Adequate posology of antimicrobial therapy in the septic critically ill in continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a single centre prospective observational study.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Alberto Corona, Alice Veronese, Silvia Santini, Clemente Santorsola, Dario Cattaneo, Miryam Shuman
{"title":"Adequate posology of antimicrobial therapy in the septic critically ill in continuous veno-venous hemofiltration: a single centre prospective observational study.","authors":"Alberto Corona, Alice Veronese, Silvia Santini, Clemente Santorsola, Dario Cattaneo, Miryam Shuman","doi":"10.1093/jac/dkaf089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Determining the optimal antibiotic (ATB) dosage in septic critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is still challenging. CRRT further disrupts antibiotic PK, already altered by sepsis-induced fluid shifts, volume of distribution (VD) changes and half-life modifications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Our multi-disciplinary team-comprising an intensivist, nephrologist and clinical pharmacologist-conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the extent of ATB removal by CRRT and to assess the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of the most commonly used antibiotics for treating severe infections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 135 ATB therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assessments were conducted, measuring total drug concentrations (C) in both plasma (P) and ultrafiltrate in 85 septic patients undergoing CRRT. A high sieving coefficient (∼75%) was recorded for all antibiotics, with CRRT-related drug loss described by the following equations: (i) [CUF-ATB](trough level) = 0.77 × [CP-ATB](trough level) + 0.93 ng/mL; (ii) [CUF-ATB](peak) = 0.77 × [CP-ATB](peak) + 3.1 ng/mL. The VD exhibited wide variability, with values exceeding those reported in the literature. Lower ATB molecular weight and steric hindrance were associated with a higher elimination rate constant (Kemin⁻¹). ATB TDM consistently correlated with AUC and AUC/MIC, ensuring effective bactericidal activity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite its limitations, our study suggests to carry out a loading dose for the main antibiotics and consider the daily drug loss, as identified by the linear regression equation, along with daily TDM to guide further dosing adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":14969,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaf089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Determining the optimal antibiotic (ATB) dosage in septic critically ill patients on continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is still challenging. CRRT further disrupts antibiotic PK, already altered by sepsis-induced fluid shifts, volume of distribution (VD) changes and half-life modifications.

Materials and methods: Our multi-disciplinary team-comprising an intensivist, nephrologist and clinical pharmacologist-conducted a prospective observational cohort study to evaluate the extent of ATB removal by CRRT and to assess the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters of the most commonly used antibiotics for treating severe infections.

Results: A total of 135 ATB therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) assessments were conducted, measuring total drug concentrations (C) in both plasma (P) and ultrafiltrate in 85 septic patients undergoing CRRT. A high sieving coefficient (∼75%) was recorded for all antibiotics, with CRRT-related drug loss described by the following equations: (i) [CUF-ATB](trough level) = 0.77 × [CP-ATB](trough level) + 0.93 ng/mL; (ii) [CUF-ATB](peak) = 0.77 × [CP-ATB](peak) + 3.1 ng/mL. The VD exhibited wide variability, with values exceeding those reported in the literature. Lower ATB molecular weight and steric hindrance were associated with a higher elimination rate constant (Kemin⁻¹). ATB TDM consistently correlated with AUC and AUC/MIC, ensuring effective bactericidal activity.

Conclusions: Despite its limitations, our study suggests to carry out a loading dose for the main antibiotics and consider the daily drug loss, as identified by the linear regression equation, along with daily TDM to guide further dosing adjustments.

持续静脉-静脉血液滤过对脓毒症危重患者抗菌治疗的充分评价:一项单中心前瞻性观察研究。
背景:确定接受持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)的脓毒症危重患者的最佳抗生素(ATB)剂量仍然具有挑战性。CRRT进一步破坏抗生素PK,而抗生素PK已经因败血症引起的流体转移、分布体积(VD)变化和半衰期改变而改变。材料和方法:我们的多学科团队包括一名重症医师、肾病学家和临床药理学家,他们进行了一项前瞻性观察队列研究,以评估CRRT去除ATB的程度,并评估治疗严重感染的最常用抗生素的药代动力学/药效学(PK/PD)参数。结果:共进行135次ATB治疗药物监测(TDM)评估,测定85例接受CRRT的脓毒症患者血浆(P)和超滤液中总药物浓度(C)。所有抗生素的筛分系数都很高(约75%),crrt相关的药物损失由以下公式描述:(i) [CUF-ATB](谷水平)= 0.77 × [CP-ATB](谷水平)+ 0.93 ng/mL;(2) [CUF-ATB](峰值)= 0.77×[CP-ATB](峰值)+ 3.1 ng / mL。VD表现出广泛的变异性,其值超过了文献报道的值。较低的ATB分子量和空间位阻与较高的消除速率常数(Kemin⁻¹)相关。ATB TDM与AUC和AUC/MIC一致,确保了有效的杀菌活性。结论:尽管存在局限性,但我们的研究建议对主要抗生素进行负荷剂量,并考虑由线性回归方程确定的日药物损失,以及日TDM,以指导进一步的剂量调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
5.80%
发文量
423
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents. The Journal publishes primarily in human medicine, and articles in veterinary medicine likely to have an impact on global health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信