The multiple drivers of thermal disparities in US manufactured housing

IF 4.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
C J Gabbe, Gregory Pierce, Matthew J Barnett, Sara Hughes
{"title":"The multiple drivers of thermal disparities in US manufactured housing","authors":"C J Gabbe, Gregory Pierce, Matthew J Barnett, Sara Hughes","doi":"10.1177/00420980251320852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Extreme heat kills more Americans than any other weather hazard. Residents of manufactured housing – in both urban and rural settings – are more likely than those in other housing types to need medical attention due to heat exposure at home. This study thus examines the drivers of residential thermal disparities for manufactured housing residents across the US. We use data from the 2020 Residential Energy Consumption Survey and 2021 American Housing Survey to more holistically assess thermal disparities for manufactured housing residents than previous studies. We do this by examining four potential drivers of thermal disparities: air conditioning (AC) access, AC functional use, cooling costs and underlying physical housing deficiencies that hinder cooling. Through a combination of descriptive statistics and multivariate regression modelling, we identify a connected but ranging set of drivers. First, manufactured housing residents have less central AC access and a much higher likelihood of AC equipment breakdowns. Around 10% of manufactured housing AC units break down in a given year, more than twice the frequency in other housing types. Second, while results are mixed regarding differences in cooling costs per square foot, households in manufactured housing experience the highest cooling costs as a share of their annual income of all major housing types. Lastly, manufactured housing has a greater combination of inadequate insulation and other physical deficiencies than other housing types. We discuss the implications of these concerning findings for policy and future research.","PeriodicalId":51350,"journal":{"name":"Urban Studies","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980251320852","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extreme heat kills more Americans than any other weather hazard. Residents of manufactured housing – in both urban and rural settings – are more likely than those in other housing types to need medical attention due to heat exposure at home. This study thus examines the drivers of residential thermal disparities for manufactured housing residents across the US. We use data from the 2020 Residential Energy Consumption Survey and 2021 American Housing Survey to more holistically assess thermal disparities for manufactured housing residents than previous studies. We do this by examining four potential drivers of thermal disparities: air conditioning (AC) access, AC functional use, cooling costs and underlying physical housing deficiencies that hinder cooling. Through a combination of descriptive statistics and multivariate regression modelling, we identify a connected but ranging set of drivers. First, manufactured housing residents have less central AC access and a much higher likelihood of AC equipment breakdowns. Around 10% of manufactured housing AC units break down in a given year, more than twice the frequency in other housing types. Second, while results are mixed regarding differences in cooling costs per square foot, households in manufactured housing experience the highest cooling costs as a share of their annual income of all major housing types. Lastly, manufactured housing has a greater combination of inadequate insulation and other physical deficiencies than other housing types. We discuss the implications of these concerning findings for policy and future research.
美国制造住房热差异的多重驱动因素
极端高温造成的死亡人数超过了其他任何天气灾害。居住在人造住房中的居民——无论在城市还是农村——都比居住在其他类型住房中的居民更有可能因在家中受热而需要就医。因此,本研究考察了美国制造住房居民住宅热差异的驱动因素。我们使用2020年住宅能源消耗调查和2021年美国住房调查的数据,比以前的研究更全面地评估制造住房居民的热差异。为此,我们研究了四个潜在的热差异驱动因素:空调接入、空调功能使用、冷却成本和阻碍冷却的潜在物理住房缺陷。通过描述性统计和多元回归模型的结合,我们确定了一组相互关联但范围广泛的驱动因素。首先,制造住房的居民很少有中央交流通道,交流设备故障的可能性要高得多。在一年中,大约有10%的人造住宅空调发生故障,是其他住宅类型的两倍多。其次,虽然每平方英尺制冷成本的差异结果不一,但在所有主要住房类型中,居住在人造住房中的家庭的制冷成本占年收入的比例最高。最后,与其他类型的房屋相比,制造的房屋有更大的绝缘不足和其他物理缺陷的组合。我们将讨论这些有关研究结果对政策和未来研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urban Studies
Urban Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
10.50
自引率
8.50%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Urban Studies was first published in 1964 to provide an international forum of social and economic contributions to the fields of urban and regional planning. Since then, the Journal has expanded to encompass the increasing range of disciplines and approaches that have been brought to bear on urban and regional problems. Contents include original articles, notes and comments, and a comprehensive book review section. Regular contributions are drawn from the fields of economics, planning, political science, statistics, geography, sociology, population studies and public administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信