Asymmetric nexus of green energy inclusion and green trade spillover effects on economic growth: Insights from China's experience for EAC-6

IF 7.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Elias Gakuru, Shaohua Yang, Ling Yang, Yuting Wang, Olufemi Samuel Adegboyo, J․D Ndayambaje, Chaudhary Saad Ullah Hussain
{"title":"Asymmetric nexus of green energy inclusion and green trade spillover effects on economic growth: Insights from China's experience for EAC-6","authors":"Elias Gakuru,&nbsp;Shaohua Yang,&nbsp;Ling Yang,&nbsp;Yuting Wang,&nbsp;Olufemi Samuel Adegboyo,&nbsp;J․D Ndayambaje,&nbsp;Chaudhary Saad Ullah Hussain","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.03.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The quick progress of green energy solutions has led to increased academic focus on their economic consequences. This study provides a comparative study regarding the asymmetric nexus among the novel green energy inclusivity index (IGE), novel green trade spillover effects (GTS), and economic growth. The analysis employed a non-linear autoregressive distributed lagged model (NARDL) and asymmetric causality test using data from 1990 to 2022 in the China and East Africa Community (EAC-6). The findings revealed a pronounced asymmetric convergence across the variables in both countries, with IGE and GTS negative shocks having a stronger impact than positive ones. In insights from China's Experience for EAC, while these results keep robust after conducting quantile regressions and other robust checks, in China both novel green energy inclusivity and novel green trade spillover effects positive shocks have a stronger effect on economic growth than EAC for both short and long terms. Furthermore, the feedback green energy-led growth hypothesis and the feedback green trade spillover effects-led growth hypothesis are confirmed in both countries. As a lesson learned, this study suggests the EAC countries take note of China's emphasis on developing a robust domestic manufacturing and supply chain for renewable energy technologies to potentially enhance more sustainable growth.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"86 ","pages":"Pages 475-493"},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0313592625001018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quick progress of green energy solutions has led to increased academic focus on their economic consequences. This study provides a comparative study regarding the asymmetric nexus among the novel green energy inclusivity index (IGE), novel green trade spillover effects (GTS), and economic growth. The analysis employed a non-linear autoregressive distributed lagged model (NARDL) and asymmetric causality test using data from 1990 to 2022 in the China and East Africa Community (EAC-6). The findings revealed a pronounced asymmetric convergence across the variables in both countries, with IGE and GTS negative shocks having a stronger impact than positive ones. In insights from China's Experience for EAC, while these results keep robust after conducting quantile regressions and other robust checks, in China both novel green energy inclusivity and novel green trade spillover effects positive shocks have a stronger effect on economic growth than EAC for both short and long terms. Furthermore, the feedback green energy-led growth hypothesis and the feedback green trade spillover effects-led growth hypothesis are confirmed in both countries. As a lesson learned, this study suggests the EAC countries take note of China's emphasis on developing a robust domestic manufacturing and supply chain for renewable energy technologies to potentially enhance more sustainable growth.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信