Exploring new predictors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Daniela Denis Di Martino , Elisa Sabattini , Marco Parasiliti , Lucrezia Viscioni , Elena Zaccone , Serena Cerri , Gabriele Tinè , Enrico Ferrazzi
{"title":"Exploring new predictors for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy","authors":"Daniela Denis Di Martino ,&nbsp;Elisa Sabattini ,&nbsp;Marco Parasiliti ,&nbsp;Lucrezia Viscioni ,&nbsp;Elena Zaccone ,&nbsp;Serena Cerri ,&nbsp;Gabriele Tinè ,&nbsp;Enrico Ferrazzi","doi":"10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2025.102598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The best performing predicting Bayesian algorithm for preeclampsia, endorsed by FIGO, identifies high-risk women at first trimester screening who benefits of a closer monitoring and possibly preventive measures. Unfortunately, the most frequent late term and term preeclampsia are less efficiently predicted. This algorithm is based on statistical assumptions at odds with the physiopathology: preeclampsia is a disease and not a syndrome, as we know it is, and the contingent time-based criteria according to which all pregnancies if not terminated by nature should develop this “disease”.</div><div>In addition to this, we know that gestational hypertension might cause in fifty percent of cases severe outcome, comparable to preeclampsia. The very definition of preeclampsia as proteinuric hypertension is now extended to hypertension associated with other end-organ damage, including fetal growth restriction (FGR), this latter condition proceeding, in early onset cases, hypertension. Predicting phenotypes of hypertensive Disorders of pregnancy (HDP) could better help clinical practice.</div><div>This study reports exploratory observations in women resulted at high and low risk at first trimester screening followed up at second and third trimester, to term. The co-variates interrogated were sFlt1/PlGF ratio, the uterine arteries PI, the systemic vascular resistances (SVR), maternal total body water and visceral fat.</div><div>Women were classified as HDP-AGA, HDP-FGR, normotensive-FGR and uneventful pregnancies (controls). We performed a longitudinal Bayesian multivariate mixed-effects model corrected both for pre-gestational BMI and trimester of analysis.</div><div>The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and SVR confirmed their significant difference in HDP-AGA, in normotensive FGR, and HDP-FGR along the three trimesters from controls, but with different strength along the three trimesters.</div><div>The bioimpedance analysis of total body water and visceral fat confirmed the association of these co-factors with women who will develop HDP-AGA.</div><div>The strength of longitudinal changes observed, even on a limited number of cases, provide evidence that Bayesian algorithms applied at screening tests at different gestational ages, should be based on co-variates significantly associated either with HDP-FGR or with HDP-AGA provided that the main causative co-factors involved are adopted by predictive models aimed at these distinct diseases.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50732,"journal":{"name":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 102598"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1521693425000227","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The best performing predicting Bayesian algorithm for preeclampsia, endorsed by FIGO, identifies high-risk women at first trimester screening who benefits of a closer monitoring and possibly preventive measures. Unfortunately, the most frequent late term and term preeclampsia are less efficiently predicted. This algorithm is based on statistical assumptions at odds with the physiopathology: preeclampsia is a disease and not a syndrome, as we know it is, and the contingent time-based criteria according to which all pregnancies if not terminated by nature should develop this “disease”.
In addition to this, we know that gestational hypertension might cause in fifty percent of cases severe outcome, comparable to preeclampsia. The very definition of preeclampsia as proteinuric hypertension is now extended to hypertension associated with other end-organ damage, including fetal growth restriction (FGR), this latter condition proceeding, in early onset cases, hypertension. Predicting phenotypes of hypertensive Disorders of pregnancy (HDP) could better help clinical practice.
This study reports exploratory observations in women resulted at high and low risk at first trimester screening followed up at second and third trimester, to term. The co-variates interrogated were sFlt1/PlGF ratio, the uterine arteries PI, the systemic vascular resistances (SVR), maternal total body water and visceral fat.
Women were classified as HDP-AGA, HDP-FGR, normotensive-FGR and uneventful pregnancies (controls). We performed a longitudinal Bayesian multivariate mixed-effects model corrected both for pre-gestational BMI and trimester of analysis.
The sFlt-1/PlGF ratio and SVR confirmed their significant difference in HDP-AGA, in normotensive FGR, and HDP-FGR along the three trimesters from controls, but with different strength along the three trimesters.
The bioimpedance analysis of total body water and visceral fat confirmed the association of these co-factors with women who will develop HDP-AGA.
The strength of longitudinal changes observed, even on a limited number of cases, provide evidence that Bayesian algorithms applied at screening tests at different gestational ages, should be based on co-variates significantly associated either with HDP-FGR or with HDP-AGA provided that the main causative co-factors involved are adopted by predictive models aimed at these distinct diseases.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
113
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: In practical paperback format, each 200 page topic-based issue of Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology will provide a comprehensive review of current clinical practice and thinking within the specialties of obstetrics and gynaecology. All chapters take the form of practical, evidence-based reviews that seek to address key clinical issues of diagnosis, treatment and patient management. Each issue follows a problem-orientated approach that focuses on the key questions to be addressed, clearly defining what is known and not known. Management will be described in practical terms so that it can be applied to the individual patient.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信