Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l'aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l'étude CAN-BIND-1.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Leen Magarbeh, Samar S M Elsheikh, Farhana Islam, Victoria S Marshe, Xiaoyu Men, Emytis Tavakoli, Martin Kronenbuerger, Stefan Kloiber, Benicio N Frey, Roumen Milev, Claudio N Soares, Sagar V Parikh, Franca Placenza, Stefanie Hassel, Valerie H Taylor, Francesco Leri, Pierre Blier, Rudolf Uher, Faranak Farzan, Raymond W Lam, Gustavo Turecki, Jane A Foster, Susan Rotzinger, Sidney H Kennedy, Daniel J Müller
{"title":"Polygenic Risk Score Analysis of Antidepressant Treatment Outcomes: A CAN-BIND-1 Study Report: Analyse des résultats du traitement antidépresseur à l'aide des scores de risque polygéniques : Rapport sur l'étude CAN-BIND-1.","authors":"Leen Magarbeh, Samar S M Elsheikh, Farhana Islam, Victoria S Marshe, Xiaoyu Men, Emytis Tavakoli, Martin Kronenbuerger, Stefan Kloiber, Benicio N Frey, Roumen Milev, Claudio N Soares, Sagar V Parikh, Franca Placenza, Stefanie Hassel, Valerie H Taylor, Francesco Leri, Pierre Blier, Rudolf Uher, Faranak Farzan, Raymond W Lam, Gustavo Turecki, Jane A Foster, Susan Rotzinger, Sidney H Kennedy, Daniel J Müller","doi":"10.1177/07067437251329073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveThe genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for major psychiatric disorders and a personality trait (neuroticism) are associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes.MethodsWe analysed 148 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 (CAN-BIND-1) cohort. Participants initially received escitalopram (ESC) monotherapy for 8 weeks. Nonresponders at week 8 received augmentation with aripiprazole (ARI), while responders continued ESC until week 16. Primary outcomes were remission status and symptom improvement measured at weeks 8 and 16. At week 16, post-hoc stratified analyses were performed by treatment arm (ESC-only vs. ESC + ARI). Eleven PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies of psychiatric disorders (e.g., MDD and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)) and neuroticism, were analysed for associations with these outcomes using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsAt week 8, a higher PRS for PTSD was nominally associated with a lower probability of remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.08 [0.014-0.42], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.017) and reduced symptom improvement (beta (standard error) = -29.15 (9.76), empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.019). Similarly, a higher PRS for MDD was nominally associated with decreased remission probability (OR = 0.38 [0.18-0.78], empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.044). However, none of the results survived multiple testing corrections. At week 16, the stratified analysis for the ESC-only group revealed that a higher PRS for MDD was associated with increased remission probability (empirical <i>p-</i>value = 0.034) and greater symptom improvement (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.02). In contrast, higher PRSs for schizophrenia (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.013) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (empirical <i>p</i>-value = 0.032) were associated with lower symptom improvement. No significant associations were observed in the ESC + ARI group.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PRSs may influence treatment outcomes, particularly in ESC monotherapy. Replication in larger studies is needed to validate these observations.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"7067437251329073"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955985/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437251329073","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveThe genetic architecture of antidepressant response is poorly understood. This study investigated whether polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for major psychiatric disorders and a personality trait (neuroticism) are associated with antidepressant treatment outcomes.MethodsWe analysed 148 participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) from the Canadian Biomarker Integration Network for Depression-1 (CAN-BIND-1) cohort. Participants initially received escitalopram (ESC) monotherapy for 8 weeks. Nonresponders at week 8 received augmentation with aripiprazole (ARI), while responders continued ESC until week 16. Primary outcomes were remission status and symptom improvement measured at weeks 8 and 16. At week 16, post-hoc stratified analyses were performed by treatment arm (ESC-only vs. ESC + ARI). Eleven PRSs derived from genome-wide association studies of psychiatric disorders (e.g., MDD and post-traumatic stress syndrome (PTSD)) and neuroticism, were analysed for associations with these outcomes using logistic and linear regression models.ResultsAt week 8, a higher PRS for PTSD was nominally associated with a lower probability of remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.08 [0.014-0.42], empirical p-value = 0.017) and reduced symptom improvement (beta (standard error) = -29.15 (9.76), empirical p-value = 0.019). Similarly, a higher PRS for MDD was nominally associated with decreased remission probability (OR = 0.38 [0.18-0.78], empirical p-value = 0.044). However, none of the results survived multiple testing corrections. At week 16, the stratified analysis for the ESC-only group revealed that a higher PRS for MDD was associated with increased remission probability (empirical p-value = 0.034) and greater symptom improvement (empirical p-value = 0.02). In contrast, higher PRSs for schizophrenia (empirical p-value = 0.013) and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (empirical p-value = 0.032) were associated with lower symptom improvement. No significant associations were observed in the ESC + ARI group.ConclusionsThese findings suggest that PRSs may influence treatment outcomes, particularly in ESC monotherapy. Replication in larger studies is needed to validate these observations.

抗抑郁治疗结果的多基因风险评分分析:CAN-BIND-1研究报告:使用多基因风险评分分析抗抑郁治疗结果:CAN-BIND-1研究报告。
目的抗抑郁反应的遗传结构尚不清楚。本研究调查了主要精神疾病的多基因风险评分(PRSs)和人格特质(神经质)是否与抗抑郁治疗结果相关。方法我们分析了来自加拿大抑郁症生物标志物整合网络-1 (CAN-BIND-1)队列的148名重度抑郁症(MDD)患者。参与者最初接受艾司西酞普兰(ESC)单药治疗8周。在第8周无应答者接受阿立哌唑(ARI)的强化治疗,而应答者继续ESC直到第16周。主要结果是在第8周和第16周测量的缓解状态和症状改善。在第16周,对治疗组进行事后分层分析(ESC组与ESC + ARI组)。使用逻辑和线性回归模型分析了来自精神疾病(如重度抑郁症和创伤后应激综合症)和神经质的全基因组关联研究的11个PRSs与这些结果的关联。结果在第8周,PTSD的PRS越高,症状缓解的可能性越低(比值比(OR) = 0.08[0.014-0.42],经验p值= 0.017),症状改善的可能性越低(β(标准误差)= -29.15(9.76),经验p值= 0.019)。同样,名义上,MDD的高PRS与降低的缓解概率相关(OR = 0.38[0.18-0.78],经验p值= 0.044)。然而,没有一个结果经得起多次测试修正。在第16周,仅esc组的分层分析显示,更高的MDD PRS与增加的缓解概率(经验p值= 0.034)和更大的症状改善(经验p值= 0.02)相关。相比之下,精神分裂症(经验p值= 0.013)和注意缺陷多动障碍(经验p值= 0.032)的高PRSs与较低的症状改善相关。ESC + ARI组无显著相关性。结论:这些发现表明,PRSs可能影响治疗结果,特别是ESC单药治疗。需要在更大规模的研究中进行复制来验证这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信