Paolo Bossi , Salvatore Alfieri , Pierluigi Bonomo , Andrea Botticelli , Francesca De Felice , Maria Grazia Ghi , Massimo Ghiani , Gabriele Molteni , Patrizia Morbini , Francesco Perri , Vittorio Rampinelli , Marco Ravanelli , Valentino Valentini , Stefania Vecchio , Laura Deborah Locati
{"title":"Improving the multidisciplinary therapeutic management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Consensus statements from an Italian expert panel","authors":"Paolo Bossi , Salvatore Alfieri , Pierluigi Bonomo , Andrea Botticelli , Francesca De Felice , Maria Grazia Ghi , Massimo Ghiani , Gabriele Molteni , Patrizia Morbini , Francesco Perri , Vittorio Rampinelli , Marco Ravanelli , Valentino Valentini , Stefania Vecchio , Laura Deborah Locati","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The management of recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant clinical challenges. This study aimed to develop expert consensus statements to improve the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team of 39 Italian experts, including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus on critical aspects of RM HNSCC management. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, focusing on five key areas: PD-L1 testing, treatment selection, treatment refinement, patient care, and special clinical scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached on 43 out of 45 statements (96 %). Key recommendations included mandatory PD-L1 testing for guiding treatment selection, the use of immunotherapy in patients with a combined positive score ≥ 1, and the importance of considering patient fitness, disease characteristics, and potential treatment toxicities in decision-making. The panel emphasized integrating supportive care early in the treatment pathway and highlighted the need for multidisciplinary decision-making in cases of oligometastatic disease. Treatment strategies should prioritize both locoregional control and systemic therapy based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These consensus statements provide guidance for optimizing the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC, emphasizing personalized treatment strategies, early supportive care, and the importance of clinical trials to address existing uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 104709"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825000976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
The management of recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant clinical challenges. This study aimed to develop expert consensus statements to improve the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC.
Methods
A multidisciplinary team of 39 Italian experts, including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus on critical aspects of RM HNSCC management. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, focusing on five key areas: PD-L1 testing, treatment selection, treatment refinement, patient care, and special clinical scenarios.
Results
Consensus was reached on 43 out of 45 statements (96 %). Key recommendations included mandatory PD-L1 testing for guiding treatment selection, the use of immunotherapy in patients with a combined positive score ≥ 1, and the importance of considering patient fitness, disease characteristics, and potential treatment toxicities in decision-making. The panel emphasized integrating supportive care early in the treatment pathway and highlighted the need for multidisciplinary decision-making in cases of oligometastatic disease. Treatment strategies should prioritize both locoregional control and systemic therapy based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors.
Conclusions
These consensus statements provide guidance for optimizing the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC, emphasizing personalized treatment strategies, early supportive care, and the importance of clinical trials to address existing uncertainties.
期刊介绍:
Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.