Scale-dependent variation in leaf functional traits clarifies mechanisms of invasion

IF 5.4 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1111/ecog.07566
Andrea C. Westerband, Tiffany M. Knight, Kasey E. Barton
{"title":"Scale-dependent variation in leaf functional traits clarifies mechanisms of invasion","authors":"Andrea C. Westerband,&nbsp;Tiffany M. Knight,&nbsp;Kasey E. Barton","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparing the functional traits of co-occurring native and invasive plant species can offer insight regarding mechanisms of invasion. Previous studies have failed to reach a consensus, indicating that the extent of trait differences between native and invasives might depend on the environmental context and on the spatial grain of the analysis. Here we evaluate the scale-dependency of native–invader trait comparisons within the Hawaiian Archipelago, a globally important region of high endemicity and high invasibility. We evaluated trait (e.g. gas exchange, leaf nutrient concentration, specific leaf area) differences locally and regionally (i.e. within and across islands) and found that while invasives are more resource acquisitive at the regional scale, native–invader differences are highly idiosyncratic at localized scales, varying both in direction and magnitude within islands. Our findings clarify how region-wide species comparisons may fail to characterize interactions happening at local scales, thereby misleading or obscuring the mechanisms underlying invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparing the functional traits of co-occurring native and invasive plant species can offer insight regarding mechanisms of invasion. Previous studies have failed to reach a consensus, indicating that the extent of trait differences between native and invasives might depend on the environmental context and on the spatial grain of the analysis. Here we evaluate the scale-dependency of native–invader trait comparisons within the Hawaiian Archipelago, a globally important region of high endemicity and high invasibility. We evaluated trait (e.g. gas exchange, leaf nutrient concentration, specific leaf area) differences locally and regionally (i.e. within and across islands) and found that while invasives are more resource acquisitive at the regional scale, native–invader differences are highly idiosyncratic at localized scales, varying both in direction and magnitude within islands. Our findings clarify how region-wide species comparisons may fail to characterize interactions happening at local scales, thereby misleading or obscuring the mechanisms underlying invasion.

Abstract Image

叶片功能性状的尺度依赖性变异阐明了入侵机制
比较共存的本土和入侵植物的功能特征,有助于了解入侵机制。先前的研究未能达成共识,表明本地和入侵物种之间的性状差异程度可能取决于环境背景和分析的空间颗粒。在这里,我们评估了夏威夷群岛(一个全球重要的高地方性和高入侵性地区)本地入侵者特征比较的规模依赖性。我们评估了本地和区域(即岛屿内部和岛屿之间)的性状差异(如气体交换、叶片养分浓度、比叶面积),发现虽然入侵物种在区域尺度上更具资源获取性,但本地入侵物种的差异在局部尺度上具有高度特异性,在岛屿内部的方向和幅度都有所不同。我们的研究结果阐明了区域范围内的物种比较可能无法描述局部尺度上发生的相互作用,从而误导或模糊了入侵的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信