{"title":"Endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery versus prone percutaneous nephrolithotomy for complex renal stones: critical assessment of a randomized trial.","authors":"Kareem Noah, Khaled Algamal, Tarek Elliethy, Wael Saber, Mahmoud Mobark, Mohamed Alhefnawy","doi":"10.1007/s11255-025-04445-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position for managing complex kidney stones.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized study was conducted in the urology departments of Benha University Hospital and Theodor Bilharz Research Institute between June 2021 and May 2024. A total of 60 patients with complex renal stones were randomly assigned to two groups (30 patients each). Group A underwent conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position, while Group B underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, and stone-free rates (SFR) were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding preoperative demographic data and stone characteristics. However, operative time was significantly longer in the PCNL group (119 ± 18 min) compared to the ECIRS group (105 ± 14 min) (P = 0.002). The number of punctures was also significantly higher in the PCNL group than in the ECIRS group (P = 0.001). Immediate success was notably higher in the ECIRS group (83.3%) compared to the PCNL group (53.3%) (P = 0.012). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups concerning eventual success (P = 1.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ECIRS is a highly effective treatment for complex renal stones, delivering favorable outcomes such as higher single-step stone-free rates, a lower incidence of adverse events, and a reduced need for auxiliary procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":14454,"journal":{"name":"International Urology and Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Urology and Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-025-04445-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position for managing complex kidney stones.
Methods: This prospective, randomized study was conducted in the urology departments of Benha University Hospital and Theodor Bilharz Research Institute between June 2021 and May 2024. A total of 60 patients with complex renal stones were randomly assigned to two groups (30 patients each). Group A underwent conventional percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the prone position, while Group B underwent endoscopic combined intrarenal surgery (ECIRS) in the Galdakao-Modified Supine Valdivia (GMSV) position. Data on demographic characteristics, clinical outcomes, perioperative parameters, and stone-free rates (SFR) were collected.
Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding preoperative demographic data and stone characteristics. However, operative time was significantly longer in the PCNL group (119 ± 18 min) compared to the ECIRS group (105 ± 14 min) (P = 0.002). The number of punctures was also significantly higher in the PCNL group than in the ECIRS group (P = 0.001). Immediate success was notably higher in the ECIRS group (83.3%) compared to the PCNL group (53.3%) (P = 0.012). However, no significant difference was observed between the groups concerning eventual success (P = 1.0).
Conclusion: ECIRS is a highly effective treatment for complex renal stones, delivering favorable outcomes such as higher single-step stone-free rates, a lower incidence of adverse events, and a reduced need for auxiliary procedures.
期刊介绍:
International Urology and Nephrology publishes original papers on a broad range of topics in urology, nephrology and andrology. The journal integrates papers originating from clinical practice.