Hsan Youssef Mehdaoui , Marouen Jouini , Josianne Lefebvre , Carmen Mihaela Neculita , Thomas Pabst , Mostafa Benzaazoua
{"title":"Geochemical stability of As-rich residues from a 20-year-old passive field biofilter used for neutral mine drainage treatment","authors":"Hsan Youssef Mehdaoui , Marouen Jouini , Josianne Lefebvre , Carmen Mihaela Neculita , Thomas Pabst , Mostafa Benzaazoua","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arsenic-rich contaminated neutral mine drainage (As-CND) is a major environmental problem frequently faced during gold and silver mining of As-bearing ores. Passive treatment systems, particularly passive biofilters, have proven to be a promising technique for As-CND treatment. However, these systems generate significant quantities of residues at the end of their operational lifespan with variable geochemical stabilities and environmental impacts that involve several parameters (e.g., water quality, treatment mechanism, leaching test, and regulatory criteria). This study evaluated the environmental behaviour of residues from a 20-year-old biofilter installed for the treatment of As-CND at the rehabilitated Wood-Cadillac mine site in northwest Quebec, Canada. Thirty samples of post-treatment residues were collected from five different locations within the system, including two within the inlets, the outlet, and at various depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm). Physicochemical and mineralogical characterizations were undertaken to understand the As removal mechanisms in the biofilter. The potential mobility of metals was assessed via static leaching tests including TCLP, SPLP, and FLT<sub>m</sub>. The results showed that the residues were characterized by high metal contents (up to 2.3 g/kg of As, 41.1 g/kg of Fe, and 19.5 g/kg of Al), mainly concentrated in the upper layers of the biofilter. Metals were precipitated in the form of oxyhydroxides in the upper and mid layers and as secondary sulfides at the bottom. Arsenic was predominantly removed through sorption onto Fe and Al oxyhydroxides in the upper layers; in contrast, reducing conditions at the bottom layers facilitated the precipitation of amorphous As sulfides (FeAsS and AsS). None of the TCLP and SPLP release results exceeded USEPA guidelines, and the residues could therefore be classified as non-hazardous with no potential risk of groundwater contamination from leachates. However, 66 % of TCLP and 20 % of SPLP concentrations exceeded D019 guidelines for As (0.2 mg/L). Additionally, FLT<sub>m</sub> results indicated a high leaching potential for As (>1 mg/L). Consequently, these residues should not be dried or crushed during ultimate disposal. These findings will contribute to improving the management strategy for As-rich residues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107618"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Arsenic-rich contaminated neutral mine drainage (As-CND) is a major environmental problem frequently faced during gold and silver mining of As-bearing ores. Passive treatment systems, particularly passive biofilters, have proven to be a promising technique for As-CND treatment. However, these systems generate significant quantities of residues at the end of their operational lifespan with variable geochemical stabilities and environmental impacts that involve several parameters (e.g., water quality, treatment mechanism, leaching test, and regulatory criteria). This study evaluated the environmental behaviour of residues from a 20-year-old biofilter installed for the treatment of As-CND at the rehabilitated Wood-Cadillac mine site in northwest Quebec, Canada. Thirty samples of post-treatment residues were collected from five different locations within the system, including two within the inlets, the outlet, and at various depths (0–30 cm, 30–60 cm, and 60–90 cm). Physicochemical and mineralogical characterizations were undertaken to understand the As removal mechanisms in the biofilter. The potential mobility of metals was assessed via static leaching tests including TCLP, SPLP, and FLTm. The results showed that the residues were characterized by high metal contents (up to 2.3 g/kg of As, 41.1 g/kg of Fe, and 19.5 g/kg of Al), mainly concentrated in the upper layers of the biofilter. Metals were precipitated in the form of oxyhydroxides in the upper and mid layers and as secondary sulfides at the bottom. Arsenic was predominantly removed through sorption onto Fe and Al oxyhydroxides in the upper layers; in contrast, reducing conditions at the bottom layers facilitated the precipitation of amorphous As sulfides (FeAsS and AsS). None of the TCLP and SPLP release results exceeded USEPA guidelines, and the residues could therefore be classified as non-hazardous with no potential risk of groundwater contamination from leachates. However, 66 % of TCLP and 20 % of SPLP concentrations exceeded D019 guidelines for As (0.2 mg/L). Additionally, FLTm results indicated a high leaching potential for As (>1 mg/L). Consequently, these residues should not be dried or crushed during ultimate disposal. These findings will contribute to improving the management strategy for As-rich residues.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.