Models to evaluate the pulmonary toxicity of desert dust and what we have learned from them so far: a mini-review.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Gerrit Bredeck, Roel P F Schins
{"title":"Models to evaluate the pulmonary toxicity of desert dust and what we have learned from them so far: a mini-review.","authors":"Gerrit Bredeck, Roel P F Schins","doi":"10.1007/s00210-025-03891-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Millions of people worldwide are exposed to aerosolised desert dust and are at risk of the adverse respiratory health effects it causes. This mini-review gives an overview of the study types that can be used to assess the respiratory toxicity of desert dust and the insights gained from these studies. We highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of epidemiological, in vivo, and in vitro studies. Regarding in vitro studies, we discuss models of increasing complexity, i.e., traditional submerged cell cultures, air-liquid interface cultures, organ-on-a-chip models, organoids, and precision-cut lung slices. Epidemiological studies have shown increased short-term mortality and exacerbated acute and chronic respiratory diseases after desert dust events. In contrast, a connection to the onset of chronic diseases is more difficult to prove. In vivo and in vitro studies have particularly addressed the cellular and molecular effects of desert dust. It was found that desert dust activates immune cells and induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers. The specific effects and their extent vary between dust samples from different sources. The investigation of the role of the composition is still immature and needs further effort including more extensive screenings. The advancement of easy-to-handle and realistic pulmonary in vitro models is required to automate screenings, support mechanistic insights, and enable the assessment of long-term exposure scenarios. In agreement with striving to develop new approach methodologies, such advancements can reduce and replace animal experiments and strongly benefit the translatability of research outcomes to human health protection.</p>","PeriodicalId":18876,"journal":{"name":"Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00210-025-03891-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide are exposed to aerosolised desert dust and are at risk of the adverse respiratory health effects it causes. This mini-review gives an overview of the study types that can be used to assess the respiratory toxicity of desert dust and the insights gained from these studies. We highlight the main advantages and disadvantages of epidemiological, in vivo, and in vitro studies. Regarding in vitro studies, we discuss models of increasing complexity, i.e., traditional submerged cell cultures, air-liquid interface cultures, organ-on-a-chip models, organoids, and precision-cut lung slices. Epidemiological studies have shown increased short-term mortality and exacerbated acute and chronic respiratory diseases after desert dust events. In contrast, a connection to the onset of chronic diseases is more difficult to prove. In vivo and in vitro studies have particularly addressed the cellular and molecular effects of desert dust. It was found that desert dust activates immune cells and induces the expression of inflammatory cytokines and oxidative stress markers. The specific effects and their extent vary between dust samples from different sources. The investigation of the role of the composition is still immature and needs further effort including more extensive screenings. The advancement of easy-to-handle and realistic pulmonary in vitro models is required to automate screenings, support mechanistic insights, and enable the assessment of long-term exposure scenarios. In agreement with striving to develop new approach methodologies, such advancements can reduce and replace animal experiments and strongly benefit the translatability of research outcomes to human health protection.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
142
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Naunyn-Schmiedeberg''s Archives of Pharmacology was founded in 1873 by B. Naunyn, O. Schmiedeberg and E. Klebs as Archiv für experimentelle Pathologie und Pharmakologie, is the offical journal of the German Society of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology (Deutsche Gesellschaft für experimentelle und klinische Pharmakologie und Toxikologie, DGPT) and the Sphingolipid Club. The journal publishes invited reviews, original articles, short communications and meeting reports and appears monthly. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg''s Archives of Pharmacology welcomes manuscripts for consideration of publication that report new and significant information on drug action and toxicity of chemical compounds. Thus, its scope covers all fields of experimental and clinical pharmacology as well as toxicology and includes studies in the fields of neuropharmacology and cardiovascular pharmacology as well as those describing drug actions at the cellular, biochemical and molecular levels. Moreover, submission of clinical trials with healthy volunteers or patients is encouraged. Short communications provide a means for rapid publication of significant findings of current interest that represent a conceptual advance in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信