Matthew Johnson, Wole Ademola Adewole, Victor Alegana, C Edson Utazi, Nuala McGrath, James Wright
{"title":"A scoping review of the methods used to estimate health facility catchment populations for child health indicators in sub-Saharan Africa.","authors":"Matthew Johnson, Wole Ademola Adewole, Victor Alegana, C Edson Utazi, Nuala McGrath, James Wright","doi":"10.1186/s12963-025-00374-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence indicating persistent geographic inequalities in health outcomes signifies a need for routine subnational monitoring of health-related Sustainable Development Goal targets in sub-Saharan Africa. Health facilities may be an appropriate subnational unit for monitoring purposes, but a lack of suitable demographic data complicates the production of baseline facility-level population denominators against which progress can be reliably measured. This scoping review aimed to map the methods and data sources used to estimate health facility catchment areas and translate them to population denominators for child health indicators in the region.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Peer-reviewed research publications and grey literature reports were identified by searching bibliographic databases and relevant organisational websites. The inclusion criteria required that studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa since January 2000, described quantitative method(s) for estimating health facility catchment areas and/or population denominators, and focussed on children as the population of interest. Following title/abstract then full text screening of search results, relevant data were extracted using a standard form. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract themes and present a narrative synthesis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 33 research publications and 3 grey literature reports were included. Of these, only 7 research studies and 1 technical guidance document outlined aims explicitly framed around methods development and/or evaluation. Studies increasingly estimated catchment areas using complex geostatistical or travel time-based modelling approaches rather than simpler proximity metrics, and produced denominators by intersecting catchment boundaries with gridded population surfaces rather than aggregating area-based administrative counts. Few studies used data produced by or describing health facilities to link estimation methods to service utilisation patterns, inter-facility competition or facility characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a need for catchment population estimation methods that can be scaled to national-level facility networks and replicated across the region. This could be achieved by leveraging routinely collected health data and other readily available and nationally consistent data sources. Future methodological development should emphasise modern geostatistical approaches drawing upon the relative strengths of multiple data sources and capturing the range of spatial, supply-side, individual-level and environmental factors with potential to influence catchments' extent, shape and demographic composition.</p>","PeriodicalId":51476,"journal":{"name":"Population Health Metrics","volume":"23 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11955140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Health Metrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12963-025-00374-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Evidence indicating persistent geographic inequalities in health outcomes signifies a need for routine subnational monitoring of health-related Sustainable Development Goal targets in sub-Saharan Africa. Health facilities may be an appropriate subnational unit for monitoring purposes, but a lack of suitable demographic data complicates the production of baseline facility-level population denominators against which progress can be reliably measured. This scoping review aimed to map the methods and data sources used to estimate health facility catchment areas and translate them to population denominators for child health indicators in the region.
Methods: Peer-reviewed research publications and grey literature reports were identified by searching bibliographic databases and relevant organisational websites. The inclusion criteria required that studies were conducted in sub-Saharan Africa since January 2000, described quantitative method(s) for estimating health facility catchment areas and/or population denominators, and focussed on children as the population of interest. Following title/abstract then full text screening of search results, relevant data were extracted using a standard form. Thematic analysis was undertaken to extract themes and present a narrative synthesis.
Results: Overall, 33 research publications and 3 grey literature reports were included. Of these, only 7 research studies and 1 technical guidance document outlined aims explicitly framed around methods development and/or evaluation. Studies increasingly estimated catchment areas using complex geostatistical or travel time-based modelling approaches rather than simpler proximity metrics, and produced denominators by intersecting catchment boundaries with gridded population surfaces rather than aggregating area-based administrative counts. Few studies used data produced by or describing health facilities to link estimation methods to service utilisation patterns, inter-facility competition or facility characteristics.
Conclusion: There is a need for catchment population estimation methods that can be scaled to national-level facility networks and replicated across the region. This could be achieved by leveraging routinely collected health data and other readily available and nationally consistent data sources. Future methodological development should emphasise modern geostatistical approaches drawing upon the relative strengths of multiple data sources and capturing the range of spatial, supply-side, individual-level and environmental factors with potential to influence catchments' extent, shape and demographic composition.
期刊介绍:
Population Health Metrics aims to advance the science of population health assessment, and welcomes papers relating to concepts, methods, ethics, applications, and summary measures of population health. The journal provides a unique platform for population health researchers to share their findings with the global community. We seek research that addresses the communication of population health measures and policy implications to stakeholders; this includes papers related to burden estimation and risk assessment, and research addressing population health across the full range of development. Population Health Metrics covers a broad range of topics encompassing health state measurement and valuation, summary measures of population health, descriptive epidemiology at the population level, burden of disease and injury analysis, disease and risk factor modeling for populations, and comparative assessment of risks to health at the population level. The journal is also interested in how to use and communicate indicators of population health to reduce disease burden, and the approaches for translating from indicators of population health to health-advancing actions. As a cross-cutting topic of importance, we are particularly interested in inequalities in population health and their measurement.