Regionalization of hydrological cycle changes in 31 source catchments of Yellow River Basin considering multiple hydrological variables

IF 4.7 2区 地球科学 Q1 WATER RESOURCES
Can Cao , Yang Bai , Kun Peng , Bing Han , Yongyong Zhang
{"title":"Regionalization of hydrological cycle changes in 31 source catchments of Yellow River Basin considering multiple hydrological variables","authors":"Can Cao ,&nbsp;Yang Bai ,&nbsp;Kun Peng ,&nbsp;Bing Han ,&nbsp;Yongyong Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ejrh.2025.102340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study region</h3><div>The 31 source catchments in the Yellow River Basin (YRB).</div></div><div><h3>Study focus</h3><div>Hydrological cycle changes showed remarkable regional heterogeneities, but existing studies usually focused on individual hydrological variable, which were insufficient to reflect comprehensive changes of entire hydrological cycles. In our study, different frequency metrics of runoff (R), evapotranspiration (ET) and water storage (WS) are adopted, and data source combinations are evaluated by water balance restriction. The hydrological change types are identified by classifying Sen’s slopes with statistical significance using cluster analysis.</div></div><div><h3>New hydrological insights for the region</h3><div>The water balance errors of the optimal data source combinations were −9.75–9.78 %. All the hydrological variables showed significant changes (-0.16–4.28 mm/a) in 31 source catchments from 2000 to 2020. The average slope was the largest in WS (1.65 mm/a), followed by ET (0.004 mm/a) and R (0.004 mm/a). The comprehensive changes were divided into three hydrological change types, namely significant intensification of R, ET and WS, significant intensification of ET and WS, and significant intensification of ET and WS but decreased in R, respectively. These three change types mainly occurred in the Yellow River Source Region (42 %), the north tributaries of Weihe River (10 %), and most of the Weihe and Yiluo rivers (48 %), respectively. This study is expected to provide better insights into the study of hydrological cycle in the watersheds under environmental changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 102340"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221458182500165X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study region

The 31 source catchments in the Yellow River Basin (YRB).

Study focus

Hydrological cycle changes showed remarkable regional heterogeneities, but existing studies usually focused on individual hydrological variable, which were insufficient to reflect comprehensive changes of entire hydrological cycles. In our study, different frequency metrics of runoff (R), evapotranspiration (ET) and water storage (WS) are adopted, and data source combinations are evaluated by water balance restriction. The hydrological change types are identified by classifying Sen’s slopes with statistical significance using cluster analysis.

New hydrological insights for the region

The water balance errors of the optimal data source combinations were −9.75–9.78 %. All the hydrological variables showed significant changes (-0.16–4.28 mm/a) in 31 source catchments from 2000 to 2020. The average slope was the largest in WS (1.65 mm/a), followed by ET (0.004 mm/a) and R (0.004 mm/a). The comprehensive changes were divided into three hydrological change types, namely significant intensification of R, ET and WS, significant intensification of ET and WS, and significant intensification of ET and WS but decreased in R, respectively. These three change types mainly occurred in the Yellow River Source Region (42 %), the north tributaries of Weihe River (10 %), and most of the Weihe and Yiluo rivers (48 %), respectively. This study is expected to provide better insights into the study of hydrological cycle in the watersheds under environmental changes.
考虑多水文变量的黄河流域31个源区水循环变化区划
研究区域黄河流域31个水源集水区。研究重点水循环变化具有显著的区域异质性,但现有研究多集中在单个水文变量上,不足以反映整个水循环的综合变化。本研究采用径流(R)、蒸散发(ET)和储水量(WS)的不同频率指标,并通过水平衡限制对数据源组合进行评价。利用聚类分析对具有统计学显著性的Sen’s slope进行分类,确定水文变化类型。最佳数据源组合的水平衡误差为−9.75 ~ 9.78 %。2000 ~ 2020年31个流域水文变量均呈现显著变化(-0.16 ~ 4.28 mm/a)。WS的平均坡度最大(1.65 mm/a), ET次之(0.004 mm/a), R次之(0.004 mm/a)。综合变化可分为3种水文变化类型,分别为R、ET和WS显著增强、ET和WS显著增强、ET和WS显著增强但R减弱。这三种变化类型分别主要发生在黄河源区(42 %)、渭河北支流(10 %)和大部分渭河、沂河流域(48 %)。该研究有望为环境变化下流域水文循环的研究提供更好的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies
Journal of Hydrology-Regional Studies Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth and Planetary Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.50%
发文量
284
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies publishes original research papers enhancing the science of hydrology and aiming at region-specific problems, past and future conditions, analysis, review and solutions. The journal particularly welcomes research papers that deliver new insights into region-specific hydrological processes and responses to changing conditions, as well as contributions that incorporate interdisciplinarity and translational science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信