David Righton, Pieterjan Verhelst, Håkan Westerberg
{"title":"The Blueprint of the European Eel Life Cycle: Does Life‐History Strategy Undermine or Provide Hope for Population Recovery?","authors":"David Righton, Pieterjan Verhelst, Håkan Westerberg","doi":"10.1111/faf.12894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The life cycle of the European eel (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>Anguilla anguilla</jats:italic></jats:styled-content>) is inherently risky because it relies on the successful migration of larvae and adults across thousands of kilometres of the Atlantic Ocean. In between these migrations, eels need to grow and develop to maximise their potential for successful reproduction. Eels have a number of life‐history characteristics at each life stage that minimise mortality, starvation and predation risks and maximise opportunities for growth. In the larval and silver eel phases, eels select specific habitats and adopt efficient swimming behaviours to minimise predation and migration failure risks. In the glass and yellow eel phase, the opposite is the case, and plasticity and adaptability enable occupation of a broad ecological niche that maximises growth opportunities and enables a continent‐wide distribution. Under natural conditions, these characteristics enable enough individuals to survive, grow and reproduce so that the population is resilient to natural risks. However, there is increasing evidence of impacts of anthropogenic activities that eels may be particularly sensitive to, resulting in a declining population with reduced resilience. Climate‐linked oceanic risk factors are likely to have a significant influence on the recruitment of eels but are not well understood and cannot be easily modified. However, interventions to mitigate known impacts in the growth environment offer hope for population recovery. A greater understanding of the plasticity of the growth phase and the impacts of risks during the oceanic phase is essential to enable management interventions in the Anthropocene to be fully effective.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"401 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12894","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The life cycle of the European eel (Anguilla anguilla) is inherently risky because it relies on the successful migration of larvae and adults across thousands of kilometres of the Atlantic Ocean. In between these migrations, eels need to grow and develop to maximise their potential for successful reproduction. Eels have a number of life‐history characteristics at each life stage that minimise mortality, starvation and predation risks and maximise opportunities for growth. In the larval and silver eel phases, eels select specific habitats and adopt efficient swimming behaviours to minimise predation and migration failure risks. In the glass and yellow eel phase, the opposite is the case, and plasticity and adaptability enable occupation of a broad ecological niche that maximises growth opportunities and enables a continent‐wide distribution. Under natural conditions, these characteristics enable enough individuals to survive, grow and reproduce so that the population is resilient to natural risks. However, there is increasing evidence of impacts of anthropogenic activities that eels may be particularly sensitive to, resulting in a declining population with reduced resilience. Climate‐linked oceanic risk factors are likely to have a significant influence on the recruitment of eels but are not well understood and cannot be easily modified. However, interventions to mitigate known impacts in the growth environment offer hope for population recovery. A greater understanding of the plasticity of the growth phase and the impacts of risks during the oceanic phase is essential to enable management interventions in the Anthropocene to be fully effective.
期刊介绍:
Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.