Combating Burnout Amongst Residents Through Fostering Resilience: A Systematic Review.

Le Xuan Shannon Tan, Jiayan Ding, Timothy Xuxian Neo, Vincent Sixian Chen, Charmaine Shi Mei Lee, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Yun Ting Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna
{"title":"Combating Burnout Amongst Residents Through Fostering Resilience: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Le Xuan Shannon Tan, Jiayan Ding, Timothy Xuxian Neo, Vincent Sixian Chen, Charmaine Shi Mei Lee, Nur Amira Binte Abdul Hamid, Yun Ting Ong, Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna","doi":"10.1177/10499091251331150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundBurnout, marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and depletion of professional efficacy, is rampant among residents. With deleterious effects on productivity, conduct and patient care, resident programs have increasingly emphasized resilience training to combat burnout. However, the personalized nature of burnout complicates the effective design of such programs. Premised on recent works that identify burnout as a result of shifting personhood, this study utilizes the Ring Theory of Personhood to guide the conceptualization of resilience training programs that address changes in the belief systems shaping one's self-concept.MethodsA systematic scoping review to explore how resilience is addressed and assessed amongst medical residents was conducted. Guided by the PRISMA-compliant Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA), searches for relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 4th November 2024 on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC and PsycINFO were performed. The SEBA methodology facilitated the integration of the themes and categories identified using thematic and content analyses.ResultsOf 15 953 abstracts screened, 666 articles were reviewed and 69 full-text articles were included. Three domains were identified: guiding theories; methods of teaching resilience; and assessment.ConclusionThe reliance on individual or societal theories has constrained the understanding, design and assessment of resilience programs. Current approaches, including mindfulness workshops, self-care initiatives and organization-led resilience training, are neither timely nor focused on the needs of each resident. To mitigate burnout, personalized, longitudinal and timely support is essential. Mentoring offers a more suitable alternative, providing culturally sensitive, resource-appropriate, sustainable and clinically relevant support to build resilience effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"10499091251331150"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091251331150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundBurnout, marked by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization and depletion of professional efficacy, is rampant among residents. With deleterious effects on productivity, conduct and patient care, resident programs have increasingly emphasized resilience training to combat burnout. However, the personalized nature of burnout complicates the effective design of such programs. Premised on recent works that identify burnout as a result of shifting personhood, this study utilizes the Ring Theory of Personhood to guide the conceptualization of resilience training programs that address changes in the belief systems shaping one's self-concept.MethodsA systematic scoping review to explore how resilience is addressed and assessed amongst medical residents was conducted. Guided by the PRISMA-compliant Systematic Evidence-Based Approach (SEBA), searches for relevant articles published between 1st January 2000 and 4th November 2024 on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC and PsycINFO were performed. The SEBA methodology facilitated the integration of the themes and categories identified using thematic and content analyses.ResultsOf 15 953 abstracts screened, 666 articles were reviewed and 69 full-text articles were included. Three domains were identified: guiding theories; methods of teaching resilience; and assessment.ConclusionThe reliance on individual or societal theories has constrained the understanding, design and assessment of resilience programs. Current approaches, including mindfulness workshops, self-care initiatives and organization-led resilience training, are neither timely nor focused on the needs of each resident. To mitigate burnout, personalized, longitudinal and timely support is essential. Mentoring offers a more suitable alternative, providing culturally sensitive, resource-appropriate, sustainable and clinically relevant support to build resilience effectively.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信