Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole: results from Phase 3 clinical trials.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Thomas L Holland, Andrew F Shorr, J Scott Overcash, Marc Engelhardt, Mark Jones, Daniel Ionescu, Karine Litherland, Mikael Saulay, Vance G Fowler
{"title":"Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole: results from Phase 3 clinical trials.","authors":"Thomas L Holland, Andrew F Shorr, J Scott Overcash, Marc Engelhardt, Mark Jones, Daniel Ionescu, Karine Litherland, Mikael Saulay, Vance G Fowler","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ceftobiprole was non-inferior to comparators for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (bacteraemia) (SAB), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI), and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), leading to regulatory approval for these indications. Whether dosing should be modified for patients with obesity is unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This post hoc analysis evaluated the relationship of obesity and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole for SAB, ABSSSI or CABP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed based on BMI from three registrational clinical trials that evaluated ceftobiprole against comparators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 1641 patients were included from the three Phase 3 clinical trials (802 ceftobiprole; 839 comparators). When stratifying by BMI, ceftobiprole had similar outcomes to the overall ceftobiprole population (80.4%) including patients with obesity (BMI = 30-40 kg/m2) (81.7%). Severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) was associated with decreased clinical cure rates overall (68.2%) compared with the overall ceftobiprole population, and this was especially noted in the clinically evaluable patient population with CABP receiving ceftobiprole (66.7% in severe obesity versus 86.6% overall). This was also seen in the comparator group (33.3% in severe obesity versus 87.4% overall). However, the number of patients with severe obesity was low in the CABP trial. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups in all studies and not influenced by BMI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This analysis further supports the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole at current recommended doses in obese patients with SAB, ABSSSI or CABP.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf096","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ceftobiprole was non-inferior to comparators for the treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (bacteraemia) (SAB), acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection (ABSSSI), and community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP), leading to regulatory approval for these indications. Whether dosing should be modified for patients with obesity is unknown.

Objectives: This post hoc analysis evaluated the relationship of obesity and clinical outcomes in patients treated with ceftobiprole for SAB, ABSSSI or CABP.

Methods: Efficacy and safety outcomes were assessed based on BMI from three registrational clinical trials that evaluated ceftobiprole against comparators.

Results: Overall, 1641 patients were included from the three Phase 3 clinical trials (802 ceftobiprole; 839 comparators). When stratifying by BMI, ceftobiprole had similar outcomes to the overall ceftobiprole population (80.4%) including patients with obesity (BMI = 30-40 kg/m2) (81.7%). Severe obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) was associated with decreased clinical cure rates overall (68.2%) compared with the overall ceftobiprole population, and this was especially noted in the clinically evaluable patient population with CABP receiving ceftobiprole (66.7% in severe obesity versus 86.6% overall). This was also seen in the comparator group (33.3% in severe obesity versus 87.4% overall). However, the number of patients with severe obesity was low in the CABP trial. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups in all studies and not influenced by BMI.

Conclusions: This analysis further supports the efficacy and safety of ceftobiprole at current recommended doses in obese patients with SAB, ABSSSI or CABP.

肥胖对头孢双prole治疗患者临床结果的影响:来自3期临床试验的结果
背景:Ceftobiprole在治疗金黄色葡萄球菌血液感染(菌血症)(SAB)、急性细菌性皮肤和皮肤结构感染(ABSSSI)和社区获得性细菌性肺炎(CABP)方面的疗效不低于比较药,导致这些适应症获得监管部门批准。肥胖患者是否应该调整剂量尚不清楚。目的:本事后分析评估了头孢双prole治疗SAB、ABSSSI或CABP患者的肥胖与临床结果的关系。方法:根据三个注册临床试验的BMI对有效性和安全性结果进行评估,这些试验评估了头孢双prole与比较物的差异。结果:总体而言,1641例患者纳入了3项3期临床试验(802例头孢双prole;839比较器)。当按BMI进行分层时,头孢双prole的结果与头孢双prole总体人群(80.4%)相似,包括肥胖患者(BMI = 30-40 kg/m2)(81.7%)。与头孢双prole总体人群相比,重度肥胖(BMI≥40 kg/m2)与临床治愈率总体下降(68.2%)相关,这在接受头孢双prole的CABP临床可评估患者群体中尤其明显(重度肥胖66.7%,总体86.6%)。在比较组中也发现了这一点(33.3%为重度肥胖,而总体为87.4%)。然而,CABP试验中严重肥胖的患者数量很低。在所有的研究中,治疗组之间的安全性是相似的,并且不受BMI的影响。结论:该分析进一步支持头孢双prole在目前推荐剂量下治疗伴有SAB、ABSSSI或CABP的肥胖患者的有效性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信