Spectral and Microstate EEG Analysis in Narcolepsy Type 1 and Type 2 Across Sleep Stages.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shengpeng Liang, Yihong Cheng, Shixu Du, Dhirendra Paudel, Yan Xu, Bin Zhang
{"title":"Spectral and Microstate EEG Analysis in Narcolepsy Type 1 and Type 2 Across Sleep Stages.","authors":"Shengpeng Liang, Yihong Cheng, Shixu Du, Dhirendra Paudel, Yan Xu, Bin Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10548-025-01114-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The primary distinction between narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is the presence or absence of cataplexy, which is commonly determined through clinical interviews, though it can be prone to error due to vague patients descriptions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate EEG microstate differences between NT1 and NT2 and their correlation with clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Polysomnography (PSG) and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) were performed on 14 NT1 and 13 NT2 patients from three hospitals, with data from the ISRUC-SLEEP dataset serving as the comparison group. After EEG preprocessing, we performed the spectral analysis in NT1 and NT2, followed by microstate analysis. Grand mean maps were used for backfitting to obtain microstate parameters. Then, Spearman correlation was performed between the microstate parameters and the ESS and MSLT parameters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that the relative delta power in N2 was lower in the NT1 group compared to the NT2 group. Four microstates were clustered in all groups, and no statistical differences were observed in the microstate parameters between NT1 and NT2 groups. In the NT1 group, microstate D during wakefulness showed a positive correlation with ESS, while in the NT2 group, microstate D during wakefulness showed a negative correlation with ESS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are spectral differences between the NT1 and NT2 groups, and the opposite correlation between microstate D and ESS during wakefulness in NT1 and NT2 suggest that the underlying mechanisms leading to excessive daytime sleepiness in the two groups may be different.</p>","PeriodicalId":55329,"journal":{"name":"Brain Topography","volume":"38 3","pages":"40"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Topography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-025-01114-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The primary distinction between narcolepsy type 1 (NT1) and narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is the presence or absence of cataplexy, which is commonly determined through clinical interviews, though it can be prone to error due to vague patients descriptions.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate EEG microstate differences between NT1 and NT2 and their correlation with clinical assessments.

Methods: Polysomnography (PSG) and the Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) were performed on 14 NT1 and 13 NT2 patients from three hospitals, with data from the ISRUC-SLEEP dataset serving as the comparison group. After EEG preprocessing, we performed the spectral analysis in NT1 and NT2, followed by microstate analysis. Grand mean maps were used for backfitting to obtain microstate parameters. Then, Spearman correlation was performed between the microstate parameters and the ESS and MSLT parameters.

Results: We found that the relative delta power in N2 was lower in the NT1 group compared to the NT2 group. Four microstates were clustered in all groups, and no statistical differences were observed in the microstate parameters between NT1 and NT2 groups. In the NT1 group, microstate D during wakefulness showed a positive correlation with ESS, while in the NT2 group, microstate D during wakefulness showed a negative correlation with ESS.

Conclusions: There are spectral differences between the NT1 and NT2 groups, and the opposite correlation between microstate D and ESS during wakefulness in NT1 and NT2 suggest that the underlying mechanisms leading to excessive daytime sleepiness in the two groups may be different.

1型和2型发作性睡病跨睡眠阶段的频谱和微状态脑电图分析。
背景:1型嗜睡症(NT1)和2型嗜睡症(NT2)的主要区别在于有无惊厥,这通常通过临床访谈来确定,但由于患者的描述模糊不清,很容易出现误差:本研究旨在调查 NT1 和 NT2 的脑电图微状态差异及其与临床评估的相关性:方法:对来自三家医院的 14 名 NT1 和 13 名 NT2 患者进行多导睡眠图(PSG)和多重睡眠潜伏期测试(MSLT),并以 ISRUC-SLEEP 数据集的数据作为对比组。经过脑电图预处理后,我们对 NT1 和 NT2 进行了频谱分析,然后进行了微状态分析。使用大均值图进行反拟合,以获得微状态参数。然后,在微状态参数与 ESS 和 MSLT 参数之间进行斯皮尔曼相关性分析:结果:我们发现,与 NT2 组相比,NT1 组 N2 的相对 delta 功率较低。所有组中都有四个微态,NT1 组和 NT2 组之间的微态参数没有统计学差异。在NT1组中,清醒时的微态D与ESS呈正相关,而在NT2组中,清醒时的微态D与ESS呈负相关:NT1组和NT2组之间存在频谱差异,NT1组和NT2组清醒时的微状态D与ESS的相关性相反,这表明导致两组人白天过度嗜睡的潜在机制可能不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain Topography
Brain Topography 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Brain Topography publishes clinical and basic research on cognitive neuroscience and functional neurophysiology using the full range of imaging techniques including EEG, MEG, fMRI, TMS, diffusion imaging, spectroscopy, intracranial recordings, lesion studies, and related methods. Submissions combining multiple techniques are particularly encouraged, as well as reports of new and innovative methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信