Investigation on the workability, mechanical properties and carbon emission performance of fiber-reinforced geopolymer recycled concrete (FRGRC)

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Jin Guo , Qingwu Liu , Haiyang Pan , Yudong Sun , Boyu Guo
{"title":"Investigation on the workability, mechanical properties and carbon emission performance of fiber-reinforced geopolymer recycled concrete (FRGRC)","authors":"Jin Guo ,&nbsp;Qingwu Liu ,&nbsp;Haiyang Pan ,&nbsp;Yudong Sun ,&nbsp;Boyu Guo","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Geopolymer concrete represents an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional cement, offering potential for reducing carbon emissions and recycling industrial waste. Fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FRGRC) has emerged as a promising material, though challenges persist regarding workability control and achieving adequate strength and ductility. To accelerate the adoption of FRGRC in practical engineering applications and fully capitalize on its low-carbon benefits, this study investigates the influence of various controlling factors on the workability and mechanical properties of FRGRC through a series of experiments. The factors under scrutiny include water-to-binder ratio (w/b, 0.4–0.5), alkali activator concentration (c, 0.2–0.4), blast furnace slag content (BFS/b, 0–1), and polyethylene (PE) fiber content (FC, 0 %-2 %). Findings indicate that while a higher w/b ratio improves workability, it compromises strength; conversely, increasing BFS/b ratio enhances strength but detracts from workability. Higher concentrations of alkali activator improve both workability and strength but delay setting times. PE fibers significantly boost bridging strength and ductility by up to 45 % and one-third respectively when FC is increased by 0.5 %, although excessive FC can diminish workability. An optimal mix design was identified: 0.5 w/b, 0.4c, 50 % BFS/b, and 1.5 % FC, which ensures satisfactory workability and high strength. A predictive formula for compressive strength based on different mix designs was developed. Additionally, incorporating carbon emission data, a formula relating mix ratios to carbon emissions and strength was proposed to guide preliminary FRGRC design, and avoided the situation when pursuing low carbon emissions results in excessively low strength. Through comparison, it is shown that the low-carbon performance and strength of FRGRC are both superior to those of ordinary concrete. This research provides valuable insights for optimizing FRGRC design and assessing carbon emissions in practical applications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"474 ","pages":"Article 141004"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061825011523","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Geopolymer concrete represents an environmentally friendly alternative to traditional cement, offering potential for reducing carbon emissions and recycling industrial waste. Fiber-reinforced geopolymer concrete (FRGRC) has emerged as a promising material, though challenges persist regarding workability control and achieving adequate strength and ductility. To accelerate the adoption of FRGRC in practical engineering applications and fully capitalize on its low-carbon benefits, this study investigates the influence of various controlling factors on the workability and mechanical properties of FRGRC through a series of experiments. The factors under scrutiny include water-to-binder ratio (w/b, 0.4–0.5), alkali activator concentration (c, 0.2–0.4), blast furnace slag content (BFS/b, 0–1), and polyethylene (PE) fiber content (FC, 0 %-2 %). Findings indicate that while a higher w/b ratio improves workability, it compromises strength; conversely, increasing BFS/b ratio enhances strength but detracts from workability. Higher concentrations of alkali activator improve both workability and strength but delay setting times. PE fibers significantly boost bridging strength and ductility by up to 45 % and one-third respectively when FC is increased by 0.5 %, although excessive FC can diminish workability. An optimal mix design was identified: 0.5 w/b, 0.4c, 50 % BFS/b, and 1.5 % FC, which ensures satisfactory workability and high strength. A predictive formula for compressive strength based on different mix designs was developed. Additionally, incorporating carbon emission data, a formula relating mix ratios to carbon emissions and strength was proposed to guide preliminary FRGRC design, and avoided the situation when pursuing low carbon emissions results in excessively low strength. Through comparison, it is shown that the low-carbon performance and strength of FRGRC are both superior to those of ordinary concrete. This research provides valuable insights for optimizing FRGRC design and assessing carbon emissions in practical applications.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信