Couple-based group intervention for social isolation in colorectal cancer couples: A pilot study

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Can Wang , Xiaoke Qiu , Jiayu Mao , Xueli Yang , Yi Lin , Jie Zhao , Qiuping Li
{"title":"Couple-based group intervention for social isolation in colorectal cancer couples: A pilot study","authors":"Can Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Qiu ,&nbsp;Jiayu Mao ,&nbsp;Xueli Yang ,&nbsp;Yi Lin ,&nbsp;Jie Zhao ,&nbsp;Qiuping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ejon.2025.102878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers frequently experience social isolation. Nevertheless, interventions targeting social isolation mitigation in CRC dyads remain limited. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of couple-based group intervention for alleviating social isolation in Chinese CRC couples.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The study utilized a single-arm pre-post intervention design, comprising a structured six-session group program that blended face-to-face and online components. Feasibility was evaluated through recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed via a mixed-methods approach combining post-intervention surveys with open-ended interviews. Outcome measures included validated instruments: the General Alienation Scale, Lubben Social Network Scale-6, Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form version 2, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and Perceived Social Support Scale.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The program demonstrated feasibility with a 62.5 % recruitment rate and an 85 % retention rate. Quantitative and qualitative data supported its acceptability through CRC couples' overall satisfaction. Effectiveness was evidenced by medium effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.54–0.59) on both subjective and objective measures of social isolation and most secondary outcomes in CRC patients and spousal caregivers. Notably, spousal caregivers showed borderline significant improvements in physical health (d = 0.50, <em>P</em> = 0.056) and social support (d = 0.49, <em>P</em> = 0.063).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the couple-based group intervention for social isolation in CRC couples were confirmed. These findings warrant a large-scale randomized controlled trial to rigorously evaluate the intervention's long-term effectiveness and potential for clinical implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51048,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102878"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462388925001024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and their spousal caregivers frequently experience social isolation. Nevertheless, interventions targeting social isolation mitigation in CRC dyads remain limited. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of couple-based group intervention for alleviating social isolation in Chinese CRC couples.

Methods

The study utilized a single-arm pre-post intervention design, comprising a structured six-session group program that blended face-to-face and online components. Feasibility was evaluated through recruitment and retention rates. Acceptability was assessed via a mixed-methods approach combining post-intervention surveys with open-ended interviews. Outcome measures included validated instruments: the General Alienation Scale, Lubben Social Network Scale-6, Medical Outcomes Study 12-item Short-Form version 2, Dyadic Coping Inventory, and Perceived Social Support Scale.

Results

The program demonstrated feasibility with a 62.5 % recruitment rate and an 85 % retention rate. Quantitative and qualitative data supported its acceptability through CRC couples' overall satisfaction. Effectiveness was evidenced by medium effect sizes (Cohen's d = 0.54–0.59) on both subjective and objective measures of social isolation and most secondary outcomes in CRC patients and spousal caregivers. Notably, spousal caregivers showed borderline significant improvements in physical health (d = 0.50, P = 0.056) and social support (d = 0.49, P = 0.063).

Conclusion

The feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary effects of the couple-based group intervention for social isolation in CRC couples were confirmed. These findings warrant a large-scale randomized controlled trial to rigorously evaluate the intervention's long-term effectiveness and potential for clinical implementation.
以夫妇为基础的群体干预对结直肠癌夫妇的社会隔离:一项试点研究
目的结直肠癌(CRC)患者及其配偶照顾者经常经历社会孤立。然而,针对减轻结直肠癌患者社会隔离的干预措施仍然有限。本初步研究旨在评估以夫妻为基础的群体干预减轻中国结直肠癌夫妇社会隔离的可行性、可接受性和初步效果。方法本研究采用单臂干预前和干预后设计,包括一个结构化的六期小组项目,混合了面对面和在线的组成部分。通过招聘和留任率评估可行性。通过结合干预后调查和开放式访谈的混合方法评估可接受性。结果测量包括经过验证的工具:一般疏离量表,Lubben社会网络量表-6,医疗结果研究12项短表版本2,二元应对量表和感知社会支持量表。结果以62.5%的录取率和85%的留用率证明了该方案的可行性。定量和定性数据通过CRC夫妇的总体满意度支持其可接受性。在CRC患者和配偶照顾者的社会隔离和大多数次要结局的主观和客观测量中,中等效应量(Cohen’s d = 0.54-0.59)证明了有效性。值得注意的是,配偶照顾者在身体健康(d = 0.50, P = 0.056)和社会支持(d = 0.49, P = 0.063)方面表现出边缘性显著改善。结论以夫妻为基础的群体干预对结直肠癌夫妻的社会隔离具有可行性、可接受性和初步效果。这些发现需要进行大规模随机对照试验,以严格评估干预措施的长期有效性和临床实施的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
109
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Oncology Nursing is an international journal which publishes research of direct relevance to patient care, nurse education, management and policy development. EJON is proud to be the official journal of the European Oncology Nursing Society. The journal publishes the following types of papers: • Original research articles • Review articles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信