{"title":"Reply to: Re-examining magnetic tuning of Casimir forces","authors":"Yichi Zhang, Hui Zhang, Xiuxia Wang, Yiheng Wang, Tianyi Ruan, Yuchen Liu, Shu Li, Tianyi Zhang, Chuang Fan, Changgan Zeng","doi":"10.1038/s41567-025-02846-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><span>replying to</span> M. Moazzami Gudarzi and S. H. Aboutalebi <i>Nature Physics</i> https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02845-5 (2025)</p><p>In their Matters Arising, Moazzami Gudarzi and Aboutalebi<sup>1</sup> first highlight the inaccurate dielectric functions of water and Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> used in our Lifshitz theory calculations<sup>1</sup>. Upon careful re-examination, we discovered that our representation of <span>\\(\\varepsilon_{{{{\\rm{Fe}}_{3}}}{{\\rm{O}}}_{4}}(i\\xi)\\)</span> (where <span>\\(\\varepsilon_{{{{\\rm{Fe}}_{3}}}{{\\rm{O}}}_{4}}\\)</span> is the dielectric permittivity of Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub>, <i>i</i> is the imaginary unit and <i>ξ</i> is the Matsubara frequency) was based on a mistyped equation (equation (9)) from ref. <sup>2</sup>:</p><span>$${I}_{3}\\left(\\xi\\,\\right)=\\frac{C{\\varOmega }_{2}^{2}}{{\\xi }^{\\,2}}\\left[1+\\frac{{\\varOmega }_{2}}{\\xi }\\arctan \\frac{{\\varOmega }_{2}}{\\xi }-\\frac{\\uppi }{2}\\right],$$</span><p>where <i>I</i><sub>3</sub> is a part of Kramers–Kronig relation, <i>C</i> = 1.58 and Ω<sub>2</sub> = 1.8 × 10<sup>6</sup> rad/s. The correct equation should read:</p><span>$${I}_{3}\\left(\\xi\\,\\right)=\\frac{C{\\varOmega }_{2}^{2}}{{\\xi }^{2}}\\left[1+\\frac{{\\varOmega }_{2}}{\\xi }\\arctan \\frac{{\\varOmega }_{2}}{\\xi }-\\frac{{{{\\uppi }}\\varOmega }_{2}}{2\\xi }\\right].$$</span>","PeriodicalId":19100,"journal":{"name":"Nature Physics","volume":"183 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02846-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
replying to M. Moazzami Gudarzi and S. H. Aboutalebi Nature Physics https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-025-02845-5 (2025)
In their Matters Arising, Moazzami Gudarzi and Aboutalebi1 first highlight the inaccurate dielectric functions of water and Fe3O4 used in our Lifshitz theory calculations1. Upon careful re-examination, we discovered that our representation of \(\varepsilon_{{{{\rm{Fe}}_{3}}}{{\rm{O}}}_{4}}(i\xi)\) (where \(\varepsilon_{{{{\rm{Fe}}_{3}}}{{\rm{O}}}_{4}}\) is the dielectric permittivity of Fe3O4, i is the imaginary unit and ξ is the Matsubara frequency) was based on a mistyped equation (equation (9)) from ref. 2:
期刊介绍:
Nature Physics is dedicated to publishing top-tier original research in physics with a fair and rigorous review process. It provides high visibility and access to a broad readership, maintaining high standards in copy editing and production, ensuring rapid publication, and maintaining independence from academic societies and other vested interests.
The journal presents two main research paper formats: Letters and Articles. Alongside primary research, Nature Physics serves as a central source for valuable information within the physics community through Review Articles, News & Views, Research Highlights covering crucial developments across the physics literature, Commentaries, Book Reviews, and Correspondence.