Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Tourists at Low Versus High Altitude: Colorado High Altitude Monitoring Pressure Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Greta Kreider Carlson, Elan Small, Andrew C Burns, Ilaria Ferrari, Tiana Linkus, Linda E Keyes
{"title":"Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Tourists at Low Versus High Altitude: Colorado High Altitude Monitoring Pressure Study.","authors":"Greta Kreider Carlson, Elan Small, Andrew C Burns, Ilaria Ferrari, Tiana Linkus, Linda E Keyes","doi":"10.1177/10806032251325563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLimited evidence exists to guide travelers about blood pressure (BP) changes at high altitude (HA). Our primary objective compared 24-h ambulatory BP at low altitude (LA) vs HA in a cohort of tourists. Exploratory analyses compared results by sex and history of underlying hypertension.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study measured ambulatory BP with Welch-Allyn ABPM 6100 monitors at LA (<1000 m) and HA (median 2751 m). Measurements included heart rate/BP every 30 min while awake and hourly overnight, BP≥180/100 mm Hg, sleep quality, and Lake Louise score (acute mountain sickness).ResultsAmong 33 participants (median age 61 y, 17 with hypertension, 12 on BP medication), 25 completed LA and HA measurements. Average 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased at HA by 6 mm Hg (95% CI, 2-10 mm Hg; <i>P</i>=0.04). When analyzed by the presence of preexisting hypertension, 24-h MAP was similar between LA and HA in those with underlying hypertension (mean difference, 4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4 to 11 mm Hg; <i>P</i>=0.3) but rose at HA in those without (mean difference, 9 mm Hg; 95% CI, 5-14 mm Hg; <i>P</i>=0.001). At HA, 24-h MAP was similar in both groups (mean difference, 9 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0-19 mm Hg; <i>P</i>=0.05). Results did not differ by sex. Severe-range BP was common in all groups and asymptomatic.ConclusionsAmong this tourist cohort, we observed an increase in average 24-h MAP at HA. Altitude-related changes in BP varied greatly between individuals. This variation was related in part to underlying hypertension but not sex. Our data suggest that BP changes are not of clinical concern in HA travelers.</p>","PeriodicalId":49360,"journal":{"name":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"10806032251325563"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wilderness & Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10806032251325563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionLimited evidence exists to guide travelers about blood pressure (BP) changes at high altitude (HA). Our primary objective compared 24-h ambulatory BP at low altitude (LA) vs HA in a cohort of tourists. Exploratory analyses compared results by sex and history of underlying hypertension.MethodsThis prospective observational cohort study measured ambulatory BP with Welch-Allyn ABPM 6100 monitors at LA (<1000 m) and HA (median 2751 m). Measurements included heart rate/BP every 30 min while awake and hourly overnight, BP≥180/100 mm Hg, sleep quality, and Lake Louise score (acute mountain sickness).ResultsAmong 33 participants (median age 61 y, 17 with hypertension, 12 on BP medication), 25 completed LA and HA measurements. Average 24-h mean arterial pressure (MAP) increased at HA by 6 mm Hg (95% CI, 2-10 mm Hg; P=0.04). When analyzed by the presence of preexisting hypertension, 24-h MAP was similar between LA and HA in those with underlying hypertension (mean difference, 4 mm Hg; 95% CI, -4 to 11 mm Hg; P=0.3) but rose at HA in those without (mean difference, 9 mm Hg; 95% CI, 5-14 mm Hg; P=0.001). At HA, 24-h MAP was similar in both groups (mean difference, 9 mm Hg; 95% CI, 0-19 mm Hg; P=0.05). Results did not differ by sex. Severe-range BP was common in all groups and asymptomatic.ConclusionsAmong this tourist cohort, we observed an increase in average 24-h MAP at HA. Altitude-related changes in BP varied greatly between individuals. This variation was related in part to underlying hypertension but not sex. Our data suggest that BP changes are not of clinical concern in HA travelers.

低海拔与高海拔游客动态血压:科罗拉多州高原监测血压研究。
在高海拔地区指导旅行者血压(BP)变化的证据有限。我们的主要目的是比较一群游客在低海拔(LA)和HA时的24小时动态血压。探索性分析比较了性别和高血压病史的结果。方法本前瞻性观察队列研究采用Welch-Allyn ABPM 6100监测仪在LA测量动态血压(P=0.04)。当分析先前存在的高血压时,LA和HA在潜在高血压患者中的24小时MAP相似(平均差异为4 mm Hg;95% CI, -4 ~ 11mmhg;P=0.3),但无HA组HA升高(平均差9 mm Hg;95% CI, 5-14 mm Hg;P = 0.001)。在HA时,两组24小时MAP相似(平均差,9 mm Hg;95% CI, 0-19 mm Hg;P = 0.05)。结果没有性别差异。严重范围的BP在所有组中都很常见且无症状。在这个游客队列中,我们观察到HA的平均24小时MAP增加。与海拔相关的血压变化在个体之间差异很大。这种变异部分与潜在的高血压有关,但与性别无关。我们的数据表明血压变化在HA旅行者中不是临床关注的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine
Wilderness & Environmental Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Wilderness & Environmental Medicine, the official journal of the Wilderness Medical Society, is the leading journal for physicians practicing medicine in austere environments. This quarterly journal features articles on all aspects of wilderness medicine, including high altitude and climbing, cold- and heat-related phenomena, natural environmental disasters, immersion and near-drowning, diving, and barotrauma, hazardous plants/animals/insects/marine animals, animal attacks, search and rescue, ethical and legal issues, aeromedial transport, survival physiology, medicine in remote environments, travel medicine, operational medicine, and wilderness trauma management. It presents original research and clinical reports from scientists and practitioners around the globe. WEM invites submissions from authors who want to take advantage of our established publication''s unique scope, wide readership, and international recognition in the field of wilderness medicine. Its readership is a diverse group of medical and outdoor professionals who choose WEM as their primary wilderness medical resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信