Improving radiotherapy precision through MLC model optimization for a Monaco treatment planning system

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Nguyen Khac Son, Ngo Hoang Long, Ha Anh Tu, Bao Lam, Duong Thanh Tai, Nissren Tamam, Abdelmoneim Sulieman, Peter Sandwall, James C.L. Chow
{"title":"Improving radiotherapy precision through MLC model optimization for a Monaco treatment planning system","authors":"Nguyen Khac Son, Ngo Hoang Long, Ha Anh Tu, Bao Lam, Duong Thanh Tai, Nissren Tamam, Abdelmoneim Sulieman, Peter Sandwall, James C.L. Chow","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study optimizes the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) model in the Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS), seeking to enhance dose calculation accuracy in radiotherapy. The focus is on refining key parameters such as leaf transmission, leaf groove width, and leaf offset to improve the alignment between calculated and measured dose distributions. The optimization process was conducted at Lam Dong General Hospital using the Elekta MLCi2 system. Iterative adjustments were made to the MLC parameters by analyzing the dose profiles of various test fields, such as FOURL, 3ABUT, and 7SEGA configurations. These profiles were used to detect discrepancies between calculated and measured doses, guiding the adjustments. After each adjustment, gamma analysis was applied to assess whether the refinements improved the quality of dose distribution. The refined MLC model was further validated using complex fields like DMLC, HIMRT, and HDMLC, and applied to clinical treatment plans to evaluate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Significant improvements in dose conformity and precision were observed. For instance, optimization of leaf transmission reduced the difference between measured and calculated doses, improving from −2.238 cGy to 0.037 cGy. Adjustments to leaf groove width and leaf offset similarly enhanced dose accuracy. Validation results showed notable improvements in gamma pass rates, particularly for the stringent 1 %/1 mm criterion. The optimized model also demonstrated substantial improvements in gamma pass rates across various clinical scenarios, including rectum, prostate, esophageal, head-neck, breast, and lung cases. Optimization of the MLC model within the Monaco TPS has proven to be a valuable approach in enhancing dose calculation accuracy. The study highlights the importance of continuous quality assurance and fine-tuning of MLC parameters to maintain high standards of treatment accuracy, ultimately contributing to better clinical outcomes for patients.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.112730","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study optimizes the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) model in the Monaco Treatment Planning System (TPS), seeking to enhance dose calculation accuracy in radiotherapy. The focus is on refining key parameters such as leaf transmission, leaf groove width, and leaf offset to improve the alignment between calculated and measured dose distributions. The optimization process was conducted at Lam Dong General Hospital using the Elekta MLCi2 system. Iterative adjustments were made to the MLC parameters by analyzing the dose profiles of various test fields, such as FOURL, 3ABUT, and 7SEGA configurations. These profiles were used to detect discrepancies between calculated and measured doses, guiding the adjustments. After each adjustment, gamma analysis was applied to assess whether the refinements improved the quality of dose distribution. The refined MLC model was further validated using complex fields like DMLC, HIMRT, and HDMLC, and applied to clinical treatment plans to evaluate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Significant improvements in dose conformity and precision were observed. For instance, optimization of leaf transmission reduced the difference between measured and calculated doses, improving from −2.238 cGy to 0.037 cGy. Adjustments to leaf groove width and leaf offset similarly enhanced dose accuracy. Validation results showed notable improvements in gamma pass rates, particularly for the stringent 1 %/1 mm criterion. The optimized model also demonstrated substantial improvements in gamma pass rates across various clinical scenarios, including rectum, prostate, esophageal, head-neck, breast, and lung cases. Optimization of the MLC model within the Monaco TPS has proven to be a valuable approach in enhancing dose calculation accuracy. The study highlights the importance of continuous quality assurance and fine-tuning of MLC parameters to maintain high standards of treatment accuracy, ultimately contributing to better clinical outcomes for patients.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信