Long-term follow-up of individuals with Chagas disease treated with posaconazole and benznidazole in a non-endemic region: the CHAGASAZOL cohort.

IF 10.9 1区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina
{"title":"Long-term follow-up of individuals with Chagas disease treated with posaconazole and benznidazole in a non-endemic region: the CHAGASAZOL cohort.","authors":"Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.

Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.

Results: Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.

Conclusion: Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.

对非流行地区接受泊沙康唑和苯并咪唑治疗的南美锥虫病患者进行长期随访:CHAGASAZOL队列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
25.30
自引率
2.10%
发文量
441
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信