact on ecosystems. Chemical recycling of plastic waste offers a perspective aligned with circular economy principles and carbon neutrality, utilizing plastic waste as a carbon source to replace fossil-based feedstock. This study conducts techno-economic and life cycle assessments, based on experimental data, to demonstrate the chemical recycling of expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste through depolymerization to produce recycled styrene monomer (r-SM). Process simulations were carried out to obtain mass and energy balances and equipment sizes. The simulation outcomes served as inputs for economic and life cycle assessments. Three cases were evaluated: Case 1) low-grade r-SM (&gt;95 % purity) without using a solvent for dissolution, Case 2) low-grade r-SM (&gt;95 % purity) by using THF as a solvent for dissolution, and Case 3) a high-grade r-SM (&gt;99 % purity) without using a solvent. Case 3 offers the most economically viable option, with a minimum product selling price (MPSP) of $1.06/kg, comparable to virgin styrene monomer (v-SM). Sensitivity analysis identified EPS waste costs as the biggest influence on MPSP. The life cycle assessment (LCA) showed that all cases have a lower Global Warming Potential (GWP) than the production of v-SM, with Case 1 achieving an 89 % GWP reduction. Energy consumption is identified as the primary contributor to GWP results. These findings reveal further research prospects to explore in the pursuit of implementing EPS waste recycling.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"503 ","pages":"Article 145416"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652625007668","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The global plastic waste crisis demands urgent attention due to its harmful impact on ecosystems. Chemical recycling of plastic waste offers a perspective aligned with circular economy principles and carbon neutrality, utilizing plastic waste as a carbon source to replace fossil-based feedstock. This study conducts techno-economic and life cycle assessments, based on experimental data, to demonstrate the chemical recycling of expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste through depolymerization to produce recycled styrene monomer (r-SM). Process simulations were carried out to obtain mass and energy balances and equipment sizes. The simulation outcomes served as inputs for economic and life cycle assessments. Three cases were evaluated: Case 1) low-grade r-SM (>95 % purity) without using a solvent for dissolution, Case 2) low-grade r-SM (>95 % purity) by using THF as a solvent for dissolution, and Case 3) a high-grade r-SM (>99 % purity) without using a solvent. Case 3 offers the most economically viable option, with a minimum product selling price (MPSP) of $1.06/kg, comparable to virgin styrene monomer (v-SM). Sensitivity analysis identified EPS waste costs as the biggest influence on MPSP. The life cycle assessment (LCA) showed that all cases have a lower Global Warming Potential (GWP) than the production of v-SM, with Case 1 achieving an 89 % GWP reduction. Energy consumption is identified as the primary contributor to GWP results. These findings reveal further research prospects to explore in the pursuit of implementing EPS waste recycling.

Abstract Image

由于对生态系统造成的有害影响,全球塑料废物危机亟需关注。塑料废弃物的化学循环利用提供了一个符合循环经济原则和碳中和的视角,利用塑料废弃物作为碳源来替代化石原料。本研究以实验数据为基础,进行了技术经济和生命周期评估,以证明发泡聚苯乙烯(EPS)废料通过解聚产生再生苯乙烯单体(r-SM)的化学循环利用。进行了工艺模拟,以获得质量和能量平衡以及设备尺寸。模拟结果作为经济和生命周期评估的输入。对三种情况进行了评估:情况 1:不使用溶剂溶解的低级 r-SM(纯度 95%);情况 2:使用 THF 作为溶剂溶解的低级 r-SM(纯度 95%);情况 3:不使用溶剂溶解的高级 r-SM(纯度 99%)。情况 3 提供了最经济可行的选择,最低产品售价 (MPSP) 为 1.06 美元/千克,与原始苯乙烯单体(v-SM)相当。敏感性分析表明,发泡聚苯乙烯废料成本对 MPSP 的影响最大。生命周期评估(LCA)显示,与生产 v-SM 相比,所有情况的全球升温潜能值(GWP)都较低,其中情况 1 的全球升温潜能值降低了 89%。能源消耗被认为是造成全球升温潜能值结果的主要因素。这些发现揭示了在实施发泡聚苯乙烯废物循环利用过程中需要进一步探索的研究前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信