A comparison of phenotypic methods to demonstrate penicillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Ravin Hettiarachchi, Julie Allerton, Christopher McIver, Dianne Rafferty, Peter Taylor, Robert Stevens
{"title":"A comparison of phenotypic methods to demonstrate penicillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus.","authors":"Ravin Hettiarachchi, Julie Allerton, Christopher McIver, Dianne Rafferty, Peter Taylor, Robert Stevens","doi":"10.1016/j.pathol.2024.12.636","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the performance of phenotypic methods to demonstrate penicillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus isolates using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a reference. A total of 126 S. aureus isolates were categorised as penicillin-susceptible S. aureus (PSSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) using blaZ and mecA PCR. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin for each isolate was determined by broth microdilution (BMD) and agar dilution (AD) methods. Qualitative susceptibility was determined by blinded disc diffusion testing using Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity (CDS), Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methods. Categorical agreement (CA) rate, major error (ME) rate and very major error (VME) rate were calculated. These isolates were characterised into 66 PSSA, 38 MSSA and 22 MRSA by molecular testing. High rates of VME (9.6%) were encountered using BMD and AD, with 20% of penicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates having a penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L. There was no VME using disc diffusion methods with high level of agreement of interpretation by three separate plate readers. CA rate using CLSI was 98.6% with 1.4% ME rate, for CDS CA rate was 97.6% with 2.4% ME rate, and for EUCAST CA rate was 93.8% with 6.2% ME rate. All methods improved with consensus reporting after considering interpretation by the plate readers. Laboratories can confidently report penicillin susceptibility in the majority of clinical S. aureus isolates based on disc diffusion testing using CLSI, EUCAST or CDS methodologies. Consensus reporting by independent plate readers may improve CA of disc diffusion testing. Penicillin MIC determination should not be used to demonstrate penicillin susceptibly in S. aureus isolates without confirmation by disc diffusion or molecular methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":19915,"journal":{"name":"Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pathol.2024.12.636","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the performance of phenotypic methods to demonstrate penicillin susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus isolates using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) as a reference. A total of 126 S. aureus isolates were categorised as penicillin-susceptible S. aureus (PSSA), methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) using blaZ and mecA PCR. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of penicillin for each isolate was determined by broth microdilution (BMD) and agar dilution (AD) methods. Qualitative susceptibility was determined by blinded disc diffusion testing using Calibrated Dichotomous Sensitivity (CDS), Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methods. Categorical agreement (CA) rate, major error (ME) rate and very major error (VME) rate were calculated. These isolates were characterised into 66 PSSA, 38 MSSA and 22 MRSA by molecular testing. High rates of VME (9.6%) were encountered using BMD and AD, with 20% of penicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates having a penicillin MIC ≤0.125 mg/L. There was no VME using disc diffusion methods with high level of agreement of interpretation by three separate plate readers. CA rate using CLSI was 98.6% with 1.4% ME rate, for CDS CA rate was 97.6% with 2.4% ME rate, and for EUCAST CA rate was 93.8% with 6.2% ME rate. All methods improved with consensus reporting after considering interpretation by the plate readers. Laboratories can confidently report penicillin susceptibility in the majority of clinical S. aureus isolates based on disc diffusion testing using CLSI, EUCAST or CDS methodologies. Consensus reporting by independent plate readers may improve CA of disc diffusion testing. Penicillin MIC determination should not be used to demonstrate penicillin susceptibly in S. aureus isolates without confirmation by disc diffusion or molecular methods.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pathology
Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.20%
发文量
459
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Published by Elsevier from 2016 Pathology is the official journal of the Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia (RCPA). It is committed to publishing peer-reviewed, original articles related to the science of pathology in its broadest sense, including anatomical pathology, chemical pathology and biochemistry, cytopathology, experimental pathology, forensic pathology and morbid anatomy, genetics, haematology, immunology and immunopathology, microbiology and molecular pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信