Frederick P Mariajoseph, Leon T Lai, Adrian Praeger, Ronil V Chandra, Justin Moore, Hamed Asadi, Laetitia de Villiers, Tony Goldschlager, Calvin Gan, Kevin Zhou, Albert Ho Yuen Chiu, Ferdinand Miteff, Ramon Martin Banez, Thanh Phan, Davor Pavlin-Premrl, Winston Chong, Sophie Dunkerton, Anoop Madan, Lee-Anne Slater
{"title":"The Australian Diagnostic Criteria for Contrast-Induced Encephalopathy.","authors":"Frederick P Mariajoseph, Leon T Lai, Adrian Praeger, Ronil V Chandra, Justin Moore, Hamed Asadi, Laetitia de Villiers, Tony Goldschlager, Calvin Gan, Kevin Zhou, Albert Ho Yuen Chiu, Ferdinand Miteff, Ramon Martin Banez, Thanh Phan, Davor Pavlin-Premrl, Winston Chong, Sophie Dunkerton, Anoop Madan, Lee-Anne Slater","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03601-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a recognised complication of contrast administration, however diagnosis remains challenging due to its symptom overlap with other neurological conditions and the absence of formal diagnostic criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A modified Delphi study was performed. Consultant physicians with active clinical experience with CIE patients were invited from neurovascular centres in Australia. Initial diagnostic items were derived from an extensive literature review and analysis of local institutional cases across Australia. Three Delphi rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen neurovascular specialists from nine neurovascular centres participated (81.0% response rate) between May 2024 and July 2024. In round 1, 15 diagnostic items were presented to participants, which were revised and one additional criteria suggested. In round 2, 14/16 diagnostic items achieved consensus. In round three 14/14 items achieved consensus. Ultimately, a 14-item diagnostic criteria was developed based on participant consensus. The absolute criteria exclude CIE if symptom onset is more than 24 h after contrast administration, or if symptoms can be explained by vessel occlusion/territory ischaemia, intracranial haemorrhage, epilepsy, metabolic derangement, intracranial malignancy or head trauma. The supporting criteria indicate that CIE is more probable if symptoms are reversible, correspond with the distribution of contrast administration, or are associated with reversible contrast staining, cerebral oedema or cortical/subcortical MRI signal change.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study proposes a 14-item diagnostic criteria for CIE based on expert consensus in Australia. Further research is needed to refine CIE as a clinical entity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03601-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE) is a recognised complication of contrast administration, however diagnosis remains challenging due to its symptom overlap with other neurological conditions and the absence of formal diagnostic criteria.
Methods: A modified Delphi study was performed. Consultant physicians with active clinical experience with CIE patients were invited from neurovascular centres in Australia. Initial diagnostic items were derived from an extensive literature review and analysis of local institutional cases across Australia. Three Delphi rounds were conducted. Consensus was defined as ≥ 75% agreement.
Results: Seventeen neurovascular specialists from nine neurovascular centres participated (81.0% response rate) between May 2024 and July 2024. In round 1, 15 diagnostic items were presented to participants, which were revised and one additional criteria suggested. In round 2, 14/16 diagnostic items achieved consensus. In round three 14/14 items achieved consensus. Ultimately, a 14-item diagnostic criteria was developed based on participant consensus. The absolute criteria exclude CIE if symptom onset is more than 24 h after contrast administration, or if symptoms can be explained by vessel occlusion/territory ischaemia, intracranial haemorrhage, epilepsy, metabolic derangement, intracranial malignancy or head trauma. The supporting criteria indicate that CIE is more probable if symptoms are reversible, correspond with the distribution of contrast administration, or are associated with reversible contrast staining, cerebral oedema or cortical/subcortical MRI signal change.
Conclusion: This study proposes a 14-item diagnostic criteria for CIE based on expert consensus in Australia. Further research is needed to refine CIE as a clinical entity.
期刊介绍:
Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.