Breathing environment: Exploring the feasibility and efficacy of personalized, light-guided slow breathing while performing two computer tasks in a simulated office environment
Markus Canazei , Luis Glenzer , Siegmund Staggl , Verena Dresen , Johannes Weninger , Elisabeth Margarete Weiss
{"title":"Breathing environment: Exploring the feasibility and efficacy of personalized, light-guided slow breathing while performing two computer tasks in a simulated office environment","authors":"Markus Canazei , Luis Glenzer , Siegmund Staggl , Verena Dresen , Johannes Weninger , Elisabeth Margarete Weiss","doi":"10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Screen-based tasks are known to significantly affect stress levels and well-being. Slow Breathing (SB) is a promising intervention to reduce stress by increasing parasympathetic nervous system activity. This study investigated the feasibility and immediate stress-reducing effects of light-guided SB during two computer-based tasks in a simulated office environment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Eighty young, healthy adults participated in a randomized crossover study with two study conditions while performing computer tasks: a personalized, light-guided SB and an artificial office lighting and a control condition with artificial office lighting only. Participants completed an attention task (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) and a decision task (Balloon Analogue Risk Task) in both conditions. Measurements included heart rate variability via root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), subjective stress levels, and usability metrics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Light-guided SB showed a significant increase in RMSSD for both tasks. Perceived stress levels were also significantly lower after performing the decision task with SB. From a performance perspective, SB resulted in reduced attentional performance and had no effect on decision making. Usability ratings complemented these findings, showing higher perceived distraction with light-guided SB, but hedonic quality ratings were more favourable.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Additional light-guided SB, although costly in cognitive resources, effectively promotes physiological self-regulatory processes in situ in two cognitive tasks and also reduces perceived stress in a higher executive cognitive task. These findings highlight the potential of SB for occupational stress management without disrupting work flow.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72681,"journal":{"name":"Computers in human behavior reports","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100661"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in human behavior reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2451958825000764","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Screen-based tasks are known to significantly affect stress levels and well-being. Slow Breathing (SB) is a promising intervention to reduce stress by increasing parasympathetic nervous system activity. This study investigated the feasibility and immediate stress-reducing effects of light-guided SB during two computer-based tasks in a simulated office environment.
Methods
Eighty young, healthy adults participated in a randomized crossover study with two study conditions while performing computer tasks: a personalized, light-guided SB and an artificial office lighting and a control condition with artificial office lighting only. Participants completed an attention task (Psychomotor Vigilance Task) and a decision task (Balloon Analogue Risk Task) in both conditions. Measurements included heart rate variability via root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD), subjective stress levels, and usability metrics.
Results
Light-guided SB showed a significant increase in RMSSD for both tasks. Perceived stress levels were also significantly lower after performing the decision task with SB. From a performance perspective, SB resulted in reduced attentional performance and had no effect on decision making. Usability ratings complemented these findings, showing higher perceived distraction with light-guided SB, but hedonic quality ratings were more favourable.
Discussion
Additional light-guided SB, although costly in cognitive resources, effectively promotes physiological self-regulatory processes in situ in two cognitive tasks and also reduces perceived stress in a higher executive cognitive task. These findings highlight the potential of SB for occupational stress management without disrupting work flow.