Assessing the Effects of Home-Based Primary Care on Alzheimer's Caregivers and Support Organizations: An Application of the Health Equity Implementation Framework.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Rachel Zimmer, Aylin Aguilar, Kandice Reilly, Allison Chandler, Sydney-Evelyn Gibbs, Haley Park, Mia Yang
{"title":"Assessing the Effects of Home-Based Primary Care on Alzheimer's Caregivers and Support Organizations: An Application of the Health Equity Implementation Framework.","authors":"Rachel Zimmer, Aylin Aguilar, Kandice Reilly, Allison Chandler, Sydney-Evelyn Gibbs, Haley Park, Mia Yang","doi":"10.1177/10497323251316775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) pose significant challenges for care partners and community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in providing care. Home-based medical care (HBMC) models have emerged as a potentially equitable solution to support these individuals and organizations. Utilizing the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF), this study explores the barriers and facilitators experienced by care partners and CBO staff in Black and Latino communities. Data were collected through thirteen semi-structured interviews and four focus groups, with participants recruited from those providing care to patients enrolled in the AHWFB house call program in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish, and thematic analysis was applied to the data to identify key themes within the HEIF domains. I-Poems were presented to participants as a member-checking technique. The study identified historical mistrust and systemic racism, economic barriers, and logistical challenges as significant impediments to healthcare access. Cultural beliefs and care partner roles were explored in the context of Black and Latino care partners and their impact on approaches to care of PLWD. The HBMC model was valued for its convenience and personalized approach, though participants identified a need for improved communication with providers and greater cultural sensitivity. Additionally, participants from focus groups and caregiver interviews provided several actionable recommendations for enhancing the healthcare experiences of those dealing with ADRD.</p>","PeriodicalId":48437,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Health Research","volume":" ","pages":"10497323251316775"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323251316775","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) pose significant challenges for care partners and community-based organizations (CBOs) involved in providing care. Home-based medical care (HBMC) models have emerged as a potentially equitable solution to support these individuals and organizations. Utilizing the Health Equity Implementation Framework (HEIF), this study explores the barriers and facilitators experienced by care partners and CBO staff in Black and Latino communities. Data were collected through thirteen semi-structured interviews and four focus groups, with participants recruited from those providing care to patients enrolled in the AHWFB house call program in Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Interviews were conducted in English and Spanish, and thematic analysis was applied to the data to identify key themes within the HEIF domains. I-Poems were presented to participants as a member-checking technique. The study identified historical mistrust and systemic racism, economic barriers, and logistical challenges as significant impediments to healthcare access. Cultural beliefs and care partner roles were explored in the context of Black and Latino care partners and their impact on approaches to care of PLWD. The HBMC model was valued for its convenience and personalized approach, though participants identified a need for improved communication with providers and greater cultural sensitivity. Additionally, participants from focus groups and caregiver interviews provided several actionable recommendations for enhancing the healthcare experiences of those dealing with ADRD.

评估以家庭为基础的初级保健对阿尔茨海默氏症护理者和支持组织的影响:健康公平实施框架的应用
阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(ADRD)对参与提供护理的护理伙伴和社区组织(cbo)提出了重大挑战。以家庭为基础的医疗保健(HBMC)模式已经成为支持这些个人和组织的一种可能公平的解决方案。利用卫生公平实施框架(HEIF),本研究探讨了黑人和拉丁裔社区的护理合作伙伴和CBO工作人员遇到的障碍和促进因素。数据通过13个半结构化访谈和4个焦点小组收集,参与者来自北卡罗来纳州温斯顿-塞勒姆AHWFB上门服务项目中为患者提供护理的人员。访谈以英语和西班牙语进行,并对数据进行专题分析,以确定HEIF领域内的关键主题。I-Poems作为一种成员检查技术呈现给参与者。该研究确定了历史上的不信任和系统性的种族主义、经济障碍和后勤挑战是获得医疗保健的重大障碍。在黑人和拉丁裔护理伙伴的背景下,探讨文化信仰和护理伙伴角色及其对护理方法的影响。HBMC模式因其便利性和个性化而受到重视,尽管参与者认为需要改善与提供者的沟通,并提高文化敏感性。此外,来自焦点小组和护理人员访谈的参与者提供了一些可操作的建议,以增强那些处理ADRD的医疗保健经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
期刊介绍: QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH is an international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal for the enhancement of health care and to further the development and understanding of qualitative research methods in health care settings. We welcome manuscripts in the following areas: the description and analysis of the illness experience, health and health-seeking behaviors, the experiences of caregivers, the sociocultural organization of health care, health care policy, and related topics. We also seek critical reviews and commentaries addressing conceptual, theoretical, methodological, and ethical issues pertaining to qualitative enquiry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信