Andrea C. Westerband, Tiffany M. Knight, Kasey E. Barton
{"title":"Scale-dependent variation in leaf functional traits clarifies mechanisms of invasion","authors":"Andrea C. Westerband, Tiffany M. Knight, Kasey E. Barton","doi":"10.1111/ecog.07566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Comparing the functional traits of co-occurring native and invasive plant species can offer insight regarding mechanisms of invasion. Previous studies have failed to reach a consensus, indicating that the extent of trait differences between native and invasives might depend on the environmental context and on the spatial grain of the analysis. Here we evaluate the scale-dependency of native–invader trait comparisons within the Hawaiian Archipelago, a globally important region of high endemicity and high invasibility. We evaluated trait (e.g. gas exchange, leaf nutrient concentration, specific leaf area) differences locally and regionally (i.e. within and across islands) and found that while invasives are more resource acquisitive at the regional scale, native–invader differences are highly idiosyncratic at localized scales, varying both in direction and magnitude within islands. Our findings clarify how region-wide species comparisons may fail to characterize interactions happening at local scales, thereby misleading or obscuring the mechanisms underlying invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"2025 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ecog.07566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ecog.07566","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Comparing the functional traits of co-occurring native and invasive plant species can offer insight regarding mechanisms of invasion. Previous studies have failed to reach a consensus, indicating that the extent of trait differences between native and invasives might depend on the environmental context and on the spatial grain of the analysis. Here we evaluate the scale-dependency of native–invader trait comparisons within the Hawaiian Archipelago, a globally important region of high endemicity and high invasibility. We evaluated trait (e.g. gas exchange, leaf nutrient concentration, specific leaf area) differences locally and regionally (i.e. within and across islands) and found that while invasives are more resource acquisitive at the regional scale, native–invader differences are highly idiosyncratic at localized scales, varying both in direction and magnitude within islands. Our findings clarify how region-wide species comparisons may fail to characterize interactions happening at local scales, thereby misleading or obscuring the mechanisms underlying invasion.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.