The Effect of Clinical Decision Support Intervention on Monitoring for Donor Specific Antibodies.

IF 1.8 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Aja Aravamudhan, Carolynn Scalf, Michael P Greenwood, Penn Muluhngwi
{"title":"The Effect of Clinical Decision Support Intervention on Monitoring for Donor Specific Antibodies.","authors":"Aja Aravamudhan, Carolynn Scalf, Michael P Greenwood, Penn Muluhngwi","doi":"10.1093/jalm/jfaf030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Following transplantation, it is recommended that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor specific antibody (DSA) monitoring for allograft surveillance be tailored to the patient's antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) risk and immunosuppression needs. However, at our institution, DSA orders were placed more frequently than recommended, with daily duplications due to inconsistent ordering across departments (outpatient, emergency, and inpatient). We evaluated the effectiveness of a non-interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) system integrated with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) in reducing redundant DSA orders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>CDS included an indication prompt and test status indicator to help providers review test rationale and flag active orders. We then evaluated its impact of this intervention in 5-month periods before and after implementation, using statistical analyses to assess the differences with a t-test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the pre-implementation period, 82.5% (1504/1824) of DSA orders from 473 of 792 patients were duplicates, compared to 79.6% (1415/1778) from 463 of 826 patients post-implementation. After excluding cases without reported DSA and overlapping patients, each group had 466 unique patients. Duplicate orders decreased within 50 days post-implementation but increased beyond this period. Among renal transplant recipients, the fraction of duplicate orders within a week significantly dropped (pre-implementation n = 9, post-implementation n = 26, P = 0.009). DSA levels remained stable, suggesting the intervention did not impact detection rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The CDS implemented reduced unwarranted duplicate orders within 2 weeks of a prior order without affecting long-term (>50 days) monitoring protocols, demonstrating the effectiveness of non-interruptive CDS-CPOE in improving HLA test ordering.</p>","PeriodicalId":46361,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jalm/jfaf030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Following transplantation, it is recommended that human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor specific antibody (DSA) monitoring for allograft surveillance be tailored to the patient's antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) risk and immunosuppression needs. However, at our institution, DSA orders were placed more frequently than recommended, with daily duplications due to inconsistent ordering across departments (outpatient, emergency, and inpatient). We evaluated the effectiveness of a non-interruptive clinical decision support (CDS) system integrated with computerized provider order entry (CPOE) in reducing redundant DSA orders.

Methods: CDS included an indication prompt and test status indicator to help providers review test rationale and flag active orders. We then evaluated its impact of this intervention in 5-month periods before and after implementation, using statistical analyses to assess the differences with a t-test.

Results: In the pre-implementation period, 82.5% (1504/1824) of DSA orders from 473 of 792 patients were duplicates, compared to 79.6% (1415/1778) from 463 of 826 patients post-implementation. After excluding cases without reported DSA and overlapping patients, each group had 466 unique patients. Duplicate orders decreased within 50 days post-implementation but increased beyond this period. Among renal transplant recipients, the fraction of duplicate orders within a week significantly dropped (pre-implementation n = 9, post-implementation n = 26, P = 0.009). DSA levels remained stable, suggesting the intervention did not impact detection rates.

Conclusion: The CDS implemented reduced unwarranted duplicate orders within 2 weeks of a prior order without affecting long-term (>50 days) monitoring protocols, demonstrating the effectiveness of non-interruptive CDS-CPOE in improving HLA test ordering.

临床决策支持干预对监测捐献者特异性抗体的影响。
背景:移植后,建议根据患者抗体介导的排斥反应(AMR)风险和免疫抑制需求,对同种异体移植监测进行人类白细胞抗原(HLA)供体特异性抗体(DSA)监测。然而,在我们的机构,DSA订单比推荐的要频繁,由于科室(门诊、急诊和住院)的订单不一致,每天的订单重复。我们评估了非间断临床决策支持(CDS)系统与计算机化供应商订单输入(CPOE)在减少冗余DSA订单方面的有效性。方法:CDS包括指示提示和测试状态指示,以帮助提供者审查测试的基本原理和标记有效的订单。然后,我们在实施前后的5个月期间评估了该干预措施的影响,使用统计分析来评估t检验的差异。结果:在实施前,792例患者中473例患者的DSA订单中有82.5%(1540 /1824)是重复的,而实施后,826例患者中463例患者的DSA订单中有79.6%(1415/1778)是重复的。在排除无DSA报告病例和重叠患者后,每组有466例独特患者。重复订单在实施后50天内减少,但在此之后增加。在肾移植受者中,一周内重复订单的比例显著下降(实施前n = 9,实施后n = 26, P = 0.009)。DSA水平保持稳定,表明干预没有影响检出率。结论:CDS的实施减少了之前订单2周内不必要的重复订单,而不影响长期(50天)监测协议,证明了非间断CDS- cpoe在改善HLA检测订单方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine
Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.00%
发文量
137
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信