Are we moving online? Assessing the interactions between telework and grocery purchases, eating out and meal deliveries

IF 6.3 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS
Rui Colaço , João de Abreu e Silva
{"title":"Are we moving online? Assessing the interactions between telework and grocery purchases, eating out and meal deliveries","authors":"Rui Colaço ,&nbsp;João de Abreu e Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.tra.2025.104461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the impact of telework on shopping and travel behavior, explicitly addressing how increased telework adoption may influence online and in-store shopping activities and how these relationships might be mediated by the period of the week in which they occur, namely workdays vs weekends. The results show that frequent teleworkers tend to substitute in-store grocery shopping over weekends with online grocery shopping, especially during workdays, while also being more inclined to order meals online, in general, than to eat out on weekends. This behavior presents a stark contrast with those showing an in-store preference. In-store shopping preference is positively associated with activities to which telework frequency is negative or non-significant, such as shopping in-store for groceries on weekends and eating out on workdays and weekends. In-store shoppers will be older non-teleworkers, with older, less educated, and less affluent individuals being the ones less likely to telework and more likely to hold to previous habits built around a commute. Moreover, since non-teleworkers with a preference for online shopping also engage in meal deliveries during workdays and online grocery shopping on weekends, the expected delivery uptake can potentially impact residential areas through (e.g.) increased noise, curbside occupation and pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. These shifts in workplace preference and preferred shopping channels will influence travel demand, the location of economic activities, and how cities are structured, and will have to be considered in the development of policies that maximize their benefits while mitigating potential adverse effects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49421,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 104461"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part A-Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425000898","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explores the impact of telework on shopping and travel behavior, explicitly addressing how increased telework adoption may influence online and in-store shopping activities and how these relationships might be mediated by the period of the week in which they occur, namely workdays vs weekends. The results show that frequent teleworkers tend to substitute in-store grocery shopping over weekends with online grocery shopping, especially during workdays, while also being more inclined to order meals online, in general, than to eat out on weekends. This behavior presents a stark contrast with those showing an in-store preference. In-store shopping preference is positively associated with activities to which telework frequency is negative or non-significant, such as shopping in-store for groceries on weekends and eating out on workdays and weekends. In-store shoppers will be older non-teleworkers, with older, less educated, and less affluent individuals being the ones less likely to telework and more likely to hold to previous habits built around a commute. Moreover, since non-teleworkers with a preference for online shopping also engage in meal deliveries during workdays and online grocery shopping on weekends, the expected delivery uptake can potentially impact residential areas through (e.g.) increased noise, curbside occupation and pedestrian-vehicle conflicts. These shifts in workplace preference and preferred shopping channels will influence travel demand, the location of economic activities, and how cities are structured, and will have to be considered in the development of policies that maximize their benefits while mitigating potential adverse effects.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
7.80%
发文量
257
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: Transportation Research: Part A contains papers of general interest in all passenger and freight transportation modes: policy analysis, formulation and evaluation; planning; interaction with the political, socioeconomic and physical environment; design, management and evaluation of transportation systems. Topics are approached from any discipline or perspective: economics, engineering, sociology, psychology, etc. Case studies, survey and expository papers are included, as are articles which contribute to unification of the field, or to an understanding of the comparative aspects of different systems. Papers which assess the scope for technological innovation within a social or political framework are also published. The journal is international, and places equal emphasis on the problems of industrialized and non-industrialized regions. Part A''s aims and scope are complementary to Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies and Part D: Transport and Environment. Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review. Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. The complete set forms the most cohesive and comprehensive reference of current research in transportation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信