Impact of energy justice on energy poverty from the perspective of gender inequality: A case study in northern China

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Wenlong Zhou , Wenxian Jiao , Kang Wang , Zilu Liu , Bingjie Zhou , Xuanxuan Guo , Hao Wang
{"title":"Impact of energy justice on energy poverty from the perspective of gender inequality: A case study in northern China","authors":"Wenlong Zhou ,&nbsp;Wenxian Jiao ,&nbsp;Kang Wang ,&nbsp;Zilu Liu ,&nbsp;Bingjie Zhou ,&nbsp;Xuanxuan Guo ,&nbsp;Hao Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.esd.2025.101725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In the energy poverty governance and justice transformation process, gender inequality has become increasingly prominent, and the issue of household energy poverty urgently needs to be explored from the perspective of energy justice. An energy justice analysis framework was applied based on gender inequality in energy consumption. Data were analyzed from 359 rural households during 2022 in Xiangcheng County, which is a typical rural area in northern China. The multidimensional energy poverty characteristics were measured, and the mechanisms associated with the effects of energy justice factors on energy poverty were explored based on logistic regression modeling. The results showed that the incidence of energy poverty was 33.43 % and the low annual income of households was a key factor that pushed households into energy poverty. Energy justice played an important positive role in alleviating household energy poverty by enhancing the fairness of energy distribution, decision-making influence of women, and cognitive abilities. In particular, for every unit increase in distributive justice and recognition justice, energy poverty decreased by 1.7 % and 8.1 %, respectively. Procedural justice had a negative relationship with alleviating energy poverty. For every unit increase in procedural justice, energy poverty increased by 8.6 %. Examining the mechanism related to energy poverty based on gender inequality from an energy justice perspective can expand the research framework for energy poverty mechanisms and help policy-makers better address energy poverty issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49209,"journal":{"name":"Energy for Sustainable Development","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 101725"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0973082625000754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the energy poverty governance and justice transformation process, gender inequality has become increasingly prominent, and the issue of household energy poverty urgently needs to be explored from the perspective of energy justice. An energy justice analysis framework was applied based on gender inequality in energy consumption. Data were analyzed from 359 rural households during 2022 in Xiangcheng County, which is a typical rural area in northern China. The multidimensional energy poverty characteristics were measured, and the mechanisms associated with the effects of energy justice factors on energy poverty were explored based on logistic regression modeling. The results showed that the incidence of energy poverty was 33.43 % and the low annual income of households was a key factor that pushed households into energy poverty. Energy justice played an important positive role in alleviating household energy poverty by enhancing the fairness of energy distribution, decision-making influence of women, and cognitive abilities. In particular, for every unit increase in distributive justice and recognition justice, energy poverty decreased by 1.7 % and 8.1 %, respectively. Procedural justice had a negative relationship with alleviating energy poverty. For every unit increase in procedural justice, energy poverty increased by 8.6 %. Examining the mechanism related to energy poverty based on gender inequality from an energy justice perspective can expand the research framework for energy poverty mechanisms and help policy-makers better address energy poverty issues.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy for Sustainable Development
Energy for Sustainable Development ENERGY & FUELS-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
187
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the International Energy Initiative, Energy for Sustainable Development is the journal for decision makers, managers, consultants, policy makers, planners and researchers in both government and non-government organizations. It publishes original research and reviews about energy in developing countries, sustainable development, energy resources, technologies, policies and interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信