Nicholas W Carris, Krystal Bullers, Mariam McKee, Jena Schanze, Taylor Eubanks, Christa Epperson, Marilyn Stern, Brian E Bunnell
{"title":"Automated lifestyle interventions and weight loss: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Nicholas W Carris, Krystal Bullers, Mariam McKee, Jena Schanze, Taylor Eubanks, Christa Epperson, Marilyn Stern, Brian E Bunnell","doi":"10.1038/s41366-025-01746-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Overweight and obesity drive cardiometabolic disease and high-intensity lifestyle interventions are standard. However, many health-systems cannot offer these interventions and many patients cannot participate even when available. Trials have assessed automated digital lifestyle interventions to improve accessibility. This systematic review identified automated digital lifestyle interventions and assessed their impact on weight loss.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>The review (CRD42023435700) identified randomized controlled trials of at least 3-months duration assessing automated digital lifestyle interventions' impact on weight loss. Data were managed through Covidence with double-blinded screening of titles/abstracts and double-blinded full-text review to determine study inclusion. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer (NWC) and verified by a second (MM, JS, TE, CE). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess bias risk and study quality was rated as High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search identified 1817 citations. The full-text of 60 reports were assessed and 17 reports of 16 studies were included. The majority (63%) were of moderate quality. No intervention produced 5% weight loss from baseline. Intervention components with the largest impact were text message encouragement and education with a cognitive behavioral approach. No specific form of self-monitoring was most effective, though some form of self-monitoring was included in most trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Some components of the automated digital lifestyle interventions showed promise. Research is needed to optimize these components (e.g., tailored messaging, cognitive-behavioral approaches) balanced with human contact. Considering the magnitude of the problem and its disproportionate impact on low socioeconomic and minority patients, interventions optimized for effect and scalability are needed to address overweight and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14183,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Obesity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Obesity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-025-01746-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/objectives: Overweight and obesity drive cardiometabolic disease and high-intensity lifestyle interventions are standard. However, many health-systems cannot offer these interventions and many patients cannot participate even when available. Trials have assessed automated digital lifestyle interventions to improve accessibility. This systematic review identified automated digital lifestyle interventions and assessed their impact on weight loss.
Subjects/methods: The review (CRD42023435700) identified randomized controlled trials of at least 3-months duration assessing automated digital lifestyle interventions' impact on weight loss. Data were managed through Covidence with double-blinded screening of titles/abstracts and double-blinded full-text review to determine study inclusion. Data extraction was completed by one reviewer (NWC) and verified by a second (MM, JS, TE, CE). The Cochrane Collaboration's tool was used to assess bias risk and study quality was rated as High, Moderate, Low, or Very Low.
Results: The search identified 1817 citations. The full-text of 60 reports were assessed and 17 reports of 16 studies were included. The majority (63%) were of moderate quality. No intervention produced 5% weight loss from baseline. Intervention components with the largest impact were text message encouragement and education with a cognitive behavioral approach. No specific form of self-monitoring was most effective, though some form of self-monitoring was included in most trials.
Conclusions: Some components of the automated digital lifestyle interventions showed promise. Research is needed to optimize these components (e.g., tailored messaging, cognitive-behavioral approaches) balanced with human contact. Considering the magnitude of the problem and its disproportionate impact on low socioeconomic and minority patients, interventions optimized for effect and scalability are needed to address overweight and obesity.
期刊介绍：
The International Journal of Obesity is a multi-disciplinary forum for research describing basic, clinical and applied studies in biochemistry, physiology, genetics and nutrition, molecular, metabolic, psychological and epidemiological aspects of obesity and related disorders.
We publish a range of content types including original research articles, technical reports, reviews, correspondence and brief communications that elaborate on significant advances in the field and cover topical issues.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
