The use of Apple smartwatches to obtain vital signs readings in surgical patients.

IF 3.8 2区综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES

Scientific Reports Pub Date : 2025-03-29 DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-84459-0

Shadi Alzahrani, Mohammed Nadershah, Mohammed Alghamdi, Razan Baabdullah, Mohammed Bayoumi, Othman Bawajeeh, Abdulrhman Alghamdi, Amr Bayoumi

{"title":"The use of Apple smartwatches to obtain vital signs readings in surgical patients.","authors":"Shadi Alzahrani, Mohammed Nadershah, Mohammed Alghamdi, Razan Baabdullah, Mohammed Bayoumi, Othman Bawajeeh, Abdulrhman Alghamdi, Amr Bayoumi","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-84459-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wearable devices, such as Apple smartwatches, have been widely used for medical and healthcare purposes. Although they provide a wide array of applications, such as heart rate and oxygen saturation determination, only a few studies have demonstrated the reliability and accuracy of these devices. Hence, this study aimed to assess the reliability of the Apple smartwatch series 8 (ASWs8) in determining heart rate and oxygen saturation against conventional monitoring devices (CMD). This cross-section study encompassed a cohort of 52 patients from King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We collected heart rate and oxygen saturation data via the ASWs8 and CMD. Subsequently, the mean measurement of each parameter was compared and evaluated for any significant differences. The ASWs8 yielded a mean heart rate measurement of 83.04 ± 13.4 BPM, while CMD produced 82.81 ± 13.5 BPM. The mean difference stood at - 0.23 ± 0.7 BPM, with limits of agreement ranging from - 25 to 25%. No significant difference emerged in the determination of heart rate (Cronbach α = 0.999, p = 0.311). Additionally, the ASWs8 recorded an average oxygen saturation measurement of 97.10 ± 1.6%, compared to CMD's 98.23 ± 1.0%. This resulted in a mean difference of 0.74% and limits of agreement spanning from - 3 to 1%. Once again, the analysis unveiled that no statistically significant difference existed in the obtained oxygen saturation levels (Cronbach α = 0.735, p = 0.094). In this study, we have uncovered compelling evidence that the ASWs8 stands as a reliable and accurate device. It exhibits strong concordance with the CMD, rendering it suitable for continuous vital signs, particularly for heart rate and oxygen saturation. Furthermore, this device can play a pivotal role in clinical management, facilitating the early detection of abnormal physiological parameters among pre-operative patients, thereby potentially reducing hospital admissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"10920"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-84459-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wearable devices, such as Apple smartwatches, have been widely used for medical and healthcare purposes. Although they provide a wide array of applications, such as heart rate and oxygen saturation determination, only a few studies have demonstrated the reliability and accuracy of these devices. Hence, this study aimed to assess the reliability of the Apple smartwatch series 8 (ASWs8) in determining heart rate and oxygen saturation against conventional monitoring devices (CMD). This cross-section study encompassed a cohort of 52 patients from King Abdulaziz University Dental Hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. We collected heart rate and oxygen saturation data via the ASWs8 and CMD. Subsequently, the mean measurement of each parameter was compared and evaluated for any significant differences. The ASWs8 yielded a mean heart rate measurement of 83.04 ± 13.4 BPM, while CMD produced 82.81 ± 13.5 BPM. The mean difference stood at - 0.23 ± 0.7 BPM, with limits of agreement ranging from - 25 to 25%. No significant difference emerged in the determination of heart rate (Cronbach α = 0.999, p = 0.311). Additionally, the ASWs8 recorded an average oxygen saturation measurement of 97.10 ± 1.6%, compared to CMD's 98.23 ± 1.0%. This resulted in a mean difference of 0.74% and limits of agreement spanning from - 3 to 1%. Once again, the analysis unveiled that no statistically significant difference existed in the obtained oxygen saturation levels (Cronbach α = 0.735, p = 0.094). In this study, we have uncovered compelling evidence that the ASWs8 stands as a reliable and accurate device. It exhibits strong concordance with the CMD, rendering it suitable for continuous vital signs, particularly for heart rate and oxygen saturation. Furthermore, this device can play a pivotal role in clinical management, facilitating the early detection of abnormal physiological parameters among pre-operative patients, thereby potentially reducing hospital admissions.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-

CiteScore

7.50

自引率

4.30%

发文量

19567

审稿时长

3.9 months

期刊介绍： We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.