{"title":"Dynamic responses and seismic loss assessment of self-centering frames under pulse-like ground motions","authors":"Boyang Liu , Xiao Lu , Longhe Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.engstruct.2025.120246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Near-fault ground motions (NFGMs) are characterized by significant velocity pulses, which pose a heightened seismic risk to structures and have garnered increasing attention in recent years. However, quantitative research on the seismic loss of self-centering structures under NFGMs remains limited. The study systematically investigated the dynamic responses, damage states, and post-earthquake seismic loss of self-centering friction frames subjected to NFGMs with varying normalized pulse periods (<em>T</em><sub>p</sub>/<em>T</em><sub>1</sub>). A five-story self-centering friction frame is designed, and a simplified numerical analysis model is developed using the finite element software MSC.Marc. A total of 8 sets of NFGMs, with <em>T</em><sub>p</sub>/<em>T</em><sub>1</sub> ratios ranging from 0.5 to 6, are selected for analysis. Incremental dynamic analysis is conducted to quantify the influence of <em>T</em><sub>p</sub>/<em>T</em><sub>1</sub> on the self-centering frame’s dynamic responses, damage states, and seismic loss. The results reveal that as the intensity of ground motion increases, the normalized pulse period that most adversely affects the inter-story drift ratio and structural damage also tends to rise. Additionally, NFGMs with a <em>T</em><sub>p</sub>/<em>T</em><sub>1</sub> ratio of 0.5 are more likely to induce higher-order vibration modes of the self-centering frame at low seismic intensity. When seismic loss is used as the seismic performance indicator, NFGMs with <em>T</em><sub>p</sub>/<em>T</em><sub>1</sub> of between 2 and 4 are found to cause the most significant seismic loss of the self-centering frame.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11763,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Structures","volume":"334 ","pages":"Article 120246"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141029625006376","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Near-fault ground motions (NFGMs) are characterized by significant velocity pulses, which pose a heightened seismic risk to structures and have garnered increasing attention in recent years. However, quantitative research on the seismic loss of self-centering structures under NFGMs remains limited. The study systematically investigated the dynamic responses, damage states, and post-earthquake seismic loss of self-centering friction frames subjected to NFGMs with varying normalized pulse periods (Tp/T1). A five-story self-centering friction frame is designed, and a simplified numerical analysis model is developed using the finite element software MSC.Marc. A total of 8 sets of NFGMs, with Tp/T1 ratios ranging from 0.5 to 6, are selected for analysis. Incremental dynamic analysis is conducted to quantify the influence of Tp/T1 on the self-centering frame’s dynamic responses, damage states, and seismic loss. The results reveal that as the intensity of ground motion increases, the normalized pulse period that most adversely affects the inter-story drift ratio and structural damage also tends to rise. Additionally, NFGMs with a Tp/T1 ratio of 0.5 are more likely to induce higher-order vibration modes of the self-centering frame at low seismic intensity. When seismic loss is used as the seismic performance indicator, NFGMs with Tp/T1 of between 2 and 4 are found to cause the most significant seismic loss of the self-centering frame.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Structures provides a forum for a broad blend of scientific and technical papers to reflect the evolving needs of the structural engineering and structural mechanics communities. Particularly welcome are contributions dealing with applications of structural engineering and mechanics principles in all areas of technology. The journal aspires to a broad and integrated coverage of the effects of dynamic loadings and of the modelling techniques whereby the structural response to these loadings may be computed.
The scope of Engineering Structures encompasses, but is not restricted to, the following areas: infrastructure engineering; earthquake engineering; structure-fluid-soil interaction; wind engineering; fire engineering; blast engineering; structural reliability/stability; life assessment/integrity; structural health monitoring; multi-hazard engineering; structural dynamics; optimization; expert systems; experimental modelling; performance-based design; multiscale analysis; value engineering.
Topics of interest include: tall buildings; innovative structures; environmentally responsive structures; bridges; stadiums; commercial and public buildings; transmission towers; television and telecommunication masts; foldable structures; cooling towers; plates and shells; suspension structures; protective structures; smart structures; nuclear reactors; dams; pressure vessels; pipelines; tunnels.
Engineering Structures also publishes review articles, short communications and discussions, book reviews, and a diary on international events related to any aspect of structural engineering.