Optimizing treatment selection: outcomes of radical cystectomy in patients eligible for trimodal therapy.

IF 2.8 2区 医学 Q2 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Maurin Helen Mangold, Malin Nientiedt, Frank Waldbillig, Maurice Stephan Michel, Nicolas Carl, Britta Grüne, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair
{"title":"Optimizing treatment selection: outcomes of radical cystectomy in patients eligible for trimodal therapy.","authors":"Maurin Helen Mangold, Malin Nientiedt, Frank Waldbillig, Maurice Stephan Michel, Nicolas Carl, Britta Grüne, Maximilian Christian Kriegmair","doi":"10.1007/s00345-025-05566-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study examines oncological and functional outcomes in a subset of patients eligible for trimodal therapy (TMT) within a large radical cystectomy (RC) cohort. It aims to determine whether TMT should be offered to all eligible patients, rather than exclusively to patients with significant comorbidities who are at high perioperative risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective analysis of 509 patients with urothelial carcinoma (pT1-pT4) who underwent RC between 2014 and 2020. Patients were divided into TMT eligible (n = 74), and TMT ineligible (n = 431) cohorts based on preoperative criteria. Key endpoints included blood loss, operative duration, urinary diversion type, adjuvant chemotherapy, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). Functional outcomes were assessed using validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>RC patients who were eligible for TMT demonstrated significantly better oncological outcomes, with higher overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.774, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 3.689, p < 0.001). They also experienced lower intraoperative blood loss (544.59 ml vs. 740.50 ml, p = 0.002) and were more likely to receive continent urinary diversion (55.1% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.01), with nearly 50% undergoing ileal neobladder reconstruction. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the TMT-ineligible group (20.8% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.003). Apart from a significant difference in the positive support domain of the ISSS (p = 0.01), no significant differences in functional outcomes were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TMT eligible patients undergoing RC have better oncological outcomes and more favourable perioperative parameters compared to TMT ineligible patients. These findings highlight the need for careful patient counselling when considering TMT as an alternative to RC. Future prospective studies are warranted to optimise treatment selection and functional outcome assessment in bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23954,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Urology","volume":"43 1","pages":"196"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-025-05566-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines oncological and functional outcomes in a subset of patients eligible for trimodal therapy (TMT) within a large radical cystectomy (RC) cohort. It aims to determine whether TMT should be offered to all eligible patients, rather than exclusively to patients with significant comorbidities who are at high perioperative risk.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 509 patients with urothelial carcinoma (pT1-pT4) who underwent RC between 2014 and 2020. Patients were divided into TMT eligible (n = 74), and TMT ineligible (n = 431) cohorts based on preoperative criteria. Key endpoints included blood loss, operative duration, urinary diversion type, adjuvant chemotherapy, and overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS). Functional outcomes were assessed using validated quality of life (QoL) questionnaires.

Results: RC patients who were eligible for TMT demonstrated significantly better oncological outcomes, with higher overall survival (OS) (HR: 2.774, p < 0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR: 3.689, p < 0.001). They also experienced lower intraoperative blood loss (544.59 ml vs. 740.50 ml, p = 0.002) and were more likely to receive continent urinary diversion (55.1% vs. 38.8%, p = 0.01), with nearly 50% undergoing ileal neobladder reconstruction. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered more frequently in the TMT-ineligible group (20.8% vs. 6.4%, p = 0.003). Apart from a significant difference in the positive support domain of the ISSS (p = 0.01), no significant differences in functional outcomes were observed.

Conclusion: TMT eligible patients undergoing RC have better oncological outcomes and more favourable perioperative parameters compared to TMT ineligible patients. These findings highlight the need for careful patient counselling when considering TMT as an alternative to RC. Future prospective studies are warranted to optimise treatment selection and functional outcome assessment in bladder cancer.

优化治疗选择:根治性膀胱切除术患者符合三模式治疗的结果。
目的:本研究考察了在一个大型根治性膀胱切除术(RC)队列中符合三模式治疗(TMT)的患者的肿瘤和功能结局。目的是确定TMT是否应该提供给所有符合条件的患者,而不是只提供给有明显合并症且围手术期风险高的患者。方法:我们对2014年至2020年间509例尿路上皮癌(pT1-pT4)患者进行了回顾性分析。根据术前标准,将患者分为TMT合格组(n = 74)和TMT不合格组(n = 431)。主要终点包括出血量、手术时间、尿分流类型、辅助化疗、总生存期和无进展生存期(OS, PFS)。使用有效的生活质量(QoL)问卷评估功能结果。结果:符合TMT条件的RC患者表现出更好的肿瘤预后,总生存期(OS)更高(HR: 2.774, p)。结论:与不符合TMT条件的患者相比,符合TMT条件的RC患者具有更好的肿瘤预后和更有利的围手术期参数。这些发现强调在考虑TMT作为RC的替代方案时,需要仔细的患者咨询。未来的前瞻性研究有必要优化膀胱癌的治疗选择和功能结局评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Urology
World Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.80%
发文量
317
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY conveys regularly the essential results of urological research and their practical and clinical relevance to a broad audience of urologists in research and clinical practice. In order to guarantee a balanced program, articles are published to reflect the developments in all fields of urology on an internationally advanced level. Each issue treats a main topic in review articles of invited international experts. Free papers are unrelated articles to the main topic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信