Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina
{"title":"Long-term follow-up of individuals with Chagas disease treated with posaconazole and benznidazole in a non-endemic region: the CHAGASAZOL cohort.","authors":"Joan Roig-Sanchis, Pau Bosch-Nicolau, Aroa Silgado, Fernando Salvador, Adrián Sánchez-Montalvá, Marisa Aznar, Inés Oliveira, Juan Espinosa-Pereiro, Núria Serre-Delcor, Diana Pou, Joan Martínez-Campreciós, Elena Sulleiro, Israel Molina","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10444,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2025.03.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The CHAGASAZOL trial compared posaconazole and benznidazole for treating chronic Chagas Disease. Posaconazole showed poor short-term efficacy by means of qPCR compared to benznidazole, but few studies have reported long-term follow-up using this tool. The aim of the present study is to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the CHAGASAZOL cohort through 11 years of follow-up.
Methods: This is a prospective observational cohort of individuals who were included in the CHAGASAZOL trial. Data was censored as of December 31, 2023. Subjects initially treated with posaconazole with a positive qPCR were offered re-treatment with Benznidazole. All patients underwent clinical and electrocardiographic evaluations as well as a qPCR at a six-month or one-year interval. The primary objective was parasitological failure, defined as any positive qPCR in peripheral blood at any time during follow-up.
Results: Seventy-two participants were enrolled (median follow-up: 71 months, range 1-147). At baseline, 59 (82%) were classified as indeterminate form, 9 (12%) as cardiac, 2 (3%) as digestive and 2 (3%) as mixed forms. Forty-eight participants received posaconazole, 45 completing at least one follow-up visit. Up to 43/45 (95%) presented a positive qPCR, and of them, 35 accepted to be retreated with benznidazole. Considering those treated with benznidazole (either initially or as a re-treatment), only 3/51 (6%) showed a positive qPCR. Four (5.5%) participants showed cardiac progression after 3 to 10 years of follow-up, with an incident rate of 0.94 events per 100 person-years. Two of them had received the complete benznidazole treatment, 1 was partially treated (17 days) and 1 was only treated with posaconazole before clinical progression.
Conclusion: Even if benznidazole showed parasitological efficacy, lifelong follow-up should be offered to individuals living with CD, as both parasitological failure and clinical progression can occur many years after diagnosis and treatment.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Microbiology and Infection (CMI) is a monthly journal published by the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. It focuses on peer-reviewed papers covering basic and applied research in microbiology, infectious diseases, virology, parasitology, immunology, and epidemiology as they relate to therapy and diagnostics.