Andresa C.B. Oliveira , Valéria Wanderley-Teixeira , Teófilo P. Langa , José V.C. R. Dantas , Herbert A.A. de Siqueira
{"title":"Chymotrypsin-like proteases contribute to Phthorimaea absoluta (Meyrick) susceptibility to Bacillus thuringiensis","authors":"Andresa C.B. Oliveira , Valéria Wanderley-Teixeira , Teófilo P. Langa , José V.C. R. Dantas , Herbert A.A. de Siqueira","doi":"10.1016/j.cropro.2025.107217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><em>Phthorimaea absoluta</em> (Meyrick) is a globally significant pest of tomato crops, capable of causing up to 100 % yield losses under high infestation levels. The continuous use of chemical insecticides has led to the evolution of resistant <em>P. absoluta</em> populations, resulting in frequent control failures in the field. This scenario extends to the entomopathogenic bacterium <em>Bacillus thuringiensis</em> (Berliner), raising concerns about resistance development due to increased usage as an alternative to chemical control. This study tested the hypothesis that Brazilian populations of <em>P. absoluta</em> have developed resistance to <em>Bt</em> formulations and investigated the role of serine proteases in this process. We conducted concentration-response assays for eight <em>P. absoluta</em> populations. Resistance variation was observed, with a 2.93-fold increase for Dipel® and a 5.83-fold increase for XenTari®. The LC80 values for XenTari® exceeded the recommended dose, indicating potential field control failures. Serine protease activities, specifically chymotrypsin and elastase, were inversely proportional to the LC50 values for Dipel®, suggesting their involvement in toxin activation. However, no correlation was found between serine protease activity and LC50 values for XenTari®, implying that these enzymes do not contribute to resistance against this formulation. The differential toxin composition of the two products likely explains the higher efficacy of <em>B. thuringiensis</em> var. <em>kurstaki</em> (Dipel®) compared to <em>B. thuringiensis</em> var. <em>aizawai</em> (XenTari®) against <em>P. absoluta</em>. The presence of the Cry1Ac toxin in Dipel® appears to enhance its efficiency in controlling <em>P. absoluta</em> while exerting selective pressure on the insect's humoral defenses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10785,"journal":{"name":"Crop Protection","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop Protection","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261219425001097","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Phthorimaea absoluta (Meyrick) is a globally significant pest of tomato crops, capable of causing up to 100 % yield losses under high infestation levels. The continuous use of chemical insecticides has led to the evolution of resistant P. absoluta populations, resulting in frequent control failures in the field. This scenario extends to the entomopathogenic bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Berliner), raising concerns about resistance development due to increased usage as an alternative to chemical control. This study tested the hypothesis that Brazilian populations of P. absoluta have developed resistance to Bt formulations and investigated the role of serine proteases in this process. We conducted concentration-response assays for eight P. absoluta populations. Resistance variation was observed, with a 2.93-fold increase for Dipel® and a 5.83-fold increase for XenTari®. The LC80 values for XenTari® exceeded the recommended dose, indicating potential field control failures. Serine protease activities, specifically chymotrypsin and elastase, were inversely proportional to the LC50 values for Dipel®, suggesting their involvement in toxin activation. However, no correlation was found between serine protease activity and LC50 values for XenTari®, implying that these enzymes do not contribute to resistance against this formulation. The differential toxin composition of the two products likely explains the higher efficacy of B. thuringiensis var. kurstaki (Dipel®) compared to B. thuringiensis var. aizawai (XenTari®) against P. absoluta. The presence of the Cry1Ac toxin in Dipel® appears to enhance its efficiency in controlling P. absoluta while exerting selective pressure on the insect's humoral defenses.
期刊介绍:
The Editors of Crop Protection especially welcome papers describing an interdisciplinary approach showing how different control strategies can be integrated into practical pest management programs, covering high and low input agricultural systems worldwide. Crop Protection particularly emphasizes the practical aspects of control in the field and for protected crops, and includes work which may lead in the near future to more effective control. The journal does not duplicate the many existing excellent biological science journals, which deal mainly with the more fundamental aspects of plant pathology, applied zoology and weed science. Crop Protection covers all practical aspects of pest, disease and weed control, including the following topics:
-Abiotic damage-
Agronomic control methods-
Assessment of pest and disease damage-
Molecular methods for the detection and assessment of pests and diseases-
Biological control-
Biorational pesticides-
Control of animal pests of world crops-
Control of diseases of crop plants caused by microorganisms-
Control of weeds and integrated management-
Economic considerations-
Effects of plant growth regulators-
Environmental benefits of reduced pesticide use-
Environmental effects of pesticides-
Epidemiology of pests and diseases in relation to control-
GM Crops, and genetic engineering applications-
Importance and control of postharvest crop losses-
Integrated control-
Interrelationships and compatibility among different control strategies-
Invasive species as they relate to implications for crop protection-
Pesticide application methods-
Pest management-
Phytobiomes for pest and disease control-
Resistance management-
Sampling and monitoring schemes for diseases, nematodes, pests and weeds.