Temporal Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Changes During Chemoradiation: An Imaging Biomarker for Tumour Response Monitoring and Spatial Recurrence Prediction in Glioblastoma.
Daniel Moore-Palhares, Liam Sp Lawrence, Sten Myrehaug, James Stewart, Jay Detsky, Chia-Lin Tseng, Hanbo Chen, Deepak Dinakaran, Pejman Maralani, Mark Ruschin, Beibei Zhang, James Perry, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Arjun Sahgal, Hany Soliman, Angus Z Lau
{"title":"Temporal Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Changes During Chemoradiation: An Imaging Biomarker for Tumour Response Monitoring and Spatial Recurrence Prediction in Glioblastoma.","authors":"Daniel Moore-Palhares, Liam Sp Lawrence, Sten Myrehaug, James Stewart, Jay Detsky, Chia-Lin Tseng, Hanbo Chen, Deepak Dinakaran, Pejman Maralani, Mark Ruschin, Beibei Zhang, James Perry, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Arjun Sahgal, Hany Soliman, Angus Z Lau","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been shown to detect early treatment response in glioblastoma. This prospective observational serial imaging study aimed to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes in gross tumour volume (GTV) regions that developed recurrence versus those that remained recurrence-free.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with glioblastoma underwent DWI at radiation planning (baseline, Fx0), fraction 10 (Fx10), fraction 20 (Fx20), and 1 month after completing a 6-week course of chemoradiation (P1M). Recurrence was contoured at the earliest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing progression. The intersection of the GTV and recurrence was labelled resistant-GTV, while non-intersecting GTV was labelled sensitive-GTV. ADC values and percentage changes from Fx0 were compared between these regions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty patients were analyzed. Median absolute ADC values for resistant (0.94 μm<sup>2</sup>/ms, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.84, 1.08) and sensitive GTV (0.93 μm<sup>2</sup>/ms, IQR: 0.87, 1.13) were similar at baseline (P=0.193), but statistically significant differences were observed from the start of radiotherapy. Median ADC changes from baseline for resistant- and sensitive-GTV were +2.5% vs. +15.1% at Fx10 (P<0.001), +8.1% vs. +23.1% at Fx20 (P<0.001), and +21.2% vs. +36.4% at P1M (P<0.001), respectively. Smaller ADC changes at Fx10 (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, P=0.005) and Fx20 (OR 0.95, P=0.010) were independent predictors of increased risk of GTV failure, adjusting for MGMT promoter methylation and extent of surgical resection.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Temporal ADC changes are promising imaging biomarkers for treatment response and spatial recurrence prediction, and may provide a target for MRI-guided biologically adapted radiation clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.03.028","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) has been shown to detect early treatment response in glioblastoma. This prospective observational serial imaging study aimed to compare apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) changes in gross tumour volume (GTV) regions that developed recurrence versus those that remained recurrence-free.
Methods: Patients with glioblastoma underwent DWI at radiation planning (baseline, Fx0), fraction 10 (Fx10), fraction 20 (Fx20), and 1 month after completing a 6-week course of chemoradiation (P1M). Recurrence was contoured at the earliest magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showing progression. The intersection of the GTV and recurrence was labelled resistant-GTV, while non-intersecting GTV was labelled sensitive-GTV. ADC values and percentage changes from Fx0 were compared between these regions.
Results: Eighty patients were analyzed. Median absolute ADC values for resistant (0.94 μm2/ms, interquartile range [IQR]: 0.84, 1.08) and sensitive GTV (0.93 μm2/ms, IQR: 0.87, 1.13) were similar at baseline (P=0.193), but statistically significant differences were observed from the start of radiotherapy. Median ADC changes from baseline for resistant- and sensitive-GTV were +2.5% vs. +15.1% at Fx10 (P<0.001), +8.1% vs. +23.1% at Fx20 (P<0.001), and +21.2% vs. +36.4% at P1M (P<0.001), respectively. Smaller ADC changes at Fx10 (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, P=0.005) and Fx20 (OR 0.95, P=0.010) were independent predictors of increased risk of GTV failure, adjusting for MGMT promoter methylation and extent of surgical resection.
Conclusions: Temporal ADC changes are promising imaging biomarkers for treatment response and spatial recurrence prediction, and may provide a target for MRI-guided biologically adapted radiation clinical trials.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field.
This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.