Personal Well-Being Index (PWI) and its Association with Physical Health, Mental Health and Leisure Activities: Results from the Health and Lifestyle Survey
Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Yen Sin Koh, Rajeswari Sambasivam, Edimansyah Abdin, Ellaisha Samari, Wai Leng Chow, Stefan Ma, Siow Ann Chong, Mythily Subramaniam
{"title":"Personal Well-Being Index (PWI) and its Association with Physical Health, Mental Health and Leisure Activities: Results from the Health and Lifestyle Survey","authors":"Anitha Jeyagurunathan, Yen Sin Koh, Rajeswari Sambasivam, Edimansyah Abdin, Ellaisha Samari, Wai Leng Chow, Stefan Ma, Siow Ann Chong, Mythily Subramaniam","doi":"10.1007/s10902-025-00889-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study examines subjective well-being among individuals in Singapore, explores the factor structure of the Personal Well-being Index (PWI), and evaluates its association with socio-demographic characteristics, physical and mental health, and leisure activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary data analysis was conducted using a cross-sectional nationwide survey (n = 5872). Subjective well-being was assessed using the PWI scale, while depression and anxiety symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire, respectively. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, chronic physical health conditions, leisure time and lifestyle activities were also obtained. Multivariable linear regression was used for analysis. The mean (SD) PWI score in the general population was 71.34 (± 16.29) which is comparable to the findings in other studies. Higher PWI scores were observed among individuals aged 50–65 years old (vs. 15–34 years), of Indian ethnicity (vs. Chinese), economically inactive/student (vs. employed/self-employed), and those with an income above SGD$2000 (vs. no income/below SGD$2000). Participants who were male (vs. female), single (vs. married) or separated/widowed/divorced (vs. married), and those with one or more chronic physical health conditions (vs. none) were significantly more likely to have lower PWI scores. Participants with higher PWI scores were less likely to have moderate or severe depressive or anxiety symptoms. Individuals who engaged in physical leisure time activities frequently or sometimes had higher PWI scores compared to those who rarely or never did. The study findings support the significant association between physical and leisure time activities and subjective well-being. Our study results highlight the relevance of adapting the PWI instrument in the population setting to enable the implementation of targeted interventions and holistic programmes for the general population. Additionally, the PWI could be a valuable tool for policymakers to understand the personal well-being of population groups, especially in a multiracial community.</p>","PeriodicalId":15837,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Happiness Studies","volume":"148 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Happiness Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-025-00889-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examines subjective well-being among individuals in Singapore, explores the factor structure of the Personal Well-being Index (PWI), and evaluates its association with socio-demographic characteristics, physical and mental health, and leisure activities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Secondary data analysis was conducted using a cross-sectional nationwide survey (n = 5872). Subjective well-being was assessed using the PWI scale, while depression and anxiety symptoms were measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) questionnaire, respectively. Data on socio-demographic characteristics, chronic physical health conditions, leisure time and lifestyle activities were also obtained. Multivariable linear regression was used for analysis. The mean (SD) PWI score in the general population was 71.34 (± 16.29) which is comparable to the findings in other studies. Higher PWI scores were observed among individuals aged 50–65 years old (vs. 15–34 years), of Indian ethnicity (vs. Chinese), economically inactive/student (vs. employed/self-employed), and those with an income above SGD$2000 (vs. no income/below SGD$2000). Participants who were male (vs. female), single (vs. married) or separated/widowed/divorced (vs. married), and those with one or more chronic physical health conditions (vs. none) were significantly more likely to have lower PWI scores. Participants with higher PWI scores were less likely to have moderate or severe depressive or anxiety symptoms. Individuals who engaged in physical leisure time activities frequently or sometimes had higher PWI scores compared to those who rarely or never did. The study findings support the significant association between physical and leisure time activities and subjective well-being. Our study results highlight the relevance of adapting the PWI instrument in the population setting to enable the implementation of targeted interventions and holistic programmes for the general population. Additionally, the PWI could be a valuable tool for policymakers to understand the personal well-being of population groups, especially in a multiracial community.
期刊介绍:
The international peer-reviewed Journal of Happiness Studies is devoted to theoretical and applied advancements in all areas of well-being research. It covers topics referring to both the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives characterizing well-being studies. The former includes the investigation of cognitive dimensions such as satisfaction with life, and positive affect and emotions. The latter includes the study of constructs and processes related to optimal psychological functioning, such as meaning and purpose in life, character strengths, personal growth, resilience, optimism, hope, and self-determination. In addition to contributions on appraisal of life-as-a-whole, the journal accepts papers investigating these topics in relation to specific domains, such as family, education, physical and mental health, and work.
The journal welcomes high-quality theoretical and empirical submissions in the fields of economics, psychology and sociology, as well as contributions from researchers in the domains of education, medicine, philosophy and other related fields.
The Journal of Happiness Studies provides a forum for three main areas in happiness research: 1) theoretical conceptualizations of well-being, happiness and the good life; 2) empirical investigation of well-being and happiness in different populations, contexts and cultures; 3) methodological advancements and development of new assessment instruments.
The journal addresses the conceptualization, operationalization and measurement of happiness and well-being dimensions, as well as the individual, socio-economic and cultural factors that may interact with them as determinants or outcomes.
Central Questions include, but are not limited to:
Conceptualization:
What meanings are denoted by terms like happiness and well-being?
How do these fit in with broader conceptions of the good life?
Operationalization and Measurement:
Which methods can be used to assess how people feel about life?
How to operationalize a new construct or an understudied dimension in the well-being domain?
What are the best measures for investigating specific well-being related constructs and dimensions?
Prevalence and causality
Do individuals belonging to different populations and cultures vary in their well-being ratings?
How does individual well-being relate to social and economic phenomena (characteristics, circumstances, behavior, events, and policies)?
What are the personal, social and economic determinants and causes of individual well-being dimensions?
Evaluation:
What are the consequences of well-being for individual development and socio-economic progress?
Are individual happiness and well-being worthwhile goals for governments and policy makers?
Does well-being represent a useful parameter to orient planning in physical and mental healthcare, and in public health?
Interdisciplinary studies:
How has the study of happiness developed within and across disciplines?
Can we link philosophical thought and empirical research?
What are the biological correlates of well-being dimensions?