Using Digital Technology to Facilitate Choice for Food Pantry Customers: An Evaluation of a Pilot Program.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Yvette Ng, Katherine Tomaino Fraser, Aikaterini Stamou, Alyson Rosenthal, Nevin Cohen
{"title":"Using Digital Technology to Facilitate Choice for Food Pantry Customers: An Evaluation of a Pilot Program.","authors":"Yvette Ng, Katherine Tomaino Fraser, Aikaterini Stamou, Alyson Rosenthal, Nevin Cohen","doi":"10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel Digital Choice model at an urban food pantry from customer and staff perspectives.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Focus groups, cross-sectional survey, and in-depth interviews.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>New York City.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty Digital Choice customers participated in 3 focus groups, 326 Digital Choice and non-Digital Choice customers completed the survey, and 8 program staff were interviewed.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The Digital Choice model used text messaging/online forms to allow customers to preorder 1 of 4 pantry boxes for pickup at 1 of 3 community sites.</p><p><strong>Phenomena of interest: </strong>Feasibility, acceptability.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Themes were identified in interviews and focus groups using inductive and deductive approaches, and descriptive statistics were produced from survey and order data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Digital Choice customers indicated high overall satisfaction with the program (96% rated the experience positively), and staff found the program feasible to implement at the current scale. However, among the broader population of Digital Choice and non-Digital Choice customers, 40% indicated challenges with technology.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>This evaluation suggests that incorporating digital technology to facilitate customer choice and partnering with community sites in the food pantry process is feasible and acceptable for many, but not all, customers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50107,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2025.02.011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a novel Digital Choice model at an urban food pantry from customer and staff perspectives.

Design: Focus groups, cross-sectional survey, and in-depth interviews.

Setting: New York City.

Participants: Thirty Digital Choice customers participated in 3 focus groups, 326 Digital Choice and non-Digital Choice customers completed the survey, and 8 program staff were interviewed.

Interventions: The Digital Choice model used text messaging/online forms to allow customers to preorder 1 of 4 pantry boxes for pickup at 1 of 3 community sites.

Phenomena of interest: Feasibility, acceptability.

Analysis: Themes were identified in interviews and focus groups using inductive and deductive approaches, and descriptive statistics were produced from survey and order data.

Results: Digital Choice customers indicated high overall satisfaction with the program (96% rated the experience positively), and staff found the program feasible to implement at the current scale. However, among the broader population of Digital Choice and non-Digital Choice customers, 40% indicated challenges with technology.

Conclusions and implications: This evaluation suggests that incorporating digital technology to facilitate customer choice and partnering with community sites in the food pantry process is feasible and acceptable for many, but not all, customers.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
379
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior (JNEB), the official journal of the Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior, is a refereed, scientific periodical that serves as a global resource for all professionals with an interest in nutrition education; nutrition and physical activity behavior theories and intervention outcomes; complementary and alternative medicine related to nutrition behaviors; food environment; food, nutrition, and physical activity communication strategies including technology; nutrition-related economics; food safety education; and scholarship of learning related to these areas. The purpose of JNEB is to document and disseminate original research and emerging issues and practices relevant to these areas worldwide. The Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior welcomes evidence-based manuscripts that provide new insights and useful findings related to nutrition education research, practice and policy. The content areas of JNEB reflect the diverse interests in nutrition and physical activity related to public health, nutritional sciences, education, behavioral economics, family and consumer sciences, and eHealth, including the interests of community-based nutrition-practitioners. As the Society''s official journal, JNEB also includes policy statements, issue perspectives, position papers, and member communications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信