Andrew B Koo, Sasha Stogniy, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Sidharth S Menon, Daniela Renedo, Benjamin Reeves, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Ryan Hebert, Adam de Havenon, Kevin N Sheth, Charles Matouk
{"title":"Single-session middle meningeal artery embolization and surgical evacuation for chronic subdural hematoma.","authors":"Andrew B Koo, Sasha Stogniy, Aladine A Elsamadicy, Sidharth S Menon, Daniela Renedo, Benjamin Reeves, Nanthiya Sujijantarat, Ryan Hebert, Adam de Havenon, Kevin N Sheth, Charles Matouk","doi":"10.1136/jnis-2025-023372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary experience of a combined middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and burr hole evacuation approach for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) under a single anesthesia session.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MMAE and burr hole surgery during the same admission at a single major academic institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients were dichotomized by those with both procedures performed under a single anesthesia session (combined) or two separate sessions (separate). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day complication and reoperation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>103 patients were included in the study (median age 74 (67-81) years), with 33.9% in the combined cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the cohorts. While cumulative procedure times were similar (separate 85 (71-110) min vs combined 96 (82-127) min), total anesthesia time was significantly longer for patients with separate procedures (separate 225 (193-264) min vs combined 165 (145-183) min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of access site complications, reoperation, stroke, or mortality between the cohorts. The combined cohort trended to have shorter length of stay (separate 6 (5-8) days vs combined 5 (4-7) days, P=0.058). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates within 90 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that MMAE performed under a single anesthesia session with burr hole evacuation surgery is a safe and potentially resource-efficient approach for the management of cSDH.</p>","PeriodicalId":16411,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnis-2025-023372","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the preliminary experience of a combined middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) and burr hole evacuation approach for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) under a single anesthesia session.
Methods: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent MMAE and burr hole surgery during the same admission at a single major academic institution between 2019 and 2024. Patients were dichotomized by those with both procedures performed under a single anesthesia session (combined) or two separate sessions (separate). Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared. The primary outcomes were in-hospital and 90-day complication and reoperation rates.
Results: 103 patients were included in the study (median age 74 (67-81) years), with 33.9% in the combined cohort. Demographics, comorbidities, and radiographic characteristics were similar between the cohorts. While cumulative procedure times were similar (separate 85 (71-110) min vs combined 96 (82-127) min), total anesthesia time was significantly longer for patients with separate procedures (separate 225 (193-264) min vs combined 165 (145-183) min, P<0.001). There were no differences in the rates of access site complications, reoperation, stroke, or mortality between the cohorts. The combined cohort trended to have shorter length of stay (separate 6 (5-8) days vs combined 5 (4-7) days, P=0.058). There were no differences in complication or reoperation rates within 90 days.
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that MMAE performed under a single anesthesia session with burr hole evacuation surgery is a safe and potentially resource-efficient approach for the management of cSDH.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery (JNIS) is a leading peer review journal for scientific research and literature pertaining to the field of neurointerventional surgery. The journal launch follows growing professional interest in neurointerventional techniques for the treatment of a range of neurological and vascular problems including stroke, aneurysms, brain tumors, and spinal compression.The journal is owned by SNIS and is also the official journal of the Interventional Chapter of the Australian and New Zealand Society of Neuroradiology (ANZSNR), the Canadian Interventional Neuro Group, the Hong Kong Neurological Society (HKNS) and the Neuroradiological Society of Taiwan.