Evolving surgical techniques for hepatolithiasis: A retrospective analysis of 164 liver resections at a Western center

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Surgery Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1016/j.surg.2025.109330
Agostino Maria De Rose MD, PhD, Francesco Taliente MD, Elena Panettieri MD, PhD, Giovanni Moschetta MD, Francesco Belia MD, Francesco Ardito MD, PhD, Felice Giuliante MD
{"title":"Evolving surgical techniques for hepatolithiasis: A retrospective analysis of 164 liver resections at a Western center","authors":"Agostino Maria De Rose MD, PhD,&nbsp;Francesco Taliente MD,&nbsp;Elena Panettieri MD, PhD,&nbsp;Giovanni Moschetta MD,&nbsp;Francesco Belia MD,&nbsp;Francesco Ardito MD, PhD,&nbsp;Felice Giuliante MD","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2025.109330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To assess the outcomes of liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis in a Western population, emphasizing the evolution of surgical techniques, including minimally invasive surgery, and their impact on patient outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We performed a retrospective analysis of 164 patients who underwent liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Data included demographics, surgical techniques, complications, and long-term outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery was introduced and progressively adopted, and its outcomes were compared with open surgery using propensity score matching. This represents the largest Western dataset on liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis published to date.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Liver resections were predominantly unilateral (96%) and commonly targeted the left liver (65%). Minimally invasive surgery use increased to 60% in the most recent period, showing reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared with open surgery. Postoperative complications included bile fistula (16%) and septic events (30%). Independent risk factors for bile fistula were previous cholangitis (odds ratio, 4.7; <em>P</em> = .006) and major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 7.8; <em>P</em> = .002). Septic complications were associated with previous cholangitis (odds ratio, 2.3; <em>P</em> = .026), bilateral lithiasis (odds ratio, 4.0; <em>P</em> = .010), and major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 3.5; <em>P</em> = .003), with minimally invasive surgery providing a protective effect (odds ratio, 0.34; <em>P</em> = .028). Long-term follow-up revealed a 20% recurrence rate, linked to incomplete intraoperative stone clearance (hazard ratio, 2.645; <em>P</em> = .019) and biliary fistula (hazard ratio, 2.799; <em>P</em> = .016). Cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 6.6%, underscoring the need for surveillance.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Liver resection is an effective, curative treatment for primary intrahepatic lithiasis in Western populations. Minimally invasive surgery advancements significantly improve short-term outcomes, bridging the East-West gap in primary intrahepatic lithiasis management and highlighting the importance of individualized surgical approaches.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 109330"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0039606025001825","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To assess the outcomes of liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis in a Western population, emphasizing the evolution of surgical techniques, including minimally invasive surgery, and their impact on patient outcomes.

Methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of 164 patients who underwent liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy. Data included demographics, surgical techniques, complications, and long-term outcomes. Minimally invasive surgery was introduced and progressively adopted, and its outcomes were compared with open surgery using propensity score matching. This represents the largest Western dataset on liver resection for primary intrahepatic lithiasis published to date.

Results

Liver resections were predominantly unilateral (96%) and commonly targeted the left liver (65%). Minimally invasive surgery use increased to 60% in the most recent period, showing reduced morbidity and shorter hospital stays compared with open surgery. Postoperative complications included bile fistula (16%) and septic events (30%). Independent risk factors for bile fistula were previous cholangitis (odds ratio, 4.7; P = .006) and major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 7.8; P = .002). Septic complications were associated with previous cholangitis (odds ratio, 2.3; P = .026), bilateral lithiasis (odds ratio, 4.0; P = .010), and major hepatectomy (odds ratio, 3.5; P = .003), with minimally invasive surgery providing a protective effect (odds ratio, 0.34; P = .028). Long-term follow-up revealed a 20% recurrence rate, linked to incomplete intraoperative stone clearance (hazard ratio, 2.645; P = .019) and biliary fistula (hazard ratio, 2.799; P = .016). Cholangiocarcinoma occurred in 6.6%, underscoring the need for surveillance.

Conclusion

Liver resection is an effective, curative treatment for primary intrahepatic lithiasis in Western populations. Minimally invasive surgery advancements significantly improve short-term outcomes, bridging the East-West gap in primary intrahepatic lithiasis management and highlighting the importance of individualized surgical approaches.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgery
Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
687
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信