Improving the multidisciplinary therapeutic management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Consensus statements from an Italian expert panel

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Paolo Bossi , Salvatore Alfieri , Pierluigi Bonomo , Andrea Botticelli , Francesca De Felice , Maria Grazia Ghi , Massimo Ghiani , Gabriele Molteni , Patrizia Morbini , Francesco Perri , Vittorio Rampinelli , Marco Ravanelli , Valentino Valentini , Stefania Vecchio , Laura Deborah Locati
{"title":"Improving the multidisciplinary therapeutic management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: Consensus statements from an Italian expert panel","authors":"Paolo Bossi ,&nbsp;Salvatore Alfieri ,&nbsp;Pierluigi Bonomo ,&nbsp;Andrea Botticelli ,&nbsp;Francesca De Felice ,&nbsp;Maria Grazia Ghi ,&nbsp;Massimo Ghiani ,&nbsp;Gabriele Molteni ,&nbsp;Patrizia Morbini ,&nbsp;Francesco Perri ,&nbsp;Vittorio Rampinelli ,&nbsp;Marco Ravanelli ,&nbsp;Valentino Valentini ,&nbsp;Stefania Vecchio ,&nbsp;Laura Deborah Locati","doi":"10.1016/j.critrevonc.2025.104709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The management of recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant clinical challenges. This study aimed to develop expert consensus statements to improve the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multidisciplinary team of 39 Italian experts, including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus on critical aspects of RM HNSCC management. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, focusing on five key areas: PD-L1 testing, treatment selection, treatment refinement, patient care, and special clinical scenarios.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Consensus was reached on 43 out of 45 statements (96 %). Key recommendations included mandatory PD-L1 testing for guiding treatment selection, the use of immunotherapy in patients with a combined positive score ≥ 1, and the importance of considering patient fitness, disease characteristics, and potential treatment toxicities in decision-making. The panel emphasized integrating supportive care early in the treatment pathway and highlighted the need for multidisciplinary decision-making in cases of oligometastatic disease. Treatment strategies should prioritize both locoregional control and systemic therapy based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>These consensus statements provide guidance for optimizing the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC, emphasizing personalized treatment strategies, early supportive care, and the importance of clinical trials to address existing uncertainties.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11358,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","volume":"210 ","pages":"Article 104709"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oncology/hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040842825000976","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The management of recurrent and/or metastatic (RM) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) poses significant clinical challenges. This study aimed to develop expert consensus statements to improve the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team of 39 Italian experts, including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, radiologists, and pathologists, employed the Delphi method to achieve consensus on critical aspects of RM HNSCC management. Two rounds of surveys were conducted, focusing on five key areas: PD-L1 testing, treatment selection, treatment refinement, patient care, and special clinical scenarios.

Results

Consensus was reached on 43 out of 45 statements (96 %). Key recommendations included mandatory PD-L1 testing for guiding treatment selection, the use of immunotherapy in patients with a combined positive score ≥ 1, and the importance of considering patient fitness, disease characteristics, and potential treatment toxicities in decision-making. The panel emphasized integrating supportive care early in the treatment pathway and highlighted the need for multidisciplinary decision-making in cases of oligometastatic disease. Treatment strategies should prioritize both locoregional control and systemic therapy based on tumor biology and patient-specific factors.

Conclusions

These consensus statements provide guidance for optimizing the multidisciplinary management of RM HNSCC, emphasizing personalized treatment strategies, early supportive care, and the importance of clinical trials to address existing uncertainties.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
213
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology publishes scholarly, critical reviews in all fields of oncology and hematology written by experts from around the world. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology is the Official Journal of the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the International Society of Liquid Biopsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信