Approaching a phenomenal contradiction in acid-base physiology.

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
Stelios Kokkoris, Kyriakos Trigkidis, Dimitrios-Dorotheos Papadakis, Dimitrios Kostarakis, Nikolaos Gialelis, Ioannis Vasileiadis
{"title":"Approaching a phenomenal contradiction in acid-base physiology.","authors":"Stelios Kokkoris, Kyriakos Trigkidis, Dimitrios-Dorotheos Papadakis, Dimitrios Kostarakis, Nikolaos Gialelis, Ioannis Vasileiadis","doi":"10.1515/jbcpp-2025-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study focuses exclusively on the results of an arterial blood gas report, which reveal a phenomenal contradiction if one follows the physiological and physicochemical approaches as well as the standard base excess determination to interpret an acid-base disturbance. The aim of this article is not to fully describe a clinical case and make a differential diagnosis but to analyze the blood gas report data in detail and present the conclusions that result from the application of the different approaches that exist for the interpretation of acid-base disorders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The results of an arterial blood gas report of a patient with severe lactic acidosis were cross-examined using the standard base excess method and the physiologic and physiochemical approaches. The causes of the contradiction are discussed with a commentary on the underlying pathophysiology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study revealed the presence of a normal anion gap (even after correction for albumin levels), a slightly increased strong ion gap and a moderately decreased standard base excess in a patient with severe lactic acidosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This real-life case provides an opportunity to give a brief overview of the current methods for investigating acid-base disturbances in a practical way, emphasizing both the common background and the conceptual differences and similarities.</p>","PeriodicalId":15352,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/jbcpp-2025-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The study focuses exclusively on the results of an arterial blood gas report, which reveal a phenomenal contradiction if one follows the physiological and physicochemical approaches as well as the standard base excess determination to interpret an acid-base disturbance. The aim of this article is not to fully describe a clinical case and make a differential diagnosis but to analyze the blood gas report data in detail and present the conclusions that result from the application of the different approaches that exist for the interpretation of acid-base disorders.

Methods: The results of an arterial blood gas report of a patient with severe lactic acidosis were cross-examined using the standard base excess method and the physiologic and physiochemical approaches. The causes of the contradiction are discussed with a commentary on the underlying pathophysiology.

Results: The study revealed the presence of a normal anion gap (even after correction for albumin levels), a slightly increased strong ion gap and a moderately decreased standard base excess in a patient with severe lactic acidosis.

Conclusions: This real-life case provides an opportunity to give a brief overview of the current methods for investigating acid-base disturbances in a practical way, emphasizing both the common background and the conceptual differences and similarities.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology
Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology (JBCPP) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly published journal in experimental medicine. JBCPP publishes novel research in the physiological and pharmacological sciences, including brain research; cardiovascular-pulmonary interactions; exercise; thermal control; haematology; immune response; inflammation; metabolism; oxidative stress; and phytotherapy. As the borders between physiology, pharmacology and biochemistry become increasingly blurred, we also welcome papers using cutting-edge techniques in cellular and/or molecular biology to link descriptive or behavioral studies with cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the integrative processes. Topics: Behavior and Neuroprotection, Reproduction, Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity, Vascular Conditions, Cardiovascular Function, Cardiovascular-Pulmonary Interactions, Oxidative Stress, Metabolism, Immune Response, Hematological Profile, Inflammation, Infection, Phytotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信