Effectiveness of Using Analytical Grading Method for Crown Preparation Performed by Dental Students - An In-Vitro Study.

Q3 Dentistry
Indian Journal of Dental Research Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-29 DOI:10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_308_24
Mustafa N Abdulghani, Eanas I Jellil
{"title":"Effectiveness of Using Analytical Grading Method for Crown Preparation Performed by Dental Students - An In-Vitro Study.","authors":"Mustafa N Abdulghani, Eanas I Jellil","doi":"10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_308_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Tooth preparations have traditionally been graded using a visual system that either subjectively assigns a single mark (global grading) or objectively divides the grade into several smaller categories. (analytical grading using rubrics). The objective of this study is to determine how effectively rubrics work for evaluating dental students' performance in crown preparation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>In this double-blind study, 89 fourth-year dental students and three senior faculty members with master's degrees in operative dental sciences participated. To create a metal-ceramic crown, the students prepared an acrylic tooth. The parameters for evaluating the preparation were explained in detail to the students. The three senior faculty members evaluated different aspects of the preparation using an analytical rubric based on a 10-point scale. For statistical analysis, post hoc Tukey tests, ANOVA, and descriptive statistics were employed.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>One-way ANOVA showed no significant differences among the seniors for all criteria except for margin placement and two-plane reduction. There were no significant differences in the total degree of student performance among seniors; however, the highest score was given by Senior 2 (6.421 ± 1.2058), and the lowest score was given by Senior 3 (6.042 ± 1.9085). The weakest areas in the student's tooth preparations were two-plane reduction and preservation of adjacent teeth, which received the lowest student scores (48.10% and 49.10%, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>An analytical rubric is a useful tool for identifying dental students' mistakes and areas of weakness.</p>","PeriodicalId":13311,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","volume":"35 4","pages":"438-442"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijdr.ijdr_308_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Tooth preparations have traditionally been graded using a visual system that either subjectively assigns a single mark (global grading) or objectively divides the grade into several smaller categories. (analytical grading using rubrics). The objective of this study is to determine how effectively rubrics work for evaluating dental students' performance in crown preparation.

Material and methods: In this double-blind study, 89 fourth-year dental students and three senior faculty members with master's degrees in operative dental sciences participated. To create a metal-ceramic crown, the students prepared an acrylic tooth. The parameters for evaluating the preparation were explained in detail to the students. The three senior faculty members evaluated different aspects of the preparation using an analytical rubric based on a 10-point scale. For statistical analysis, post hoc Tukey tests, ANOVA, and descriptive statistics were employed.

Result: One-way ANOVA showed no significant differences among the seniors for all criteria except for margin placement and two-plane reduction. There were no significant differences in the total degree of student performance among seniors; however, the highest score was given by Senior 2 (6.421 ± 1.2058), and the lowest score was given by Senior 3 (6.042 ± 1.9085). The weakest areas in the student's tooth preparations were two-plane reduction and preservation of adjacent teeth, which received the lowest student scores (48.10% and 49.10%, respectively).

Conclusion: An analytical rubric is a useful tool for identifying dental students' mistakes and areas of weakness.

分析分级法在牙科学生牙冠预备中的有效性-一项体外研究。
传统上,牙齿准备使用视觉系统进行评分,该系统要么主观上分配单个标记(整体评分),要么客观上将等级分为几个较小的类别。(使用标准的分析分级)。本研究的目的是确定如何有效地工作,以评估牙科学生在冠准备的表现。材料与方法:89名牙科四年级学生和3名具有牙科外科硕士学位的高级教师参与了本双盲研究。为了制作金属陶瓷牙冠,学生们准备了一颗丙烯酸牙。并向学生详细说明了评估准备工作的参数。三位资深教师使用基于10分制的分析标准评估了准备工作的不同方面。统计分析采用事后Tukey检验、方差分析和描述性统计。结果:单因素方差分析显示,除边缘放置和双平面复位外,老年人在所有标准上均无显著差异。高年级学生学业成绩的总体程度无显著差异;其中高二得分最高(6.421±1.2058),高三得分最低(6.042±1.9085)。学生牙齿准备中最薄弱的领域是双平面复位和相邻牙齿保存,学生得分最低(分别为48.10%和49.10%)。结论:分析量表是识别牙科学生错误和薄弱环节的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dental Research
Indian Journal of Dental Research Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Dental Research (IJDR) is the official publication of the Indian Society for Dental Research (ISDR), India section of the International Association for Dental Research (IADR), published quarterly. IJDR publishes scientific papers on well designed and controlled original research involving orodental sciences. Papers may also include reports on unusual and interesting case presentations and invited review papers on significant topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信