Extended endocrine therapy use and decision making after breast cancer diagnosis

Allison W Kurian, Allison K C Furgal, Archana Radhakrishnan, Christine M Veenstra, Paul Abrahamse, Kevin C Ward, Ann S Hamilton, Timothy P Hofer, Steven J Katz, Lauren P Wallner, Sarah T Hawley
{"title":"Extended endocrine therapy use and decision making after breast cancer diagnosis","authors":"Allison W Kurian, Allison K C Furgal, Archana Radhakrishnan, Christine M Veenstra, Paul Abrahamse, Kevin C Ward, Ann S Hamilton, Timothy P Hofer, Steven J Katz, Lauren P Wallner, Sarah T Hawley","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djaf076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Adjuvant endocrine therapy is recommended to extend beyond five years for stage II breast cancer, with less consensus for extension in stage I. We aimed to understand use of and decision-making about extended endocrine therapy. Patients and Methods Women aged 20-79 diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer in 2014-15 and reported to Georgia and Los Angeles County SEER registries were surveyed at seven months and again at six years post-diagnosis (N = 2,361; response rate = 60%). Women with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive disease were asked about their decision whether to continue therapy. Results Of 831 women, 591 had completed or were completing five years of endocrine therapy. Among those who had decided (n = 557), 46.9% decided to continue (39.4% stage I, 62.4% stage II). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with continuation for stage I were worry about recurrence (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-6.32); desire for most extensive treatment (aOR 2.15; CI 1.11-4.14); and primary care physician participation (aOR 4.30; CI 2.22-8.32). Side effects were inversely associated with continuation (stage I aOR 0.21: CI 0.11-0.41). Associations were similar for stage II; for stage I only, bilateral mastectomy and chemotherapy were associated with continuation. Decision to continue did not vary by race, ethnicity or demographic factors. Conclusions Nearly 40% of women with stage I breast cancer, and two-thirds with stage II, decided to extend endocrine therapy. Decision-making was influenced by patient values and varied little by stage. These results can inform physician-patient discussion about extending endocrine therapy.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djaf076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Adjuvant endocrine therapy is recommended to extend beyond five years for stage II breast cancer, with less consensus for extension in stage I. We aimed to understand use of and decision-making about extended endocrine therapy. Patients and Methods Women aged 20-79 diagnosed with stage I-II breast cancer in 2014-15 and reported to Georgia and Los Angeles County SEER registries were surveyed at seven months and again at six years post-diagnosis (N = 2,361; response rate = 60%). Women with estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR)-positive disease were asked about their decision whether to continue therapy. Results Of 831 women, 591 had completed or were completing five years of endocrine therapy. Among those who had decided (n = 557), 46.9% decided to continue (39.4% stage I, 62.4% stage II). On multivariable analysis, factors associated with continuation for stage I were worry about recurrence (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 3.35, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.78-6.32); desire for most extensive treatment (aOR 2.15; CI 1.11-4.14); and primary care physician participation (aOR 4.30; CI 2.22-8.32). Side effects were inversely associated with continuation (stage I aOR 0.21: CI 0.11-0.41). Associations were similar for stage II; for stage I only, bilateral mastectomy and chemotherapy were associated with continuation. Decision to continue did not vary by race, ethnicity or demographic factors. Conclusions Nearly 40% of women with stage I breast cancer, and two-thirds with stage II, decided to extend endocrine therapy. Decision-making was influenced by patient values and varied little by stage. These results can inform physician-patient discussion about extending endocrine therapy.
乳腺癌诊断后延长内分泌治疗的使用和决策
目的辅助内分泌治疗建议延长至5年以上的II期乳腺癌,但在i期延长的共识较少。我们旨在了解延长内分泌治疗的使用和决策。患者和方法在2014- 2015年期间诊断为I-II期乳腺癌并在乔治亚州和洛杉矶县SEER登记处报告的20-79岁妇女在诊断后7个月和6年再次接受调查(N = 2361;应答率= 60%)。患有雌激素受体(ER)和/或孕激素受体(PR)阳性疾病的妇女被问及是否决定继续治疗。结果在831名妇女中,591名已完成或正在完成5年的内分泌治疗。在决定继续治疗的患者中(n = 557), 46.9%的患者决定继续治疗(39.4%为一期,62.4%为二期)。在多变量分析中,与继续治疗一期相关的因素是担心复发(调整优势比(aOR) 3.35, 95%可信区间(CI) 1.78-6.32);最广泛治疗的愿望(aOR 2.15;可信区间1.11 - -4.14);和初级保健医生参与(aOR 4.30;可信区间2.22 - -8.32)。副作用与继续治疗呈负相关(I期aOR 0.21: CI 0.11-0.41)。II期的关联相似;仅在I期,双侧乳房切除术和化疗与延续有关。继续的决定没有因种族、民族或人口因素而异。近40%的I期乳腺癌患者和三分之二的II期乳腺癌患者决定延长内分泌治疗。决策受患者价值观的影响,各阶段变化不大。这些结果可以为扩大内分泌治疗的医患讨论提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信