Does facial sunscreen usage impact radiographic image quality and radiation dose? An in vitro study.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yuri Nejaim, Gabriela Sofia Noé Bregolin, Natália Hitomi Suekane, Estéfany Figueiredo Gonzalez, Fernando Roberto Ferreira Valente, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele
{"title":"Does facial sunscreen usage impact radiographic image quality and radiation dose? An in vitro study.","authors":"Yuri Nejaim, Gabriela Sofia Noé Bregolin, Natália Hitomi Suekane, Estéfany Figueiredo Gonzalez, Fernando Roberto Ferreira Valente, Rocharles Cavalcante Fontenele","doi":"10.1007/s11282-025-00819-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess whether the use of different types of facial sunscreen influences the quality of radiographic images and the absorbed radiation dose during radiographic acquisitions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this in vitro study, two types of facial sunscreens (Bioderma<sup>®</sup>), both with a sun protection factor of 50, were tested: one organic and one inorganic. A polystyrene plate was used, containing a thermoluminescent dosimeter and a photostimulable phosphor plate for the radiographs. The sunscreen was applied to the plate, and five radiographs were taken for each group: control (without sunscreen), organic sunscreen, and inorganic sunscreen. Image quality was assessed by noise, brightness, and uniformity, and the radiation dose was measured in milligrays. The results were compared using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc test (α = 5%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inorganic sunscreen produced images with higher brightness and lower uniformity, with no significant differences in noise. Additionally, this group showed a lower radiation dose (0.50 mGy) compared to the control group (0.60 mGy) and the organic sunscreen (0.58 mGy) (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The inorganic sunscreen altered image quality by increasing brightness and decreasing uniformity, while also reducing the absorbed radiation dose.</p>","PeriodicalId":56103,"journal":{"name":"Oral Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11282-025-00819-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether the use of different types of facial sunscreen influences the quality of radiographic images and the absorbed radiation dose during radiographic acquisitions.

Methods: In this in vitro study, two types of facial sunscreens (Bioderma®), both with a sun protection factor of 50, were tested: one organic and one inorganic. A polystyrene plate was used, containing a thermoluminescent dosimeter and a photostimulable phosphor plate for the radiographs. The sunscreen was applied to the plate, and five radiographs were taken for each group: control (without sunscreen), organic sunscreen, and inorganic sunscreen. Image quality was assessed by noise, brightness, and uniformity, and the radiation dose was measured in milligrays. The results were compared using one-way analysis of variance with Tukey post-hoc test (α = 5%).

Results: Inorganic sunscreen produced images with higher brightness and lower uniformity, with no significant differences in noise. Additionally, this group showed a lower radiation dose (0.50 mGy) compared to the control group (0.60 mGy) and the organic sunscreen (0.58 mGy) (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: The inorganic sunscreen altered image quality by increasing brightness and decreasing uniformity, while also reducing the absorbed radiation dose.

面部防晒霜的使用是否会影响放射图像质量和辐射剂量?一项体外研究。
目的:探讨使用不同类型的面部防晒霜对x线图像质量和x线成像吸收剂量的影响。方法:在这项体外研究中,测试了两种类型的面部防晒霜(Bioderma®),防晒系数均为50:一种是有机的,一种是无机的。使用聚苯乙烯板,其中包含热释光剂量计和用于x光片的光刺激荧光粉板。将防晒霜涂在平板上,每组拍摄5张x光片:对照组(不涂防晒霜)、有机防晒霜和无机防晒霜。图像质量通过噪声、亮度和均匀性来评估,辐射剂量以毫克为单位测量。采用单因素方差分析和Tukey事后检验(α = 5%)对结果进行比较。结果:无机防晒霜产生的图像亮度较高,均匀性较低,噪声无显著差异。此外,与对照组(0.60 mGy)和有机防晒霜(0.58 mGy)相比,无机防晒霜显示出较低的辐射剂量(0.50 mGy)。(p)结论:无机防晒霜通过增加亮度和降低均匀性来改变图像质量,同时也降低了吸收的辐射剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oral Radiology
Oral Radiology DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official English-language journal of the Japanese Society for Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology and the Asian Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Oral Radiology is intended to be a forum for international collaboration in head and neck diagnostic imaging and all related fields. Oral Radiology features cutting-edge research papers, review articles, case reports, and technical notes from both the clinical and experimental fields. As membership in the Society is not a prerequisite, contributions are welcome from researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信